From owner-sci-resources@net.bio.net Tue Dec 01 22:00:00 1992
Path: biosci!NET.BIO.NET!kristoff
From: kristoff@NET.BIO.NET (Dave Kristofferson)
Newsgroups: bionet.sci-resources
Subject: No NIH Guide on 4 December
Message-ID: <CMM.0.90.2.723310732.kristoff@net.bio.net>
Date: 2 Dec 92 15:38:52 GMT
Sender: kristoff@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Lines: 10


$$MAIL BEGIN ***********************************************************

NOTE:  The NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts will not be published
on December 4.  The next issue will be on December 11, 1992.

Please inform your colleages who receive the paper copy of the
NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts that there will not be
an issue for the week of December 4.
$$MAIL END**************************************************************

From owner-sci-resources@net.bio.net Mon Dec 07 22:00:00 1992
Path: biosci!NET.BIO.NET!kristoff
From: kristoff@NET.BIO.NET (Dave Kristofferson)
Newsgroups: bionet.sci-resources
Subject: NSF - Summary of new documents on STIS - 6 December 1992
Message-ID: <CMM.0.90.2.723773100.kristoff@net.bio.net>
Date: 8 Dec 92 00:05:00 GMT
Sender: kristoff@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Lines: 59


                     ** NEW DOCUMENTS ON STIS **

Document Type: Program Guideline

   Title: FY93 RESEARCH EQUIPMENT GRANT PROGRAM (REG)
               File size (bytes):       27941
               STIS Filename:           nsf90146   

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                ** UPDATES TO EXISTING STIS DOCUMENTS **

Document Type: Program Guideline

   Title: FY93 RESEARCH EQUIPMENT GRANT PROGRAM (REG)
               File size (bytes):       27941
               STIS Filename:           nsf90146   

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOW TO OBTAIN DOCUMENTS

The above files can be retrieved in electronic form using the STIS
system.  If you don't know how to use STIS, send an E-mail message to
stisinfo@nsf.gov (Internet) or stisinfo@NSF (BITNET).  You will receive
a copy of the STIS flyer via E-mail.

If you are already using STIS, you can use the information above to retrieve
these files:

Documents via E-mail:

     Send a message to stisserv@nsf.gov (Internet) or stisserv@NSF
     (BITNET).  Use the "STIS Filename" shown above in the "get" command.
     For example, to retrieve nsf90146, the text of your message should be 
     as follows:
                       get nsf90146

Anonymous FTP:

     FTP to stis.nsf.gov.  Use the "STIS Filename" shown above to
     retrieve a file.  For example, to retrieve nsf90146, you would
     enter:
                       ftp> get nsf90146

WAIS or Gopher:

     Do a word search on the filename as shown in the summary.

If you want a *printed* copy of a document:

     Send your name and postal mailing address, and the document title
     and number to "pubs@nsf.gov" (Internet) or "pubs@nsf" (BITNET).

If you have problems with the above procedures:

     Send a message to "stis@nsf.gov" (Internet) or "stis@NSF"
     (BITNET).  

From owner-sci-resources@net.bio.net Wed Dec 09 22:00:00 1992
Path: biosci!NET.BIO.NET!kristoff
From: kristoff@NET.BIO.NET (Dave Kristofferson)
Newsgroups: bionet.sci-resources
Subject: NIH Guide, vol. 21, no. 44, pt. 5, 11 December 1992
Message-ID: <CMM.0.90.2.723948549.kristoff@net.bio.net>
Date: 10 Dec 92 00:49:09 GMT
Sender: kristoff@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Lines: 1352


$$XID RFA AR9301 AR-93-01 P1O1 *****************************************

JUVENILE RHEUMATIC DISEASES RESEARCH CENTER PLANNING GRANT

NIH GUIDE, Volume 21, Number 44, December 11, 1992

RFA:  AR-93-01

P.T. 34; K.W. 0715170, 0715010, 0710030

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases

Letter of Intent Receipt Date:  March 1, 1993
Application Receipt Date:  April 20, 1993

PURPOSE

The National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin
Diseases (NIAMS) invites applications for a planning grant for a
juvenile rheumatic diseases research center.

The goal of the planning grant is to establish a Juvenile Rheumatic
Diseases Research Center (JRDRC).  The JRDRC planning grant will allow
the applicant to develop key multidisciplinary research areas needed to
establish a JRDRC.  A JRDRC is envisioned to be a resource center for
research in juvenile arthritis and musculoskeletal diseases.  This
center will be associated with a major medical complex or consortium
and dedicated to furthering the research effort related to juvenile
arthritis and musculoskeletal diseases.

HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000

The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health
promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000,"
a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas.  This Request
for Applications (RFA), Juvenile Rheumatic Diseases Research Center
Planning Grant, is related to the priority area of chronic disabling
conditions.  Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People
2000" (Full Report:  Stock No. 017-001-00474-0) or "Healthy People
2000" (Summary Report:  Stock No. 017-001-00473-1) through the
Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
20402-9325 (telephone 202-783-3238).

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

Applications may be submitted by domestic, for-profit and non-profit
organizations, public and private, such as universities, colleges,
hospitals, laboratories, units of State and local governments, and
eligible agencies of the Federal government that have an established
program for pediatric rheumatology and a relevant research base.
Foreign research organizations are ineligible. International
collaborations in domestic applications will only be accepted if the
resources are clearly shown to be unavailable in the United States.
Applications from  minority individuals and women are encouraged.

MECHANISM OF SUPPORT

This RFA will use the National Institutes of Health (NIH) planning
grant (P20).  Responsibility for the planning, direction, and execution
of the proposed program will be solely that of the applicant.  The
total project period for applications submitted in response to the
present RFA should be three years.  The anticipated award date is
September 30, 1993.  The direct costs requested cannot exceed $200,000
each year.  The award will not be renewed, but may be converted to
another funding mechanism.

FUNDS AVAILABLE

The estimated funds (total costs) available for the first year of
support for a JRDRC planning grant is $300,000.  One award is
anticipated.  Funding will depend on receiving applications judged
highly meritorious by peer review.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

Chronic rheumatic diseases represent an important entity among chronic
conditions affecting children.  Among the rheumatic diseases seen in
juvenile populations are rheumatoid arthritis, chronic arthritis
(systemic, polyarthritic, and pauciarticular), spondyloarthropathy,
systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, scleroderma and other
vasculopathies and connective tissue disorders.  Many childhood
rheumatic diseases have orthopaedic aspects.  A research agenda for the
genetic, infectious, and immunologic aspects of juvenile rheumatic
diseases will benefit from a multidisciplinary approach.  Because the
research issues for juvenile arthritis and musculoskeletal diseases are
complex, the NIAMS seeks to use a planning grant to explore the
potential for establishing a JRDRC through a planning grant.

Applications for a JRDRC planning grant should propose a program of
multidisciplinary research development as a resource for research in
arthritis and musculoskeletal diseases in children and for research to
develop effective education programs for children, their families, and
the public.

The goal of the planning grant will be to develop those areas needed at
the applicant institution or consortium.  The applicant should outline
the areas that may be part of a future JRDRC and the research projects
presented in the planning grant should relate to the development of key
areas in that center.  A major goal of a JRDRC is to promote bench to
bedside application of research.  Clinical projects are required.

The planning grant will provide funds for an Administrative and
Planning Core and for Pilot Studies to develop and expand the research
base.

An Administrative and Planning Core will manage the overall activities
related to developing the JRDRC.  There must be a Director (Principal
Investigator of the planning grant), a discrete administrative
structure, and an Advisory Committee.  The Core may also include the
administration of shared resources, such as data sets or community or
clinical research facilities, or provide research design and data
analysis/statistical service.

The Director will be the key figure in the scientific administration
and management of the planning grant.  The Director must be an
experienced researcher with demonstrated leadership appropriate to the
coordination and development of a Center.

Although the final administrative structure of a Center will be left to
the discretion of the applicant institution, experience demonstrates
that effective development of Center programs requires interaction
among the Director, the Principal Investigators of the pilot studies,
appropriate institutional administrative personnel, and the staff of
the NIAMS.  Like other interdisciplinary grant programs, the success of
a Center is dependent upon the involvement of scientific and
professional personnel representing a variety of disciplines who must
be willing to relate to and collaborate with each other in order to
facilitate the development of new knowledge.

The Advisory Committee assists the Director in making the scientific
and administrative decisions relating to a Center.  With the Director,
the Advisory Committee will have the responsibility of evaluating the
pilot studies proposed in the initial application and to be developed
during subsequent years.  (This does not preclude the applicant
institution from developing a separate external review process to
evaluate the scientific merit of the individual pilot studies developed
during subsequent years.  The final evaluation of the pilot studies,
however, will rest with the Advisory Committee and the Director).  The
Advisory Committee may perform other duties as deemed appropriate by
the applicant institution.  The Advisory Committee must be composed of
scientists and administrators with expertise and experience relevant to
the Center's scientific program.  Members may be employees of the
applicant institution or of other institutions.  However, at least two
members of this committee must be from outside the Director's
supervision (i.e., either at the applicant institution or another
institution).

The program areas of a JRDRC are to be related to arthritis and
musculoskeletal diseases in children and may include treatment
strategies.  In the planning grant, pilot studies are to be proposed to
expand the research base at the applicant institution.  The P20 funding
mechanism is intended to furnish modest support that will allow the
investigators the opportunity to develop preliminary data sufficient to
provide the basis for applications for independent research through
conventional granting mechanisms.  Pilot studies are typically limited
to a nonrenewable period of one to two years.

Applications submitted in response to this RFA must propose a minimum
of three pilot studies to be supported during at least the first year
of the award.  Subsequent preliminary research projects may be
developed during the course of the award.  The Advisory Committee will
have final approval for future pilot studies after a local peer review
of the proposals.

Appropriate research areas may include, but are not limited to:

o  Basic and clinical research leading to understanding the cause(s),
diagnoses, improved treatment, and ultimate prevention of arthritis and
musculoskeletal diseases in children is a critical aspect of the JRDRC.
Clinical studies may address such research areas as: providing critical
data for the design of larger clinical trials, testing the feasibility
of new pharmacologic interventions, and devising improved diagnostic
strategies.  Studies integrating physical therapy and/or orthopaedic
research with functional outcome may be included, as may epidemiologic
studies that offer new insights.

o  Research development and evaluation of new programs, techniques or
methodologies for the education of health professionals, patients,
families of patients, and the public are appropriate.  Evaluation and
validation of patient assessment tools for the pediatric population may
be proposed.  Psychosocial research leading to improved intervention
strategies, counseling, and enhancing the coping skills of children and
their families are appropriate.

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

Investigators will be asked to meet periodically with NIAMS staff in
Bethesda to review progress and plans for future work.

Applicants from institutions that have a General Clinical Research
Center (GCRC) funded by the NIH National Center for Research Resources
may wish to identify the GCRC as a resource for conducting the proposed
research.  Details of the interaction of the planning center staff and
pilot study members with the GCRC staff and research personnel may be
provided in a statement describing the collaborative linkages being
developed.  A letter of agreement from the GCRC Program Director must
be included with the application.

STUDY POPULATIONS

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS REGARDING IMPLEMENTATION OF NIH
POLICIES CONCERNING INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CLINICAL
RESEARCH STUDY POPULATIONS

NIH policy is that applicants for NIH clinical research grants and
cooperative agreements are required to include minorities and women in
study populations so that research findings can be of benefit to all
persons at risk of the disease, disorder or condition under study;
special emphasis must be placed on the need for inclusion of minorities
and women in studies of diseases, disorders and conditions which
disproportionately affect them.  This policy is intended to apply to
males and females of all ages.  If women or minorities are excluded or
inadequately represented in clinical research, particularly in proposed
population-based studies, a clear compelling rationale must be
provided.

The composition of the proposed study population must be described in
terms of gender and racial/ethnic group.  In addition, gender and
racial/ethnic issues must be addressed in developing a research design
and sample size appropriate for the scientific objectives of the study.
This information must be included in the form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91) in
Sections 1-4 of the Research Plan AND summarized in Section 5, Human
Subjects.  Applicants are urged to assess carefully the feasibility of
including the broadest possible representation of minority groups.
However, NIH recognizes that it may not be feasible or appropriate in
all research projects to include representation of the full array of
United States racial/ethnic minority populations (i.e., Native
Americans [including American Indians or Alaskan Natives],
Asian/Pacific Islanders, Blacks, Hispanics).

The rationale for studies on single minority population groups should
be provided.

For the purpose of this policy, clinical research is defined as human
biomedical and behavioral studies of etiology, epidemiology, prevention
(and preventive strategies), diagnosis, or treatment of diseases,
disorders or conditions, including, but not limited to, clinical
trials.

