"kenneth collins" <kenneth.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:DodPd.29122$Th1.20008 at bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| [...]
| The stuff that's Engineered-into the "transmission"
| that was described in the =NYT= article is
| =Ancient=, going all the way back to "Leyden
| jars", and has been replicated, in electronics,
| in every L-C circuit that's ever been Engineered
| and manufactured. The "tanks" [pressure-vessels]
| that are incorporated into the "transmission's" En-
| gineereing are 'just' "capacitors".
| [...]
Are the old 'gravity'-fed, tank-way-up-in-the-air,
"flush toilets" ["Crappers", named after their In-
ventor, a Mr. Crapper] older than "Leyden jars"? :-]
They're "pump-storage" systems, too.
"Capacitors." :-]
Any "lock" in a "canal" is a "capacitor", and the
openings and closing of its "gates", and the ev-
ents correlated to such [movement of canal traffic,
variation of water levels, etc] can be described
as being "particulate", but they're easily seen to
be 100% continuous ['course, one needs TH
to see that at the "molecular" 'level'].
Is the printing press older than the Leyden jar?
Books are "capacitors" with respect to "inform-
ation".
Hey, so are the hierroglyphics carved into stone
tablets and/or the walls of buildings.
"Capacitors" go all the way back to the beginning
of Life. Nervous systems are "information capac-
itors". And so is Life, itself -- even viruses.
Hey, Geysers are "capacitors", and so are vol-
canoes. So are "plate techtonics".
So "capacirors" are =really= Ancient.
Why are they so 'difficult' to see when they're
comprised of 'just' energy?
Be-cause nervous-system-"information"-cap-
acitors don't, yet, 'contain' the correlated "in-
formation".
There's the "rub".
But that's 'just' TD E/I-minimization, left un-
comprehended.
k. p. collins
