From owner-sci-resources@net.bio.net Fri Nov 04 22:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: BIOSCI Administrator <biosci-help@net.bio.net>
Newsgroups: bionet.sci-resources
Subject: NIH GUIDE - RFA CA-95-003 - V23(39) 11/04/94
Date: 5 Nov 1994 12:35:11 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 915
Sender: biohelp@net.bio.net
Approved: biosci-moderator@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <39gq9v$l9@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

$$XID RFA CA95003 CA-95-003 P1O1 ***************************************

COOPERATIVE FAMILY REGISTRY FOR EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES OF BREAST
CANCER

NIH GUIDE, Volume 23, Number 39, November 4, 1994

RFA:  CA-95-003

P.T. 34; K.W. 0715036, 0785055, 0780030

National Cancer Institute

Letter of Intent Receipt Date:  November 30,1995
Application Receipt Date:  February 17, 1995

PURPOSE

The Extramural Programs Branch, Epidemiology and Biostatistics
Program, Division of Cancer Etiology, National Cancer Institute (NCI)
invites cooperative agreement applications from investigators to
participate, with the assistance of the NCI, in a network of
organizations constituting a Cooperative Family Registry for