The usual NIH policies concerning research on human subjects also
apply.  Basic research or clinical studies in which human tissues
cannot be identified or linked to individuals are excluded.  However,
every effort should be made to include human tissues from women and
racial/ethnic minorities when it is important to apply the results of
the study broadly, and this should be addressed by applicants.

If the required information is not contained within the application,
the application will be returned.

Peer reviewers will address specifically whether the research plan in
the application conforms to these policies.  If the representation of
women or minorities in a study design is inadequate to answer the
scientific question(s) addressed AND the justification for the selected
study population is inadequate, it will be considered a scientific
weakness or deficiency in the study design and reflected in assigning
the priority score to the application.

All applications for clinical research submitted to NIH are required to
address these policies.  NIH funding components will not award grants
or cooperative agreements that do not comply with these policies.

LETTER OF INTENT

Prospective applicants are asked to submit, by March 1, 1993 a letter
of intent that includes a descriptive title of the proposed research
projects, the name, address, and telephone number of the Principal
Investigator, the identities of other key personnel and participating
institutions, and the number and title of the RFA in response to which
the application may be submitted.

Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does
not enter into the review of subsequent applications, the information
that it contains allows NIAMS staff to estimate the potential review
workload and to avoid conflict of interest in the review.

The letter of intent is to be sent to:

Dr. Julia B. Freeman
Centers Program, Extramural Programs
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
Westwood Building, Room 403
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 402-3348
FAX:  (301) 480-7881

APPLICATION PROCEDURES

The research grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91) is to be used
in applying for these grants.  These forms are available at most
institutional offices of sponsored research; from the Office of Grants
Inquiries, Division of Research Grants, National Institutes of Health,
5333 Westbard Avenue, Room 449, Bethesda, MD 20892, telephone
301/496-7441; and from the NIAMS program administrator listed under
INQUIRIES.

Special guidelines have been developed for the JRDRC planning grant.
These guidelines must be used in writing and assembling the
application.  The guidelines may be obtained by contacting the Centers
Program Director listed under INQUIRIES.

The RFA label available in the application form must be affixed to the
bottom of the face page of the application.  Failure to use this label
could result in delayed processing of the application such that it may
not reach the review committee in time for review.  In addition, the
RFA title and number must be typed on line 2a of the face page of the
application form and the YES box must be marked.

Submit a signed, typewritten original of the application, including the
Checklist, and three signed, photocopies, in one package to:

Division of Research Grants
National Institutes of Health
Westwood Building, Room 240
Bethesda, MD  20892**

At the time of submission, two additional copies of the application
must also be sent to:

Dr. Tommy L. Broadwater
Chief, Review Branch
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
Westwood Building, Room 405
Bethesda, MD  20892

Applications must be received by April 20, 1993.  If an application is
received after that date, it will be returned to the applicant without
review.

REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS

Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed for completeness by the DRG
and responsiveness by the NIAMS.  Incomplete applications will be
returned to the applicant without further consideration.

Applications may be triaged by an NIAMS peer review group on the basis
of relative competitiveness.  The NIH will withdraw from further
competition those applications judged to be non-competitive for award
and notify the applicant Principal Investigator and institutional
official.  Those applications judged to be competitive will undergo
further scientific merit review.  Those applications that are complete
and responsive will be evaluated in accordance with the criteria stated
below for scientific/technical merit by an appropriate peer review
group convened by the NIAMS.  The second level of review will be
provided by the National Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin
Diseases Council.

Review criteria for RFAs are generally the same as those for
unsolicited research grant applications:

o  scientific, technical, or medical significance and originality of
proposed research;

o  appropriateness and adequacy of the experimental approach and
methodology proposed to carry out the research;

o  qualifications and research experience of the Director (Principal
Investigator) and staff, particularly, but not exclusively, in the area
of the proposed research;

o  availability of the resources necessary to perform the research; and

o  appropriateness of the proposed budget and duration in relation to
the proposed research.

Additional scientific/technical merit criteria specific to the
objectives of a JRDRC program include:

o  qualifications, experience and commitment of the Director (Principal
Investigator) and his/her ability to devote time and effort to provide
effective leadership;

o  scientific and administrative structure, including internal and
external procedures for monitoring and evaluating the proposed research
and for providing ongoing quality control and scientific review;

o  adequacy of plans for interaction among investigators, and the
integration of the various projects;

o  potential for developing a JRDRC from the resources and projects
described; and

o  commitment to developing a JRDRC as a national resource.

AWARD CRITERIA

The anticipated date of award is September 30, 1993.

The primary factors determining the award will be the priority score
and the availability of funds.  Since the NIAMS is interested in
funding only the best research, individual research projects of lesser
quality may not be funded, even if approved, under the "umbrella" of
the planning grant (P20) mechanism.

INQUIRIES

Written and telephone inquiries concerning this RFA are encouraged.
The opportunity to clarify any issues or questions from potential
applicants is welcome.

Direct inquiries regarding programmatic issues to:

Dr. Julia B. Freeman
Centers Program, EP
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
Westwood Building, Room 403
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 402-3348
FAX:  (301) 480-7881

Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to:

Mara H. DeKemper
Grants Management Officer
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
Westwood Building, Room 732
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 496-0552

AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS

This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
No. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research.
Awards will be made under the authority of the Public Health Service
Act, Title III, Section 301 (Public Law 410, 78th Congress, as amended,
42 USC 241) and administered under PHS grant policies and Federal
regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 45 CFR Part 74.  This program is not
subject to intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order
12372 or Health Systems Agency review.


$$XID RFA HL9312 HL-93-12 P1O1 *****************************************

EXPRESSION OF TUBERCULOSIS IN THE LUNG

NIH GUIDE, Volume 21, Number 44, December 11, 1992

RFA:  HL-93-12L

P.T. 34; K.W. 0715165, 0715125, 1002004, 0710070, 1002027, 1002019

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Letter of Intent Receipt Date:  February 15, 1993
Application Receipt Date:  April 13, 1993

PURPOSE

The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) invites grant
applications for support of research on the expression of tuberculosis
(TB) in the lung.  The primary objectives of this grant program are to
encourage research on elucidating the factors involved in disease
expression following infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and
to determine the mechanisms by which such factors exert their influence
on the lung.

HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000

The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health
promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000,"
a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas.  This Request
for Applications (RFA), Expression of Tuberculosis in the Lung, is
related to the priority areas of HIV infection, and immunization and
infectious diseases.  Potential applicants may obtain a copy of
"Healthy People 2000" (Full Report:  Stock No. 017-001-00474-0) or
"Healthy People 2000" (Summary Report:  Stock No. 017-001-00473-1)
through the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office,
Washington, DC 20402-9325 (telephone 202-783-3238).

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

Among the disciplines and expertise that may be appropriate for this
research program are cell biology, immunology, infectious diseases,
microbiology, molecular biology, molecular immunology, pathology,
genetics, and pulmonary medicine.

Applications may be submitted by for-profit and non-profit
organizations, public and private, such as universities, colleges,
hospitals, laboratories, units of State and local governments, and
eligible agencies of the Federal government.  Foreign institutions are
not eligible for First Independent Research Support and transition
(FIRST) (R29) award.  Applications from minority individuals and women
are encouraged.

All current policies and requirements that govern the research grant
programs of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) will apply to
grants awarded under this RFA.  Awards under this announcement to
foreign institutions will be made only for research of very unusual
merit, need, and promise, and in accordance with PHS policy governing
such awards.

MECHANISMS OF SUPPORT

The support mechanisms for this program will be the individual research
grant (R01) and the FIRST award (R29).  While multidisciplinary
approaches are encouraged, it is not the intent of this announcement to
solicit applications for large studies encompassing a variety of
individual subprojects, i.e., program projects.  If collaborative
arrangements through subcontracts with other institutions are planned,
consult the program staff listed below.

Upon initiation of the program, the NHLBI will sponsor periodic
meetings to encourage exchange of information among investigators who
participate in this program.  In the budget for the grant application,
applicants should request travel funds for a one-day meeting each year,
most likely to be held in Bethesda, Maryland.  Applicants should also
include a statement in their applications indicating their willingness
to participate in these meetings.

Applicants (who will plan and execute their own research programs) are
expected to furnish their own estimates of time required to achieve the
objectives of the proposed research project.  Up to five years of
support may be requested for R01s; five years are required for FIRST
awards.  Requested budgets for FIRST awards may not exceed those
specified in the FIRST award guidelines.

At the end of the initial award period, renewal applications may be
submitted for peer review and competition for support through the
regular grant program of the NIH.  It is anticipated that support for
this program will begin in September 1993.  Administrative adjustments
in project period and/or amount may be required at the time of the
award.  Since a variety of approaches would represent valid responses
to this announcement, it is anticipated that there will be a range of
costs among individual grants awarded.  This RFA is a one-time
solicitation.  Future unsolicited competing continuation applications
will compete with all investigator-initiated applications and will be
reviewed according to the customary NIH peer review procedures.

FUNDS AVAILABLE

Although approximately $1,500,000 for this program is included in the
financial plans for fiscal year 1993, award of grants pursuant to this
RFA is contingent upon receipt of funds for this purpose.  It is
anticipated that six to eight new grants will be awarded under this
program.  The specific number to be funded will, however, depend on the
merit and scope of the applications received and the availability of
funds.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

Background

The Centers for Disease Control estimates that since 1984 nearly 39,000
excess cases of TB have accumulated in the United States.  This recent
change in the TB morbidity trend appears attributable, in large part,
to TB occurring in persons infected with the Human Immunodeficiency
Virus (HIV), although increasing homelessness and immigration from
regions of the world where TB is endemic are also contributing factors.

Currently a number of general approaches are being actively pursued in
basic research related to TB.  Efforts are ongoing to define
mycobacterial antigens involved in T-lymphocyte-dependent protective
immunity.  Gamma-delta-T-cells appear to be important in the
immunologic response to Mtb and are under vigorous investigation.
Research is being pursued in studies of the immunology of TB in the
context of mammalian heat shock proteins; to date four such proteins
have been identified.

The lung is the portal of entry for Mtb and local defenses in the lung,
including the mucociliary clearance mechanisms and bronchus-associated
lymphoid tissue (BALT), are involved in processes that limit spread of
infection within the lung as well as to extrapulmonary sites.  However,
most current research on TB delves into the systemic immune response to
mycobacteria and basic mycobacteriology.  By contrast, there is little
research on specific pulmonary defenses or on TB as a disease of the
lungs.

Almost nothing is known about the basic mechanisms of protective
immunity against Mtb in the lung and the local factors that contribute
to lung injury, damage, or fibrosis.  Furthermore, little is known
about the breakdown of the lung defenses that allow the rapid
progression and unusual, extrapulmonary patterns of primary and
reactivation TB that are now being observed in HIV-infected patients
who have depressed immune function.  Little or no effort has been
directed at the molecular and cellular mechanisms of TB, disease
expression in the lung or the events that relate to host defenses in
the human lung.  Beyond descriptive clinical information on the
pathology of TB, almost no new information has been obtained on the
basic mechanisms of protective immunity and the immune factors that
contribute to the natural history of Mtb infection.  A number of
factors are thought to influence susceptibility, resistance, and
severity of disease when the lung responds to infection with Mtb.  Data
from clinical studies suggest a role for innate factors which might
include such things as age, gender, ethnicity, and acquired conditions
such as associated disease states.  Aside from identifying such
factors, there has been no recent progress on obtaining information
about the mechanisms by which they exert their influence on
susceptibility/resistance or severity of TB disease.

Objectives and Scope

The overall objective of this initiative is to encourage research
directed at gaining a better understanding of disease expression in the
lung following infection with Mtb.  Applications are invited for
innovative multidisciplinary approaches to identify the factors
involved in disease expression, to determine their relationship to
other factors of disease, and to better understand how such factors
exert their influence on pathogenesis.

Several topics relevant to the objectives of this RFA are described
below in order to provide a perspective of the scope of the research
that would meet the goals of the program.  Studies in humans are
encouraged where possible.  Investigators are also encouraged to
consider other approaches that meet the goals of this program in
addition to those cited below.

More information is clearly needed to clarify the specific and
non-specific host defenses against Mtb in the lung, the local anatomic
and immunologic factors that influence the natural history of pulmonary
infection, with particular emphasis on the molecular basis for the
generation of immunopathology.  Acquired resistance to TB following
primary infection is known to directly involve the immune system such
that the ability of activated macrophages to ingest and kill virulent
Mtb organisms is influenced by the function and number of T-helper
lymphocytes.  This is of particular interest in the context of HIV
infection where T-helper cells are known to be adversely affected, and
where the pathogenesis of TB in HIV-infected patients has been observed
to differ from the classic granulomatous processes seen in HIV-negative
individuals.  Research directed at obtaining more detail about the
mechanisms of TB pathogenesis and the factors affecting
susceptibility/resistance and severity in the presence of HIV infection
are of particular interest in response to this initiative.

Another area that deserves further study concerns the genetically
determined and acquired local and systemic factors that affect immunity
and disease expression in the lung.  Studies in inbred mice have
revealed a genetic locus that modulates the innate resistance to
mycobacterial infection.  There appears to be a human homolog to this
non-Major Histocompatibility locus.  Various studies have suggested an
association between HLA-type and pulmonary TB.  Epidemiology and
clinical/pathologic studies have indicated that certain racial groups
such as African Americans develop more extensive lung damage from
pulmonary TB.  Basic research that addresses these aspects of TB could
be considered in responding to this initiative.

Little is known about the mechanisms of reactivation of TB in the lung.
The development of animal models that simulate reactivation disease
would permit exploration of areas of research on reactivation that are
not easily addressed in human studies.  Studies in humans that provide
insights into the basic mechanisms of this aspect of disease expression
would also be a desirable approach.

Local factors in the lung such as underlying bronchiectasis or
silicosis are known to influence fibrosis and other sequelae of TB.  In
cases where extensive fibrosis occurs, the mechanisms involved remain
unexplored.  In most cases of TB extensive fibrosis is not seen, yet
when bronchiectasis is present fibrosis is a common occurrence.
Studies elucidating the relationship between TB complicated by
bronchiectasis and/or silicosis, and fibrosis is another example of
research that would meet the goals of this program.

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

Applications that propose descriptive studies in humans only and do not
contain studies directed at uncovering mechanisms of disease or
supporting hypotheses related to mechanisms of disease expression will
not be acceptable.  This program will not support studies directed at
development of animal models alone.  Models must be applied to the
study of disease mechanisms associated with expression of TB in the
lung and whenever possible, the testing of hypothesis in the animal
model should carry over to human studies. Applications that focus on
molecular biology and molecular immunology of disease expression are of
particular interest.

STUDY POPULATIONS

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS REGARDING IMPLEMENTATION OF NIH
POLICIES CONCERNING INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CLINICAL
RESEARCH STUDY POPULATIONS

NIH policy is that applicants for NIH clinical research grants and
cooperative agreements will be required to include minorities and women
in study populations so that research findings can be of benefit to all
persons at risk of the disease, disorder or condition under study;
special emphasis should be placed on the need for inclusion of
minorities and women in studies of diseases, disorders and conditions
which disproportionately affect them.  This policy is intended to apply
to males and females of all ages.  If women or minorities are excluded
or inadequately represented in clinical research, particularly in
proposed population-based studies, a clear compelling rationale should
be provided.

The composition of the proposed study population must be described in
terms of gender and racial/ethnic group.  In addition, gender and
racial/ethnic issues should be addressed in developing a research
design and sample size appropriate for the scientific objectives of the
study.  This information should be included in the form PHS-398 in
Sections 1-4 of the Research Plan AND summarized in Section 5, Human
Subjects.  Applicants are urged to assess carefully the feasibility of
including the broadest possible representation of minority groups.
However, NIH recognizes that it may not be feasible or appropriate in
all research projects to include representation of the full array of
United States racial/ethnic minority populations (i.e., Native
Americans [including American Indians or Alaskan Natives],
Asian/Pacific Islanders, Blacks, Hispanics).  The rationale for studies
on single minority population groups should be provided.

For the purpose of this policy, clinical research includes human
biomedical and behavioral studies of etiology, epidemiology, prevention
(and preventive strategies), diagnosis, or treatment of diseases,
disorders or conditions, including but not limited to clinical trials.

The usual NIH policies concerning research on human subjects also
apply.  Basic research or clinical studies in which human tissues
cannot be identified or linked to individuals are not subject to these
policies.  However, every effort should be made to include human
tissues from women and racial/ethnic minorities when it is important to
apply the results of the study broadly, and this should be addressed by
applicants.

For foreign awards, the policy on inclusion of women applies fully;
since the definition of minority differs in other countries, the
applicant must discuss the relevance of research involving foreign
population groups to the United States' populations, including
minorities.

If the required information is not contained within the application,
the application will be returned.

Peer reviewers will address specifically whether the research plan in
the application conforms to these policies.  If the representation of
women or minorities in a study design in inadequate to answer the
scientific question(s) addressed AND the justification for the selected
study population is inadequate, it will be considered a scientific
weakness or deficiency in the study design and will be reflected in
assigning the priority score to the application.  NIH funding
components will not award grants or cooperative agreements that do not
comply with these policies.

LETTER OF INTENT

Prospective applicants are asked to submit, by February 15, 1993, a
letter of intent that includesa descriptive title of the proposed
research, the name, address, and telephone number of the Principal
Investigator, the names of any other participating institutions or
investigators, and the number and title of the RFA in response to which
the application may be submitted.  A letter of intent is not binding,
will not enter into the review of any application subsequently
submitted, and is not a requirement for application.  Such letters are
requested for the purpose of obtaining an indication of the number of
applications to be received.  The NHLBI will not provide a response to
a letter of intent.  The letter is to be received no later than
February 15, 1993 and sent to:

Chief, Centers and Special Projects Review Section
Review Branch, Division of Extramural Affairs
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Westwood Building, Room 553
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 496-7351
FAX:  (301) 402-1660

APPLICATION PROCEDURES

The research grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91) is to be used
in applying for these grants.  These forms are available at most
institutional offices of sponsored research; from the Office of Grants
Inquiries, Division of Research Grants, National Institutes of Health,
5333 Westbard Avenue, Room 449, Bethesda, MD 20892, telephone
301-496-7441; and from the NIH program administrator named below.  Use
the conventional format for research project grant applications and
ensure the points identified in the section Review Procedures and
Criteria are fulfilled.  To identify the application as a response to
this RFA, check "yes" on item 2a of page 1 of the application and enter
the title, Expression of Tuberculosis in the Lung, HL-93-12L.

The RFA label available in the application kit must be affixed to the
bottom of the face page of the original completed application.  Failure
to use this label could result in delayed processing of the application
such that it may not reach the review committee in time for review.

Send or deliver the completed application and three signed and
completed photocopies to:

Division of Research Grants
National Institutes of Health
Westwood Building, Room 240
Bethesda, MD  20892**

Send two additional copies of the application to the Chief, Centers and
Special Projects Review Section at the address listed under letter of
intent.  It is important to send these two copies at the same time as
the original and three copies are sent to the Division of Research
Grants (DRG).  Otherwise the NHLBI cannot guarantee that the
application will be reviewed in competition for this RFA.

Applications must be received by April 13, 1993.  If an application is
received after this date, it will be returned to the applicant without
review.  The DRG will not accept any application in response to this
announcement that is essentially the same as one currently pending
initial review, unless the applicant withdraws the pending application.
The DRG will not accept any application that is essentially the same as
one already reviewed.  This does not preclude the submission of
substantial revisions of applications already reviewed, but such
applications must include an introduction addressing the previous
critique.

REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS

Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed for completeness by the DRG
and responsiveness to the objectives of this RFA by the NHLBI.
Incomplete applications will be returned withoug further consideration.
If an application is judged unresponsive, the applicant will be
contacted and given an opportunity to withdraw the application or to
have it considered for the regular, investigator-initiated grant
program of the NIH.

Applications judged to be responsive will be reviewed for scientific
and technical merit by an initial review group, convened by the
Division of Extramural Affairs, NHLBI, solely to review these
applications.

This initial review will include a preliminary evaluation to determine
scientific merit relative to the other applications received in
response to this RFA (triage); the NIH will withdraw from further
consideration applications judged to be noncompetitive and promptly
notify the principal investigator and the official signing for the
applicant organization.  Those applications judged to be competitive
will be further evaluated for scientific/technical merit by the usual
peer review procedures.

Review Criteria.  The factors to be considered in the evaluation of
scientific merit of each application will be similar to those used in
the review of traditional research project grant applications including
the novelty, originality, and feasibility of the approach; the
training, experience, and research competence of the investigator(s);
the adequacy of the experimental design; the suitability of the
facilities; and the appropriateness of the requested budget to the work
proposed.

AWARD CRITERIA

The anticipated date of award is September 30, 1993.  In addition to
the scientific merit of the applications, awards will be based on
responsiveness to the RFA and the availability of resources.

INQUIRIES

Direct inquiries regarding programmatic issues to:

Hannah H. Peavy, M.D.
Interstitial Lung Diseases Branch
Division of Lung Diseases
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Westwood Building, Room 6A09
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 496-7034
FAX:  (301) 496-9886

Direct inquiries regarding review matters to:

Chief, Centers and Special Projects Review Section
Review Branch, Division of Extramural Affairs
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Westwood Building, Room 553
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 496-7351
FAX:  (301) 402-1660

Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to:

Raymond L. Zimmerman
Grants Operations Branch
Division of Extramural Affairs
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Westwood Building, Room 4A17
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 496-4970
FAX:  (301) 402-1200

AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS

This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance, No. 93.838.  Grants will be awarded under the authority of
the Public Health Service Act, Title III, Section 301 (Public Law
78-410, as amended: 42 USC 241) and administered under PHS grants
policies and Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 45 CFR Part 74.
This program is not subject to the intergovernmental review
requirements of Executive Order 12372 or to review by a Health Systems
Agency.


$$XID RFA DK9310 DK-93-10 P1O1 *****************************************

HUMAN GENES FOR NON-INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS

NIH GUIDE, Volume 21, Number 44, December 11, 1992

RFA:  DK-93-10

P.T. 34; K.W. 0715075, 0755035, 0755040, 0760015

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

Letter of Intent Receipt Date:  February 18, 1993
Application Receipt Date:  March 17, 1993

PURPOSE

The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
(NIDDK) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) invite
investigator-initiated research grant applications to identify specific
genes responsible for non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM)
in humans.  It is anticipated that this identification will require an
interdisciplinary approach to develop and utilize strategies that will
elucidate genes responsible for NIDDM using appropriate family
pedigrees.

Applications will be submitted to the National Institutes of Health
(NIH) and will be reviewed by NIH according to the usual NIH peer
review procedures.  Applications judged meritorious and designated for
funding will be supported partially by the NIDDK and partially by the
ADA through the issuance of coordinated but separate awards by the two
funding organizations.  In order to facilitate the coordination of the
NIDDK and the ADA, applicants are requested to provide the NIDDK
authorization to allow the NIDDK to provide a copy of their letter of
intent, application, NIH-prepared summary statement of the initial
review, and yearly progress reports (if the application is funded) to
the ADA.  Applicants wishing to be considered for funding only by the
NIDDK should so indicate in their letter of authorization.  Under these
latter circumstances, no information pertaining to their application
will be shared with the ADA.

HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000

The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health
promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000,"
a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas.  This Request
for Applications (RFA), Human Genes for Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes
Mellitus, is related to the priority area of diabetes and chronic
disabling conditions.  Potential applicants may obtain a copy of
"Healthy People 2000" (Full Report: Stock No. 017-001-00474-0) or
"Healthy People 2000" (Summary Report:  Stock No. 017-001-00473-1)
through the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office,
Washington, DC 20402-9325 (telephone 202-783-3238).

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

Applications for research grants may be made by public and private,
foreign and domestic, for-profit and non-profit organizations, such as
universities, colleges, hospitals and laboratories, units or State and
local governments, and authorized units of the Federal Government.
Women and minority investigators are encouraged to apply.

MECHANISM OF SUPPORT

This RFA will use the NIH research project grant (R01).  Responsibility
for the planning, direction, and execution of the proposed project will
be solely that of the applicant.  The total project period for an
application submitted in response to the present RFA may not exceed
five years.  The anticipated award date is September 30, 1993.

For the purpose of cost-containment, requested direct costs must not
exceed $160,000 per year for any single application.  Applications
exceeding this limit will not be reviewed as part of this RFA.  The
average award made by the NIDDK is expected to be approximately
$200,000 in total costs.

This RFA is a one-time solicitation.  Future unsolicited competing
continuation applications will compete with all investigator-initiated
applications and be reviewed according to the customary peer review
procedures.

FUNDS AVAILABLE

Highly meritorious applications in response to this solicitation will
be partially funded by the NIDDK and partially funded by the ADA if
permission is given by the applicant.

The NIDDK will commit up to $2 million for first-year expenses and
additional funds for approved expenses in subsequent years for up to
five years to fund applications submitted in response to this RFA.  The
ADA anticipates support of up to 20 percent of recommended direct costs
for each funded application per year.  The NIDDK and the ADA plan to
make approximately 10 to 12 awards in FY 1993 contingent on the receipt
of highly meritorious applications in response to this solicitation.
With respect to post-award administration, the current policies and
requirements that govern the research grant programs of the NIH will
prevail for awards made by the NIDDK.  Applicants should note that
funds from the ADA will be subject to the indirect cost policy and
post-award administration policies of the ADA.  The award of grants
pursuant to this RFA is contingent on the availability of funds for
this purpose.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

Background

The term "diabetes" encompasses a number of different diseases, and
hence, a number of different genes may be involved.  Because of the
potential for complex interplay between several genes, novel approaches
may be necessary to ascertain the genes involved in the etiology of
diabetes.  The NIDDK recognizes this area as a high priority for
research and has taken steps to stimulate research in genetics and
molecular biology.  In addition, the National Diabetes Advisory Board,
in its "Long-Range Plan to Combat Diabetes, 1987," made several
recommendations to the NIDDK directed at increasing progress in this
area, including an increased emphasis on interdisciplinary research
collaboration.  In 1990, the NIDDK convened a scientific workshop to
address opportunities in the search for the diabetes genes.  The
participants analyzed the current state of knowledge and endorsed a
multifaceted and concerted effort to discover the genetic basis of
diabetes and its complications.

The NIDDK is coordinating efforts with the ADA to expeditiously and
efficiently achieve the goal of both organizations: identify genes
responsible for NIDDM.  Toward this end, the ADA has recently embarked
on the development of family pedigrees and the acquisition of genetic
resources to aid in the elucidation of human genes responsible for
NIDDM.

The last decade has witnessed an expansion in knowledge and scientific
methods allowing the isolation of genes responsible for a few but
growing number of severe human diseases, such as Duchenne muscular
dystrophy and Huntington's disease.  Most recently, a five-year effort
has culminated in the cloning and sequencing of the gene responsible
for cystic fibrosis.  This achievement has had a dramatic effect on
research into the cause and cure for cystic fibrosis.  Similar
scientific approaches are being directed toward the search for the
diabetes genes.

NIDDM affects approximately 13 million Americans.  It is the
predominant form of the disease and severely impacts upon U.S. minority
populations.  This clustering of prevalence among ethnic/racial groups
along with twin and family studies and animal models points to the
genetic nature of this disease.  Several genetic markers have been
described as being associated with a rare form of NIDDM called Maturity
Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) that shows autosomal dominant
inheritance.  One of these genetic markers is the gene for glucokinase,
a key enzyme of glucose homeostasis found in the insulin-secreting beta
cell of the pancreas and in the liver.  This is the first evidence that
a gene involved in glucose metabolism could be implicated in the
pathogenesis of NIDDM.  A variety of other genes may be related to the
long-term complications suffered by those with all forms of diabetes.
It will be worthwhile to apply a wide array of molecular biological
techniques to explore genes related to insulin secretion, insulin
action and key metabolic processes that regulate the body's metabolism.

It is important to identify specific genetic markers/elements that are
relevant to diabetes and its complications.  These markers can take the
form of genetic-susceptibility markers identifying the presence of
specific genetic loci that predispose an individual to the disease
and/or genetic mutations in key metabolic elements involved in the
pathogenesis of NIDDM.

Scope

Through this solicitation, the NIDDK and the ADA intend to stimulate
investigator-initiated research designed to develop and utilize new
molecular genetic strategies to provide a better understanding of the
major genes involved in NIDDM in humans.  To achieve this objective,
appropriate family pedigrees may need to be collected as a prerequisite
for the identification or for the verification of specific gene
involvement.  Since a large number of families may need to be
recruited, accumulation of these families must be included within the
framework of the proposed research plan.  Utilization of existing
sources of genetic material is encouraged.  For example, the ADA is
developing a repository of data, DNA, and cell lines of family
pedigrees with NIDDM.  This repository will be completed by the spring
of 1995 but data and cell samples will likely become available much
sooner.

It is anticipated that these results will elucidate mechanisms involved
in disease onset, thus enabling the development of specific
intervention therapies and the identification of individuals at risk
for the development of NIDDM.  Relevant research topics listed below
are examples and should not be construed as required or limiting.
Responsive applications to this solicitation include:

o  development of gene mapping strategies for the specific
identification and localization of genes for NIDDM

o  utilization of subtractive hybridization techniques to identify
pathophysiologic processes in NIDDM

o  employment of highly informative polymorphic markers such as
variable number repeat polymorphisms or microsatellite markers to
evaluate relevant family pedigrees.

Applications must propose the testing of an hypothesis rather than the
establishment of, for example, a genetic resource.

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

Upon initiation of this program, the NIDDK and the ADA will sponsor
periodic meetings to encourage exchange of information among
investigators, to foster collaborative efforts between program
grantees, and to identify resources that would enhance the productivity
of grantees.  For this purpose, requests for travel funds for a one day
meeting each year, probably to be held in the Washington, DC
metropolitan area, must be included in the budget section of the
application.  It is anticipated that the first meeting will be held
soon after the award of grants in order to discuss and establish the
nature and extent of possible collaboration among the group of
investigators.

Applicants should also include a statement in their applications
indicating their willingness to participate in such meetings.

Letter of Authorization

Each applicant must submit a brief statement to the NIDDK indicating
whether or not they wish their application to be considered for
coordinated funding by the ADA.  Although applicants may request that
their applications be considered only by the NIDDK and not by the ADA,
it is necessary that the record indicate the applicant's consideration
of this opportunity.  For each applicant who wishes to have the ADA
consider their application for coordinated funding, all materials
relating to the application will be promptly forwarded to that
organization by the NIDDK, and the summary statement for the
application will be shared with the ADA at the time of their
availability.  The NIDDK will provide no information to the ADA, nor
any other non-governmental agency, related to applications from any
applicant who requests that the ADA not consider their application.
Letters of authorization should be prepared by the Principal
Investigator and co-signed by the official signing for the applicant
organization.  This must be submitted as a cover letter accompanying
the application.

Whether or not an applicant wishes to be considered for coordinated
funding by the ADA will not effect the funding decisions of the NIDDK.

STUDY POPULATIONS

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS REGARDING IMPLEMENTATION OF NIH
POLICIES CONCERNING INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CLINICAL
RESEARCH STUDIES

NIH policy is that applicants for NIH clinical research grants and
cooperative agreements are required to include minorities and women in
study populations so that research findings can be of benefit to all
persons at risk of the disease, disorder or condition under study;
special emphasis should be placed on the need for inclusion of
minorities and women in studies of diseases, disorders and conditions
which disproportionately affect them.  This policy is intended to apply
to males and females of all ages.  If women or minorities are excluded
or inadequately represented in clinical research, particularly in
proposed population-based studies, a clear compelling rationale should
be provided.

The composition of the proposed study population must be described in
terms of gender and racial/ethnic group.  In addition, gender and
racial/ethnic issues must be addressed in developing a research design
and sample size appropriate for the scientific objectives of the study.
This information must be included in the form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91) in
Sections 1-4 of the Research Plan AND summarized in Section 5, Human
Subjects.  Applicants are urged to assess carefully the feasibility of
including the broadest possible representation of minority groups.
However, NIH recognizes that it may not be feasible or appropriate in
all research projects to include representation of the full array of
United States racial/ethnic minority populations (i.e., Native
Americans (including American Indians or Alaskan Natives),
Asian/Pacific Islanders, Blacks, Hispanics).

The rationale for studies on single minority population groups should
be provided.

For the purpose of this policy, clinical research is defined as human
biomedical and behavioral studies of etiology, epidemiology, prevention
(and preventative strategies), diagnosis, or treatment or diseases,
disorders or conditions, including but not limited to clinical trials.

The usual NIH policies concerning research on human subjects also
apply.  Basic research or clinical studies in which human tissues
cannot be identified or linked to individuals are excluded.  However,
every effort should be made to include human tissues from women and
racial/ethnic minorities when it is important to apply the results of
the study broadly, and this should be addressed by applicants.

For foreign awards, the policy on inclusion of women applies fully;
since the definition of minority differs in other countries, the
applicant must discuss the relevance of research involving foreign
population groups to the United States' populations, including
minorities.

If the required information is not contained within the application,
the application will be returned.

Peer reviewers will address specifically whether the research plan in
the application conforms to these policies.  If the representation of
women or minorities in a study design is inadequate to answer the
scientific question(s) addressed AND the justification for the selected
study population is inadequate, it will be considered a scientific
weakness or deficiency in the study design and reflected in assigning
the priority score to the application.

All applications for clinical research submitted to NIH are required to
address these policies.  NIH funding components will not award grants
or cooperative agreements that do not comply with these policies.

LETTER OF INTENT

Potential applicants are strongly encouraged to submit a letter of
intent by February 18, 1993.  The letter of intent is to include:  (1)
names of the Principal Investigator/program director and principal
collaborators, (2) descriptive title of the potential application, (3)
identification of the organization(s) involved, and (4) the number and
title of the RFA in response to which the application may be submitted.

Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does
not enter into the review of subsequent applications, the information
that it contains is helpful in planning for the review of applications.
It allows NIDDK staff to estimate the potential review workload and to
avoid conflict of interest in the review.

The letter of intent is to be sent to:

Chief, Review Branch
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Westwood Building, Room 605
5333 Westbard Avenue
Bethesda, MD  20892

APPLICATION PROCEDURES

Applications are to be submitted on form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91), that is
available from an applicant institution's office of sponsored research
and from the Office of Grants Inquiries, Division of Research Grants,
National Institutes of Health, Westwood Building, Room 449, Bethesda,
MD 20892, telephone (301) 496-7441.  Use the conventional format for
research project grant applications.  To identify the application as a
response to this RFA check "yes" on item 2a of page one of the
application and enter the title "Human Genes for NIDDM" and the RFA
number DK-93-10.

The RFA label included in the PHS 398 application package must be
affixed to the face page to assist in the processing of the
application.  Failure to use this label could result in the delayed
processing of the application such that it may not reach the review
committee in time for review.

Applicants from institutions that have a General Clinical Research
Center (GCRC) funded by the NIH National Center of Research Resources
may wish to identify the Center as a resource for conducting the
proposed research.  If so, a letter of agreement from the GCRC Program
Director should be included in the application material.

Applications must be received by March 17, 1993.  If an application is
received after that date, it will be returned to the applicant without
review.  The original, including the Checklist, and three signed
photocopies of the application must be submitted in one package to:

Division of Research Grants
National Institutes of Health
Westwood Building, Room 240
Bethesda, MD  20892**

At the time of submission, two additional copies of the application
must be sent under separate cover to:

Review Branch
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Westwood Building, Room 605
5333 Westbard Avenue
Bethesda, MD  20892

The Division of Research Grants (DRG) will not accept any application
in response to this announcement that is essentially the same as one
currently pending initial review, unless the applicant withdraws the
pending application.  The DRG will not accept any application that is
essentially the same as one already reviewed.  This does not preclude
the submission of substantial revisions of applications already
reviewed, but such applications must include an introduction addressing
the previous critique.

REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS

Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed by DRG staff for
completeness and by NIDDK staff for responsiveness.  Incomplete
applications will be returned to the applicant without further
consideration.  If the application is not responsive to the RFA, NIDDK
staff will contact the applicant to determine whether to return the
application to the applicant or submit it for review in competition
with unsolicited applications at the next review cycle.

Applications may be triaged by an NIDDK peer review group on the basis
of relative competitiveness.  The NIH will withdraw from further
competition those applications judged to be non-competitive for award
and notify the applicant Principal Investigator and institutional
official.  Those applications judged to be competitive will undergo
further scientific merit review.  Those applications that are complete
and responsive will be evaluated in accordance with the criteria stated
below for scientific/technical merit by an appropriate peer review
group convened by the NIDDK.  The second level of review will be
provided by the National Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Advisory Council.

Applications in response to this RFA will be reviewed using the usual
NIH peer review procedures.  The factors to be considered in the
evaluation of scientific merit of each application will be those used
in the review of traditional research project grant applications,
including the novelty, originality, and feasibility of the approach;
the training, experience, and research competence of the
investigator(s); the adequacy of the experimental design; the
suitability of the facilities; the appropriateness of the requested
budget to the work proposed; and the adherence, whenever appropriate,
to NIH guidelines concerning clinical research involving minorities and
women.

AWARD CRITERIA

The anticipated date of award is September 30, 1993.  The following
will be considered in making funding decisions:

o  Quality of the proposed project as determined by peer review
o  Availability of funds
o  Scientific interrelationships among the proposed projects.

INQUIRIES

Written and telephone inquiries concerning this RFA are encouraged.
The opportunity to clarify any issues or questions from potential
applicants is welcome.

Direct inquiries regarding programmatic issues to:

Joan T. Harmon, Ph.D.
Executive Director, Diabetes Research Program
Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Westwood Building, Room 622
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 496-7731

Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to:

Betty E. Bailey
Grants Management Branch
Division of Extramural Activities
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Westwood Building, Room 649
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 496-7467

Schedule:

Letter of Intent:               February 18, 1993
Application Receipt Date:       March 17, 1993
Initial Review:                 June/July 1993
NIDDK Advisory Council Review:  September 1993
Anticipated Award Date:         September 30, 1993

AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS

This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
No. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research.  Awards
are made under authorization of the Public Health Service Act, Title
IV, Part A (Public Law 78-410, as amended by Public Law 99-158, 42 USC
241 and 285) and administered under PHS grants policies and Federal
Regulations 42 CFR 52 and 45 CFR Part 74.  This program is not subject
to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372
or Health Systems Agency review.

From owner-sci-resources@net.bio.net Wed Dec 09 22:00:00 1992
Path: biosci!NET.BIO.NET!kristoff
From: kristoff@NET.BIO.NET (Dave Kristofferson)
Newsgroups: bionet.sci-resources
Subject: NIH Guide, vol. 21, no. 44, pt. 2, 11 December 1992
Message-ID: <CMM.0.90.2.723948105.kristoff@net.bio.net>
Date: 10 Dec 92 00:41:45 GMT
Sender: kristoff@net.bio.net
Distribution: bionet
Lines: 1500


$$XID NIHGUIDE 19921211 V21N44 P2O4 ************************************
returned to the applicant without further consideration.  If the
application is not responsive to the RFA, NHLBI staff will contact the
applicant to determine whether to return the application or submit it
for review in competition with unsolicited applications at the next
review cycle.

Applications judged to be responsive will be reviewed for scientific
and technical merit by an initial review group, convened by the
Division of Extramural Affairs, NHLBI, solely to review these
applications.  Review criteria for this RFA are generally the same as
those for unsolicited research grant applications.

INQUIRIES

Written and telephone inquiries regarding this RFA are encouraged.  The
opportunity to clarify any issues or questions from potential
applicants is welcome.

Direct inquiries regarding programmatic issues and requests for the RFA
to:

Hannah H. Peavy, M.D.
Division of Lung Diseases
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Westwood Building, Room 6A09
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 496-7034
FAX:  (301) 496-0886

Direct inquiries regarding review matters to:

Chief, Centers and Special Projects Review Section
Review Branch, Division of Extramural Affairs
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Westwood Building, Room 553
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 496-7351
FAX:  (301) 402-1660

Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to:

Raymond L. Zimmerman
Division of Extramural Affairs
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Westwood Building, Room 4A17
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 496-4970
FAX:  (301) 402-1200

AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS

This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance, No. 93.838.  Grants will be awarded under the authority of
the Public Health Service Act, Title III, Section 301 (Public Law
78-410, as amended: 42 USC 241) and administered under PHS grants
policies and Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 45 CFR Part 74.
This program is not subject to the intergovernmental review
requirements of Executive Order 12372 or to review by a Health Systems
Agency.

$$R7 END ************************************************************

$$R8 BEGIN AR-93-01 FULL-TEXT ***************************************

JUVENILE RHEUMATIC DISEASES RESEARCH CENTER PLANNING GRANT

NIH GUIDE, Volume 21, Number 44, December 11, 1992

RFA AVAILABLE:  AR-93-01

P.T. 34; K.W. 0715170, 0715010, 0710030

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases

Letter of Intent Receipt Date:  March 1, 1993
Application Receipt Date:  April 20, 1993

THE REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS (RFA) ANNOUNCED IN THIS NOTICE CONTAINS
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN APPLICATION.  POTENTIAL
APPLICANTS MAY OBTAIN THE RFA AND GUIDELINES FROM THE CONTACT NAME IN
INQUIRIES, BELOW.

PURPOSE

The National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin
Diseases (NIAMS) invites applications for a planning grant for a
juvenile arthritis and musculoskeletal diseases center.

The goal of the planning grant is to explore the potential for
establishing a Juvenile Rheumatic Diseases Research Center (JRDRC).
The JRDRC planning grant will support development of key
multidisciplinary research areas needed to establish a JRDRC.

A JRDRC is envisioned to be a resource center for research in juvenile
arthritis and musculoskeletal diseases.  This center will be associated
with a major medical complex or consortium and will work in furthering
the research effort related to juvenile arthritis and musculoskeletal
diseases.

HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000

The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health
promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000,"
a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas.  This RFA,
Juvenile Rheumatic Diseases Research Center Planning Grant, is related
to the priority area of chronic disabling conditions.  Potential
applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2000" (Full Report:
Stock No. 017-001-00474-0) or "Healthy People 2000" (Summary Report:
Stock No. 017-001-00473-1) through the Superintendent of Documents,
Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (telephone
202-783-3238).

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

Applications may be submitted by domestic, for-profit and non-profit
organizations, public and private, such as universities, colleges,
hospitals, laboratories, units of State and local governments and
eligible agencies of the Federal government.  An established clinical
and research program in areas pertaining to juvenile arthritis and
musculoskeletal diseases should be present.

MECHANISM OF SUPPORT

This RFA will use the National Institutes of Health (NIH) planning
grant (P20).  Responsibility for the planning, direction, and execution
of the proposed project will be solely that of the applicant.  The
total project period for applications submitted in response to the
present RFA should be three years.  The anticipated award date is
September 30, 1993.  The direct costs requested cannot exceed $200,000
each year.  The award will not be renewed, but may be converted to
another funding mechanism.

FUNDS AVAILABLE

The estimated funds (total costs) available for the first year of
support for the JRDRC planning grant is $300,000.  One award is
anticipated.  Funding will depend on receiving applications judged
highly meritorious by peer review.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

Chronic rheumatic diseases represent an important entity among chronic
conditions affecting children.  Among the rheumatic diseases seen in
juvenile populations are rheumatoid arthritis, chronic arthritis
(systemic, polyarthritic, and pauciarticular), spondyloarthropathy,
systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, scleroderma and other
vasculopathies and connective tissues disorders.  Many childhood
rheumatic diseases have orthopaedic aspects.  A research agenda for the
genetic, infectious, and immunologic aspects of juvenile rheumatic
diseases will benefit from a multidisciplinary approach.  Because the
research issues are complex for juvenile arthritis and musculoskeletal
diseases, the NIAMS seeks to explore the potential for establishing a
JRDRC through a planning grant.

The planning grant for a JRDRC will provide funds for an administrative
and planning core and for pilot studies to develop and expand the
research base.  Appropriate research areas include basic, clinical, and
epidemiologic research as well as educational and psychosocial
research.

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

Investigators will be asked to meet periodically with NIAMS staff in
Bethesda to review progress and plans for future work.  The planning
center will work with the NIAMS to hold a workshop to review the
research agenda for juvenile arthritis.  Applicants should include in
the budget plans, appropriate travel costs for these meetings.

STUDY POPULATIONS

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CLINICAL
RESEARCH STUDIES

For projects involving clinical research, NIH requires applicants to
give special attention to the inclusion of women and minorities in
study populations.  If women or minorities are not included in the
study populations for clinical studies, a specific justification for
this exclusion must be provided.  Applications without such
documentation will not be accepted for review.

LETTER OF INTENT

Prospective applicants are asked to submit, by March 1, 1993, a letter
of intent that includes a descriptive title of the proposed research
projects, the name, address, and telephone number of the Principal
Investigator, the identities of other key personnel and participating
institutions, and the number and title of the RFA in response to which
the application may be submitted.

Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does
not enter into the review of subsequent applications, the information
that it contains allows NIAMS staff to estimate the potential review
workload and to avoid conflict of interest in the review.

The letter of intent is to be sent to Dr. Julia B. Freeman at the
address listed under INQUIRIES.

APPLICATION PROCEDURES

The research grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91) is to be used
in applying for these grants.  These forms are available at most
institutional offices of sponsored research and from the Office of
Grants Inquiries, Division of Research Grants, National Institutes of
Health, 5333 Westbard Avenue, Room 449, Bethesda, MD 20892, telephone
301/496-7441.

Special guidelines have been developed for the JRDRC planning grant.
These guidelines must be used in writing and assembling the
application.  The guidelines may be obtained by contacting the Centers
Program Director listed under INQUIRIES.

Applications must be received by April 20, 1993.  The RFA label
available in the application form must be affixed to the bottom of the
face page of the application.  Failure to use this label could result
in delayed processing of the application such that it may not reach the
review committee in time for review.  In addition, the RFA title and
number must be typed on line 2a of the face page of the application
form and the YES box must be marked.

REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS

Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed for completeness by
Division of Research Grants (DRG) and responsiveness by the NIAMS.
Incomplete applications will be returned to the applicant without
further consideration.

Applications may be triaged by an NIAMS peer review group on the basis
of relative competitiveness.  The NIH will withdraw from further
competition those applications judged to be non-competitive for award
and notify the applicant Principal Investigator and institutional
official.

Review criteria for RFAs are generally the same as those for
unsolicited research grant applications.

Additional scientific/technical merit criteria specific to the
objectives of the JRDRC program include:

o  qualifications, experience and commitment of the Director (Principal
Investigator) and his/her ability to devote time and effort to provide
effective leadership;

o  scientific and administrative structure, including internal and
external procedures for monitoring and evaluating the proposed research
and for providing ongoing quality control and scientific review;

o  adequacy of plans for interaction among investigators, and the
integration of the various projects and core units; and

o  potential for developing a JRDRC from the resources and projects
described.

AWARD CRITERIA

The anticipated date of award is September 30, 1993.

INQUIRIES

Written and telephone inquiries concerning this RFA are encouraged.
The opportunity to clarify any issues or questions from potential
applicants is welcome.

Direct inquiries regarding programmatic issues to:

Dr. Julia B. Freeman
Centers Program, Extramural Programs
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
Westwood Building, Room 403
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 402-3348
FAX:  (301) 480-7881

Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to:

Mara H. DeKemper
Grants Management Officer
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
Westwood Building, Room 732
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 496-0552

AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS

This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
No. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research.
Awards will be made under the authority of the Public Health Service
Act, Title III, Section 301 (Public Law 410, 78th Congress, as amended,
42 USC 241) and administered under PHS grant policies and Federal
regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 45 CFR Part 74.  This program is not
subject to intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order
12372 or Health Systems Agency review.

$$R8 END ************************************************************

$$R9 BEGIN AR-93-03 FULL-TEXT ***************************************

SKIN DISEASES RESEARCH CORE CENTERS

NIH GUIDE, Volume 21, Number 44, December 11, 1992

RFA AVAILABLE:  AR-93-03

P.T. 04; K.W. 0715185, 1003002, 0710070, 0710030

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases

Letter of Intent Receipt Date:  May 10, 1993
Application Receipt Date:  June 18, 1993

THE REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS (RFA) ANNOUNCED IN THIS NOTICE CONTAINS
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN APPLICATION.  POTENTIAL
APPLICANTS MAY OBTAIN THE RFA FROM THE CONTACT NAMED IN INQUIRIES,
BELOW.

PURPOSE

The National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin
Diseases (NIAMS) invites applications for research core centers in skin
diseases.  The Skin Diseases Research Centers (SDRCs) will provide the
resources for a number of established, currently funded investigators,
often from different disciplines, to adopt a multidisciplinary approach
to common research problems in skin diseases and to ensure greater
productivity than from each of the separate projects.

HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000

The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health
promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000,"
a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas.  This RFA, Skin
Diseases Research Core Centers, is related to the priority area of
chronic disabling conditions.  Potential applicants may obtain a copy
of "Healthy People 2000" (Full Report: Stock No. 017-001-00474-0) or
"Healthy People 2000" (Summary Report:  Stock No. 017-001-00473-1)
through the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office,
Washington, DC 20402-9325 (telephone 202-783-3238).

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

Applications may be submitted by domestic for-profit and non-profit
organizations, public and private, such as universities, colleges,
hospitals, laboratories, units of State and local governments, and
eligible agencies of the Federal Government.  A strong clinical and
research program in skin diseases should be present.  Foreign
organizations are not eligible.  Applications from minority individuals
and women are encouraged.

MECHANISM OF SUPPORT

This RFA will use the National Institutes of Health (NIH) core research
center grant (P30).  Responsibility for the planning, direction, and
execution of the proposed project will be solely that of the applicant.
The total project period for applications submitted in response to this
RFA should be five years.  The direct costs requested cannot exceed
$400,000 each year.  The anticipated award date is March 1, 1994.

FUNDS AVAILABLE

The NIAMS intends to fund two SDRCs in FY 1994, subject to the
availability of resources and receipt of sufficiently meritorious
applications.  The estimated funds (total costs) available for the
first year of support is $1.0 million.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

Research in skin diseases is at a stage where broad advances can be
effectively fostered by research core centers.  Examples of these areas
include, but are not limited to:

o  stratum corneum: biochemistry, structure, function
o  epidermis: differentiation, keratinization, cellular constituents
o  dermal-epidermal junction: structure, functions, diseases
o  skin as an immunological organ
o  autoimmune skin diseases
o  dermis: structural components, diseases

The choice of research problem upon which the SDRC would focus is made
by the principal and collaborating currently funded investigators.

The SDRC (P30) is a mechanism for integrating, coordinating, and
fostering the interdisciplinary cooperation of a group of established
investigators conducting programs of active, high-quality research that
relate to a common theme.  The SDRC provides support for:

1.  Core resources and facilities to be used by investigators of
individually supported research projects in order to enhance and
coordinate their activities.  This support may include personnel,
equipment, supplies, services, and facilities.

2.  Limited funds for pilot and feasibility studies.

3.  Program enrichment activities.

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

Specific guidelines have been developed for the SDRC application and
program.  These guidelines may be obtained from the contact person
listed under INQUIRIES.

STUDY POPULATIONS

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CLINICAL
RESEARCH STUDIES

For projects involving clinical research, NIH requires applicants to
give special attention to the inclusion of women and minorities in
study populations.  If women or minorities are not included in the
study populations for clinical studies, a specific justification for
this exclusion must be provided.  Applications without such
documentation will not be accepted for review.

LETTER OF INTENT

Prospective applicants are asked to submit, by May 10, 1993, a letter
of intent that includes a descriptive title of the proposed research,
the name, address, and telephone number of the Principal Investigator,
the identities of other key personnel and participating institutions,
and the number and title of the RFA in response to which the
application may be submitted.

Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does
not enter into the review of subsequent applications, the information
that it contains allows the NIAMS staff to estimate the potential
review workload and to avoid possible conflict of interest in the
review.

The letter of intent is to be sent to:

Dr. Julia B. Freeman
Centers Program, EP
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
Westwood Building, Room 403
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 402-3348
FAX:  (301) 480-7881

APPLICATION PROCEDURES

Special guidelines have been developed for the SDRC program in NIAMS.
These guidelines must be used in assembling the application.  These
guidelines may be obtained by contacting the Centers Program Director
listed above.

The research grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91) is to be used
in applying for these grants.  These forms are available at most
institutional offices of sponsored research and from the Office of
Grants Inquiries, Division of Research Grants, National Institutes of
Health, 5333 Westbard Avenue, Room 449, Bethesda, MD 20892, telephone
301/496-7441.

Applications must be received by June 18, 1993.  The RFA label
available in the PHS 398 application form must be affixed to the bottom
of the face page of the application.

REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS

Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed for completeness by the DRG
and responsiveness by NIAMS.  Incomplete applications will be returned
to the applicant without further consideration.

Applications may be triaged by an NIAMS peer review group on the basis
of relative competitiveness.  The NIAMS will withdraw from further
competition those applications judged to be noncompetitive for award
and notify the applicant Principal Investigator and institutional
official.  Those applications judged to be competitive will undergo
further scientific merit review.  This review will be for
scientific/technical merit by an appropriate peer review group convened
by the NIAMS.  The second level of review will be provided by the
National Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Advisory
Council.

AWARD CRITERIA

The primary factors determining the award will be the priority score
and the availability of funds.  Since the NIAMS is interested in
funding only the best research, individual research projects of lesser
quality may not be funded, even if approved, under the "umbrella" of
the SDRC mechanism.

INQUIRIES

Written and telephone requests for the RFA and the opportunity to
clarify any issues or questions from potential applicants are welcome.

Direct requests for the RFA and inquiries regarding programmatic issues
to:

Dr. Julia B. Freeman
Centers Program, EP
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
Westwood Building, Room 403
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 402-3348
FAX:  (301) 480-7881

Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to:

Mary L. Graham
Grants Management Officer
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
Westwood Building, Room 722A
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 402-3361

AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS

This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
No. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research.
Awards will be made under the authority of the Public Health Service
Act, Title III, Section 301 (Public Law 410, 78th Congress, as amended,
42 USC 241) and administered under PHS grants policies and Federal
regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 45 CFR Part 74.  This program is not
subject to intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order
12372 or Health Systems Agency review.

$$R9 END ************************************************************

$$R10 BEGIN HL-93-07 FULL-TEXT **************************************

MONOENERGETIC X-RAY SYSTEMS FOR CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING

NIH GUIDE, Volume 21, Number 44, December 11, 1992

RFA AVAILABLE:  HL-93-07-H

P.T. 34; K.W. 0706030, 0705015

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Letter of Intent Receipt Date:  July 5, 1993
Application Receipt Date:  October 13, 1993

THE REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS (RFA) ANNOUNCED IN THIS NOTICE CONTAINS
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN APPLICATION.  POTENTIAL
APPLICANTS MAY OBTAIN THE RFA FROM THE CONTACT NAMED IN INQUIRIES,
BELOW.

PURPOSE

This solicitation will support grants for research and development of
monoenergetic (10-20 eV) x-ray sources that can be hospital based and
are clinically applicable for imaging cardiovascular structures.  It is
desirable that the proposed imaging system be tuneable with spectral
concentration in a narrow band and at an intensity appropriate for
specific cardiovascular imaging applications.  A principal objective is
to achieve improved image quality at lower radiation dose as compared
with conventional x-ray imaging systems.

HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000

The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health
promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000,"
a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas.  This RFA,
Monoenergetic X-ray Systems for Cardiovascular Imaging is related to
the priority area of cardiovascular imaging.  Potential applicants may
obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2000" (Full Report:  Stock No.
017-001-00474-0) or "Healthy People 2000" (Summary Report:  Stock No.
017-002-00473-1) through the Superintendent of Documents, Government
Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (telephone 202-783-3238).

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

Applications may be submitted by domestic and foreign for-profit and
non-profit organizations, public and private, such as universities,
colleges, hospitals, laboratories, units of State and local
governments, and eligible agencies of the Federal government.  Federal
agencies must ensure that their own authorizing legislation will allow
them to respond to this solicitation and to receive a PHS grant.
Applications from minorities and women are encouraged.

MECHANISM OF SUPPORT

This RFA will use the National Institutes of Health (NIH) individual
research grant (R01).  Responsibility for the planning, direction, and
execution of the proposed project will be solely that of the applicant.
The total project period for applications submitted in response to the
present RFA may not exceed five years.  This RFA is a one-time
solicitation.  Future unsolicited competing continuation applications
will compete with all investigator-initiated applications and be
reviewed according to customary peer review procedures.  Because the
nature and scope of the research proposed in response to this RFA may
vary, it is anticipated that the size of an award will vary also.

FUNDS AVAILABLE

Approximately $1.5 million in total costs will be provided for the
first year of support for the entire program.  It is anticipated that
three to four new grants will be awarded under this program.  This
level of support is dependent on the receipt of a sufficient number of
applications of high scientific merit.  Although this program is
provided for in the financial plan of the National Heart, Lung, and
Blood Institute (NHLBI), awards pursuant to this RFA are contingent
upon the availability of funds for this purpose. Administrative
adjustments in project period and/or amount of support may be required
at the time of the award.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

The proposed RFA seeks to support grant applications to study, develop,
and evaluate minimally invasive x-ray systems using monoenergetic
radiation to achieve improved resolution and image quality.  Complete
systems would need to be described, including both source and detector.
Grant applications should propose a specific application, such as
coronary artery imaging without intraarterial injection of contrast
material, and include quantitative objectives for resolution, patient
dose, and image quality.  Grant applications should also emphasize
close collaboration among physicists, biophysicists, radiologists,
cardiologists, and bioengineers with both a theoretical basis and an
experimental plan for the proposed system.

Grant applications may propose research in imaging systems for
cardiovascular application utilizing monoenergetic or nearly
monoenergetic x-ray sources and detector systems, including, but not
limited to, the following technologies:

o  Transition x-ray sources
o  Channeling radiation sources
o  Cerenkov radiation sources
o  Smith-Purcell radiation sources
o  Parametric conversion systems
o  Coherent superlattice radiation systems
o  Free electron Laser systems

Each application must provide evidence that the proposed system is
feasible as a hospital based facility, with size and cost estimates
based upon calculations and experimental data.

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CLINICAL
RESEARCH STUDIES

For projects involving clinical research, NIH requires applicants to
give special attention to the inclusion of women and minorities in
study populations.  If women or minorities are not included in the
study populations for clinical studies, a specific justification for
this exclusion must be provided.  Applications without such
documentation will not be accepted for review.

LETTER OF INTENT

Prospective applicants are asked to submit, by July 5, 1993, a letter
of intent that includes a descriptive title of the proposed research,
the name, address, and telephone number of the Principal Investigator,
the identities of other key personnel and participating institutions,
and the number and title of this RFA.

Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does
not enter into the review of subsequent applications, the information
that it contains allows NHLBI staff to estimate the potential review
workload and to avoid conflict of interest in the review.

The letter of intent is to be sent to:

Chief, Centers and Special Projects Section
Review Branch
Division of Extramural Affairs
National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute
Westwood Building, Room 553A
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 496-7351
FAX:  (301) 402-1660

APPLICATION PROCEDURES

The research grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91) is to be used
in applying for these grants. These forms are available at most
institutional offices of sponsored research and may be obtained from
the Office of Grants Inquiries, Division of Research Grants, National
Institutes of Health, Westwood Building, Room 449, Bethesda, MD 20892,
telephone 301/496-7441.

Send or deliver a signed, typewritten original of the application,
including the checklist, and three signed photocopies, in one package
to:

Division of Research Grants
National Institutes of Health
Westwood Building, Room 240
Bethesda, MD  20892**

Send two additional copies of the application to the Chief, Centers and
Special Projects Section, at the address listed under LETTERS OF
INTENT.

Applications must be received by October 13, 1993.

REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS

Those applications that are complete and responsive will be evaluated
for scientific/technical merit by an appropriate peer review group
convened by the NHLBI.  The second level of review will be provided by
the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Advisory Council.

Review criteria for RFAs are generally the same as those for
unsolicited research grant applications. Although multidisciplinary
approaches are encouraged, it is not the intent of this announcement to
solicit applications for large studies that encompass a variety of
independent projects, i.e., program projects.

AWARD CRITERIA

The most important criterion in selecting awardees will be the
scientific merit.  However, factors such as program balance and
available funds may enter into selection from among competing
applications.

The anticipated date of award is April 1, 1994

INQUIRIES

Inquiries regarding programmatic issues and requests for the RFA
document be directed to:

Dr. Alan Berson or Dr. Rosalie Dunn
Devices and Technology Branch
Division of Heart and Vascular Diseases
National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute
Federal Building, Room 312
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 496-1586

Direct inquiries regarding fiscal and administrative matters to:

Mr. William Darby
Grants Operations Branch
Division of Extramural Affairs
National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute
Westwood Building, Room 4A11
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 496-7536

AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS

This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
No. 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases.  Awards will be made under the
authority of the Public Health Service Act, Section 301 (42 USC 241)
and administered under PHS grants policies and Federal Regulations,
most specifically 42 CFR 52 and 45 CFR Part 74.  This program is not
subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order
12372 or to Health Systems Agency review.

$$R10 END ***********************************************************

                    ONGOING PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENTS

$$P1 BEGIN PA-93-27 *************************************************

PSYCHOTHERAPY, BEHAVIOR THERAPY, AND COUNSELING IN DRUG DEPENDENCE
TREATMENT

NIH GUIDE, Volume 21, Number 44, December 11, 1992

PA NUMBER:  PA-93-27

P.T. 34; K.W. 0745060, 0404009, 0414014

National Institute on Drug Abuse

PURPOSE

The purpose of this Program Announcement (PA) is to encourage the study
of psychotherapy, behavior therapy, drug abuse counseling, and other
psychosocial interventions in the treatment of drug abuse and
dependence.  Studies involving the use of controlled clinical trials or
other scientifically established research methods are encouraged.  A
secondary aim is to encourage the development of instruments to measure
the process and outcome of psychotherapy/counseling of drug addicts and
instruments that may be useful in determining therapist and patient
characteristics predictive of treatment outcome.  This announcement is
intended to encourage the investigation of the treatment of individuals
who are dependent upon cocaine, opiates, and other types of drugs
(including polydrug abusers).  This announcement is not intended to
support therapy development research.

HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000

The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health
promotion and disease prevention objectives of Healthy People 2000, a
PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas.  This PA,
Psychotherapy, Behavior Therapy, and Counseling in Drug Dependence
Treatment, is related to the priority area of alcohol and other drugs.
Potential applicants may obtain a copy of Healthy People 2000 (Full
Report:  Stock No. 017-001-00474-0 or Summary Report:  Stock No.
017-001-00473-1) through the Superintendent of Documents, Government
Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (telephone 202-783-3238).

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

Applications may be submitted by foreign and domestic, for-profit and
non-profit organizations, public and private, such as universities,
colleges, hospitals, laboratories, units of State and local
governments, and eligible agencies of the Federal government.
Applications from minority individuals and women are encouraged.
Foreign applicants are not eligible for First Independent Research
Support and Transition (FIRST) awards (R29).

MECHANISM OF SUPPORT

Support mechanisms include:  research projects (R01), small grants
(R03), and FIRST awards (R29).  Most investigator-initiated research is
supported by regular research grants.  Research grants are awarded to
institutions on behalf of Principal Investigators who have designed and
will direct a specific project or set of projects.  Except for small
grants (R03) and FIRST awards (R29), investigator(s) may apply for a
renewal (competing continuation) of the project by submitting an
application for further support, including a report of progress and
including specific plans for future work.  For details on a particular
support mechanism or program, contact the program staff listed under
INQUIRIES.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

Background

Some form of psychotherapy, behavior therapy, or drug abuse counseling
occurs in virtually every type of drug abuse/dependence treatment.
Even where effective pharmacological treatments exist, such as the use
of methadone for opiate dependence, they are usually administered with
appropriate psychosocial/behavioral interventions (Grabowski et al.,
1984).

Numerous behavioral interventions have been studied in attempts to
improve the efficacy of drug abuse treatment.  Contingency management
has been shown to have some efficacy in medically withdrawing patients
from methadone (Higgins et al., 1986) for some methadone-maintained
individuals, but not all (Stitzer et al., 1986; Iguchi et al., 1988;
Stitzer et al., 1992).  Where the methadone dose has been decreased as
a consequence to drug positive urine specimens, treatment dropout has
been exacerbated (Stitzer et al., 1986; Iguchi et al., 1988).  While it
has been suggested that the use of "negative incentives" increases
dropout rate, the extent to which the observed increases in dropout
rate are due to methadone dose reduction per se has not been
established.

Operant behavioral interventions appear to be most effective when
integrated into a complete treatment package, as in the Community
Reinforcement Approach (Hunt & Azrin, 1973; Azrin, 1976).  This
approach, originally developed for alcoholics, has been modified for
cocaine abusers and has shown promise (Higgins et al., 1991).

Behavioral interventions based upon principles of classical
conditioning, such as cue exposure, are also believed to have promise.
When used as an adjunct to a comprehensive outpatient cocaine treatment
program, patients given repeated cue exposure (to induce "extinction"
to cocaine-related cues) evidenced better retention in treatment and
fewer cocaine-positive urine specimens than patients not receiving the
cue exposure (Childress, et al., 1992).

Individual cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic as well as family
approaches have all been demonstrated to have some efficacy (Stanton et
al., 1982; Woody et al., 1983, 1987; Rounsaville et al., 1983; Carroll
et al., 1991), but none has been demonstrated consistently to be more
effective than another.  This is congruent with findings in the
psychotherapy research field at large; that is, it has not been
consistently demonstrated that one type of psychotherapy is more
effective than another (Luborsky et al., 1975; Smith & Glass 1977;
Lambert et al., 1986; Stiles et al., 1986).

For particular subgroups of patients, however, there is reason to
believe that particular types of therapies may be more useful than
others.  For example, there is some evidence that a structured,
behavioral therapy may be more effective for substance abusers with
sociopathic characteristics than an interactionally focused therapy
(Kadden et al., 1989).  In subgroups of patients with antisocial
personality disorder who have an additional diagnosis of depression,
cognitive-behavioral and supportive-expressive psychotherapy appears to
be of some benefit.  However, antisocial personality disorder alone
appears to be a negative indicator for response to psychotherapy (Woody
et al., 1985).  There is also some evidence that the addition of
psychotherapy to drug abuse counseling may be necessary for other
subgroups of addicts.  For example, in a methadone-maintenance program,
drug abuse counseling is a sufficient complement to the treatment of
opiate addicts with low levels of psychiatric severity.  Providing
psychotherapy to low psychiatric severity methadone-maintained opiate
addicts who are already receiving drug abuse counseling does not appear
to yield any further benefit (Woody et al., 1984).  However, in
methadone-maintained opiate addicts with high levels of psychiatric
severity, psychotherapy in addition to drug abuse counseling is
significantly more effective than drug counseling alone (Woody et al.,
1984).

Inherent in doing research on psychosocial treatments for drug
dependence are substantial methodological difficulties.  Attrition is
a problem in any form of behavioral treatment research, but especially
so in drug dependence treatment.  While there are numerous statistical
procedures for dealing with the problem of attrition (Howard et al.,
1990), none can replace lost data.  It is, therefore, important to be
aware of the ramifications of utilizing the array of available
statistical techniques that are sometimes used to partially "correct"
for lost data.  Defining and including control groups as opposed to
comparison groups (Borkovec, 1990) also presents a dilemma in
comparative psychosocial treatment research.  While there is no
"perfect" design in such research, there are more or less perfect
designs depending upon the research question we are asking.  Other
methodological and statistical issues, such as those dealing with
therapist/counselor variance (Crits-Christoph et al., 1990) and
choosing appropriate outcome measures (Lambert, 1990) are also
important considerations and have been discussed at length elsewhere
(Onken and Blaine, 1990).

Additional research is needed to answer a number of questions in this
field such as:

1.  Are certain strategies of drug abuse counseling/psychotherapy more
effective than others in helping individuals achieve treatment goals?

2.  In what way are various immediate treatment goals related to
long-term outcome goals?

3.  What is the relative efficacy of drug abuse counseling versus
psychotherapy, and when and with whom is drug abuse counseling
sufficient?

4.  What populations of drug addicts (e.g., the dually diagnosed,
racial and ethnic minorities, women, adolescents, etc.) require what
types of counseling or psychotherapy?

5.  How is the process of psychotherapy or counseling related to
outcome in drug dependence treatment?

6.  What are the characteristics of successful therapists, patients,
and therapist/patient pairs?

Specific Areas of Interest:

1.  Development of Psychotherapy/Counseling Instruments and Research
Methods.  Psychotherapy research, particularly with drug addicts, is in
an early stage of development.  The development and the refinement of
instruments and methods that measure the theoretical constructs in the
fields of psychotherapy and counseling are needed.  Without instruments
that measure these constructs in a valid and reliable manner, the
controlled, scientific study of psychotherapy and counseling is
impossible.

Investigators are encouraged to develop new instruments and refine
existing instruments from the mental health field that can be used in
controlled psychotherapy/counseling research studies with drug addicts.
The development of valid and reliable instruments that measure various
aspects of the process and strategies of psychotherapy/counseling, the
immediate goals and outcome of these treatments, therapist
characteristics predictive of treatment outcome, and patient
characteristics predictive of outcome are encouraged.

2.  Comparative Psychosocial Treatment Research with Drug Addicts.
Controlled clinical trials that examine the relative efficacy of
psychotherapy, behavior therapy, counseling, pharmacotherapy, and the
many combinations of these forms of treatment with various populations
of drug addicts are encouraged.  The goal of such comparative treatment
research is not to determine which treatments "win," but, rather to
determine which treatments are most efficacious with which populations,
and under what conditions.  Studies that investigate the relative
efficacy of individual, group, or family psychotherapy, behavior
therapy, and drug abuse counseling in patients with various co-morbid
Axis I and Axis II disorders are particularly encouraged.
Investigations that compare the efficacy of one form or combination of
psychotherapy, behavior therapy, or counseling to another in other
subpopulations of drug addicts (e.g., racial and ethnic minorities,
pregnant women, and individuals who abuse cocaine intravenously) are
also encouraged.  Where effective pharmacotherapies are available,
research projects that attempt to maximize the efficacy of that
pharmacotherapy through integration with psychosocial treatment are
encouraged.

Applicants proposing comparative psychosocial treatment research
studies are encouraged to examine the interactions of relevant
therapist/patient characteristics with therapy type and to assess the
relative contribution of therapist, patient, and type of therapy to
treatment outcome.

For these studies, it is imperative that investigators accurately
measure and control for the psychiatric diagnosis and problem severity
level of the patients.  It is also necessary that clear definitions of
treatment outcome variables be specified, and that valid and reliable
measures of outcome be used.  It is recommended that
therapists/counselors providing the treatment be systematically
trained, that manuals be used to guide the treatments, that valid and
reliable therapist competence and adherence scales be used, and that
the treatment process be measured accurately.  For all efficacy
studies, it is recommended that adequate followup assessments be
planned.  It is also important that these studies use procedures and
methods that can be replicated.  It is strongly suggested that pilot
data showing that a counseling or psychotherapy strategy is promising
be provided when proposing comparative research involving this
treatment.  These pilot data should indicate that the utilization of
the therapy approach shows promise in its ability to produce a decrease
in drug use, dropout rate, or psychiatric symptoms.

3.  Research on Therapist and Patient Variables in Psychotherapy and
Counseling.  Researchers have highlighted the importance of individual
differences among therapists and counselors independent of the form of
treatment.  Some studies have shown that certain therapists/counselors
are more successful than others, and that this success is more related
to the treatment provider than to the type of treatment provided (e.g.,
McLellan et al., 1988).  Studies are sought that assess therapist
and/or counselor characteristics and relate these characteristics to
effective treatment.  Studies that examine the interaction of
therapist/counselor and patient variables as related to outcome are
also encouraged.  Additionally, studies that link the characteristics
of patients with successful psychotherapeutic, behavioral, or drug
abuse counseling treatment are desired.  Measurements of therapist and
patient characteristics should be obtained using psychometrically sound
instruments.  These studies should control for the type of treatment
offered and should use objective, empirical measures of the treatment
process that occurs.

4.  Short-Term vs. Long-Term Goals of Drug Abuse
Counseling/Psychotherapy/Behavior Therapy.  The treatment process may
be viewed as having two distinctive but interrelated sets of goals.
One set involves long-term objectives to be achieved as a result of
involvement in the treatment program.  These goals include reduction in
illicit drug use, reduction in illegal activities, improvement in
social adjustment, etc.  The other set of goals involves specific
objectives to be achieved within the treatment program that, it is
assumed, will allow clients to attain the long-term treatment goals.
These immediate goals include assisting the client in recognizing the
harm caused by drug dependence, developing personal strategies for
reducing or avoiding stress, recognizing irrational ideas or beliefs,
developing realistic strategies for interpreting life events, etc.

Research is needed to determine how immediate treatment goals are
related to long-term treatment goals (i.e., how success in achieving
goals within treatment is related to success in achieving goals that
result from treatment).  For example, investigators may wish to
establish different measures of immediate treatment goals, evaluate
clients on success in achieving those goals, and then relate success in
attaining immediate treatment goals to outcome measures of drug use or
social adjustment.  Research is also needed to identify, operationally
define, and compare the efficacy of different strategies for attaining
immediate treatment goals.  For example, investigators may wish to
establish different measures of immediate treatment goals, evaluate
clients on success in achieving those goals, and then relate success in
attaining immediate treatment goals to outcome measures of drug use or
social adjustment.  Also, investigators may wish to establish two
distinctive procedures for achieving stress management (or employment)
by clients and then compare the efficacy of the two procedures in terms
of stress management.  Controlled clinical trials or other rigorous
research methods should be used.

5.  Component Analysis Research.  Knowing the effective components of
treatment can greatly aid in improving the quality of treatment.
Theoretically based research that attempts to determine the effective
components or combination of components in drug dependence
psychotherapies, behavior therapies, or counseling strategies is
encouraged.

Where there is more than one way to answer a proposed research
question, investigators are urged to state their theoretical, ethical,
and practical reasons for choosing one research design over another
(see Borkovec, 1990).  Investigators should address the issues of
selection bias and attrition (Howard et al., 1990), and any other
pertinent methodological issues (see Onken and Blaine, 1990).

If a subject is identified as being at risk for HIV acquisition and/or
transmission, HIV testing and counseling should be offered to the
subject in accordance with current guidelines. Furthermore, in
high-risk populations, investigators are encouraged to assess the
effect of the new therapy on the acquisition/ transmission of
associated infectious disease, including HIV.

STUDY POPULATION

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS REGARDING IMPLEMENTATION OF NIH
POLICIES CONCERNING INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CLINICAL
RESEARCH STUDY POPULATIONS

NIH policy is that applicants for NIH clinical research grants and
cooperative agreements will be required to include minorities and women
in study populations so that research findings can be of benefit to all
persons at risk of the disease, disorder or condition under study;
special emphasis should be placed on the need for inclusion of
minorities and women in studies of diseases, disorders and conditions
which disproportionately affect them.  This policy is intended to apply
to males and females of all ages.  If women or minorities are excluded
or inadequately represented in clinical research, particularly in
proposed population-based studies, a clear compelling rationale should
be provided.

The composition of the proposed study population must be described in
terms of gender and racial/ethnic group.  In addition, gender and
racial/ethnic issues should be addressed in developing a research
design and sample size appropriate for the scientific objectives of the
study.  This information should be included in the form PHS 398 in
Sections 1-4 of the Research Plan AND summarized in Section 5, Human
Subjects.

Applicants are urged to assess carefully the feasibility of including
the broadest possible representation of minority groups.  However, NIH
recognizes that it may not be feasible or appropriate in all research
projects to include representation of the full array of United States
racial/ethnic minority populations (i.e., Native Americans (including
American Indians or Alaskan Natives), Asian/Pacific Islanders, Blacks,
Hispanics).

The rationale for studies on single minority population groups should
be provided.

For the purpose of this policy, clinical research includes human
biomedical and behavioral studies of etiology, epidemiology, prevention
(and preventive strategies), diagnosis, or treatment of diseases,
disorders or conditions, including but not limited to clinical trials.

The usual NIH policies concerning research on human subjects also
apply.  Basic research or clinical studies in which human tissues
cannot be identified or linked to individuals are excluded.  However,
every effort should be made to include human tissues from women and
racial/ethnic minorities when it is important to apply the results of
the study broadly, and this should be addressed by applicants.

For foreign awards, the policy on inclusion of women applies fully;
since the definition of minority differs in other countries, the
applicant must discuss the relevance of research involving foreign
population groups to the United States' populations, including
minorities.

If the required information is not contained within the application,
the application will be returned.

Peer reviewers will address specifically whether the research plan in
the application conforms to these policies.  If the representation of
women or minorities in a study design is inadequate to answer the
scientific question(s) addressed AND the justification for the selected
study population is inadequate, it will be considered a scientific
weakness or deficiency in the study design and will be reflected in
assigning the priority score to the application.

All applications for clinical research submitted to NIH are required to
address these policies.  NIH funding components will not award grants
or cooperative agreements that do not comply with these policies.

APPLICATION PROCEDURES

Applications are to be submitted on the grant application form PHS 398
(rev. 9/91) and will be accepted at the standard application deadlines
as indicated in the application kit.  The receipt dates for
applications for AIDS-related research are found in the PHS 398
instructions.

Application kits are available at most institutional offices of
sponsored research and may be obtained from the Office of Grant
Inquiries, Division of Research Grants, National Institutes of Health,
Westwood Building, Room 449, Bethesda, MD 20892, telephone (301)
496-7441.  The title and number of the announcement must be typed in
Section 2a on the face page of the application.

FIRST award applications must include at least three sealed letters of
reference attached to the face page of the original application.  FIRST
award applications submitted without the required number of reference
letters will be considered incomplete and will be returned without
review.

The completed original application and five legible copies must be sent
or delivered to:

Division of Research Grants
National Institutes of Health
Westwood Building, Room 240
Bethesda, MD  20892**

REVIEW PROCEDURES

Applications will be assigned on the basis of established PHS referral
guidelines.  Applications will be reviewed for scientific and technical
merit by an initial review group in accordance with the standard NIH
peer review procedures.  Following scientific-technical review, the
applications will receive a second-level review by the appropriate
national advisory council.  Small grant applications (R03) do not
receive a second-level review.

AWARD CRITERIA

Applications will compete for available funds with all other approved
applications assigned to that Institute/Center/Division.  The following
will be considered in making funding decisions:

o  Scientific and technical merit of the proposed project as determined
by peer review
o  Availability of funds
o  Institute program needs and balance

INQUIRIES

Written and telephone inquiries are encouraged.  The opportunity to
clarify any issues or questions from potential applications is welcome.

Direct inquiries regarding programmatic issues to:

Dr. Lisa Onken
Treatment Research Branch
National Institute on Drug Abuse
5600 Fishers Lane, Room 10A-30
Rockville, MD  20857
Telephone:  (301) 443-4060

Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to:

Mrs. Shirley Denney, Chief
Grants Management Branch
National Institute on Drug Abuse
5600 Fishers Lane, Room 8A-54
Rockville, MD  20857
Telephone:  (301) 443-6710

AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS

This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
No. 93.279.  Awards are made under authorization of the Public Health
Service Act, Section 301 and administered under PHS grants policies and
Federal Regulations at Title 42 CFR Part 52, Grants for Research
Projects, Title 45 CFR part 74 and 92, Administration of Grants, and 45
CFR Part 46, Protection of Human Subjects.  Title 42 CFR Part 2,
Confidentiality of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Patient Records, may also be
applicable to these awards.  This program is not subject to the
intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or
Health Systems Agency review.

Sections of the Code of Federal Regulations are available in booklet
form from the U.S. Government Printing Office.

Awards must be administered in accordance with the PHS Grants Policy
Statement, (rev. 10/90), which is available from institutional offices
of sponsored research.

REFERENCES

Azrin, N., "Improvements in the community reinforcement approach to
alcoholism,"  Behavior Research and Therapy, 14: 339-348, 1976.

Borkovec, T.D., "Control groups and comparison groups in psychotherapy
outcome research,"  In Onken, L. Simon and Blaine, J.D. (Eds.)
Psychotherapy and counseling in the treatment of drug abuse, NIDA
Research Monograph #104, Department of Health and Human Services
Publication Number (ADM)90-1722, 1990.

Carroll, K., Rounsaville, B., and Gawin, F., "A comparative trial of
psychotherapies for ambulatory cocaine abusers:  Relapse Prevention and
Interpersonal Psychotherapy,"  American Journal of Drug and Alcohol
Abuse, 17:  229-247, 1991.

Childress, A.R., Ehrman, R., McLellan, A.T., and O'Brien, C.P., "Cue
reactivity assessment and a cue exposure intervention in cocaine
dependence,"  American Journal of Psychiatry, under review.

Crits-Christoph, P., Beebe, K., and Connolly, M.B. "Therapists effects
in the treatment of drug dependence:  Implications for conducting
comparative treatment studies,"  In Onken, L. Simon and Blaine, J.D.
(Eds.)  Psychotherapy and counseling in the treatment of drug abuse,
NIDA Research Monograph #104, Department of Health and Human Services
Publication Number (ADM)90-1722, 1990.

Grabowski, J., Stitzer, M.L., and Henningfeld, J.E., "Therapeutic
applications of behavioral techniques:  An overview,".  In Behavioral
Intervention Techniques in Drug Abuse Treatment, Grabowski, J.,
Stitzer, M.L., and Henningfeld, J.E.(Eds.) NIDA Research Monograph #46,
Department of Health and Human Services Publication Number
(ADM)86-1282, 1984.

Higgins, S.T., Stitzer, M.L., Bigelow, G.E. and Liebson, I.A.,
"Contingent methadone delivery:  Effects on illicit opiate use,"  Drug
and Alcohol Dependence; 17: 311-322, 1986.

Higgins, S.T., Delaney, D.D., Budney, A.J., Bickel, W.K., Hughes, J.R.,
Foerg, F., and Fenwick. J.W., "A behavioral approach to achieving
initial cocaine abstinence,"  American Journal of Psychiatry, 148,9:
1218-1224, 1991.

Howard, K.I., Cox, M., and Saunders, S.M., "Attrition in substance
abuse comparative treatment research:  The illusion of randomization,"
In Onken, L. Simon and Blaine, J.D. (Eds.)  Psychotherapy and
counseling in the treatment of drug abuse, NIDA Research Monograph
#104, Department of Health and Human Services Publication Number
(ADM)90-1722, 1990.

Hunt, G.M., and Azrin, N., A community reinforcement approach to
alcoholism.  Behavior Research and Therapy, 11: 91-104, 1973.

Iguchi, M.Y., Stitzer, M.L., Bigelow, G.E., and Liebson, I.A.,
"Contingency management in methadone maintenance:  Effects of
reinforcing and aversive consequences on illicit polydrug use,"  Drug
and Alcohol Dependence; 22: 1-7, 1988.

Kadden, R.M., Cooney, N.L., Getter, H., and Litt, M.D., "Matching
alcoholics to coping skills or interactional therapies: Posttreatment
results,"  Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57: 698-704,
1989.

Lambert, M.J., Shapiro, D.A., and Bergin, A.E., "The effectiveness of
psychotherapy,"  In Garfield, S.L. and Bergin, A.E. (Eds.)  Handbook of
Psychotherapy and Behavior Change. New York: Wiley, 157-211, 1986.

Lambert, M.J., "Conceptualizing and selecting measures of treatment
outcome:  Implications for drug abuse outcome studies,"  In Onken, L.
Simon and Blaine, J.D. (Eds.) Psychotherapy and counseling in the
treatment of drug abuse, NIDA Research Monograph #104, Department of
Health and Human Services Publication Number (ADM)90-1722, 1990.

Luborsky, L., Singer, B., and Luborsky, L., "Comparative studies of
psychotherapies:  Is it true that "everyone has won and all must have
prizes?"  Archives of General Psychiatry 32: 995-1007, 1975.

McLellan, A.T., Woody, G.E., Luborsky, L, and Goehl, L., "Is the
counselor an 'active ingredient' in substance abuse rehabilitation?  An
examination of treatment success among four counselors,"  The Journal
of Nervous and Mental Disease, 176: 423-430, 1988.

Onken, L. Simon and Blaine, J.D. (Eds.)  Psychotherapy and counseling
in the treatment of drug abuse, NIDA Research Monograph #104,
Department of Health and Human Services Publication Number
(ADM)90-1722, 1990.

Rounsaville, B.J., Glazer, W., Wilbur, C.H., Weissman, M.M., and
Kleber, H.D., "Short-term interpersonal psychotherapy in methadone
maintained opiate addicts,"  Archives of General Psychiatry 40:
629-636, 1983.

Smith, M.L. and Glass, G.V., "Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome
studies,"  American Psychologist 32: 752-760, 1977.

Stanton, M.D., and Todd, T.C. and Associates, The Family Therapy of
Drug Abuse and Addiction.  New York:  The Guilford Press, 1982.

Stiles, W.B., Shapiro, D.A., and Elliott, R., "Are all psychotherapies
equivalent?"  American Psychologist 41: 165-180, 1986.

Stitzer, M.L., Bickel, W.K., Bigelow, G.E., and Liebson, I.A., "Effect
of methadone dose contingencies on urinalysis results of
polydrug-abusing methadone-maintenance patients," Drug and Alcohol
Dependence; 18: 341-348, 1986.

Stitzer, M.L., Iguchi, M.Y., and Felch, L.J., "Contingent take-home
incentive:  Effects on drug use of methadone maintenance patients,"
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, In press.

Woody, G.E., Luborsky, L., McLellan, A.T., O'Brien, C.P., Beck, A.T.,
Blaine, J., Herman, I., and Hole, A., "Psychotherapy for opiate
addicts- Does it help?"  Archives of General Psychiatry 40: 639-645,
1983.

Woody, G.E., McLellan, A.T., Luborsky, L., and O'Brien, C.P., Blaine,
J., Fox, S., Herman, I., and Beck, A.T., "Severity of psychiatric
symptoms as a predictor of benefits from psychotherapy:  The Veterans
Administration-Penn Study," American Journal Of Psychiatry 141:
1172-1177, 1984.

Woody, G.E., McLellan, A.T., Luborsky, L., and O'Brien, C.P.,
"Sociopathy and psychotherapy outcome,"  Archives of General Psychiatry
42: 1081-1086, 1985.

Woody, G.E., McLellan, A.T., Luborsky, L., and O'Brien, C.P.,
"Psychotherapy and counseling for methadone-maintained opiate addicts:
Results of research studies,"  In Psychotherapy and Counseling in Drug
Abuse Treatment, Onken, L. Simon and Blaine, J.D., NIDA Research
Monograph #104, Department of Health and Human Services Publication
Number (ADM)90-1722, 1990.

$$P1 END ************************************************************

$$P2 BEGIN PA-93-28 *************************************************

RESEARCH TO IMPROVE DRUG ABUSE TREATMENT ENTRY, RETENTION, COMPLIANCE,
AND EFFECTIVENESS

NIH GUIDE, Volume 21, Number 44, December 11, 1992

PA NUMBER:  PA-93-28

P.T. 34; K.W. 0404009, 0415001, 0404000

National Institute on Drug Abuse

PURPOSE

The purpose of this announcement is to encourage research to
investigate entry, retention, and compliance in drug abuse treatment,
and research on strategies to improve entry and retention in treatment,
and to bring about compliance with program expectations and
effectiveness of drug abuse treatment.  An important focus of these
studies will be on the various environmental and intrapersonal factors
that promote drug abuse treatment entry, retention, compliance, and
effectiveness.  Research may be conducted in conjunction with clinical
trials, evaluation studies, or through separate epidemiological and
ethnographic studies.

HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000

The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health
promotion and disease prevention objectives of Healthy People 2000, a
PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas.  This Program
Announcement (PA), Research to Improve Drug Abuse Treatment Entry,
Retention, Compliance, and Effectiveness, is primarily related to the
priority area of alcohol and other drugs.  Potential applicants may
obtain a copy of Healthy People 2000 (Full Report:  Stock No.
017-001-00474-0, or Summary Report:  Stock No. 017-001-00473-1) through
the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office,
Washington, DC 20402-9325 (telephone 202-783-3238).

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

Applications may be submitted by foreign and domestic, non-profit and
for-profit organizations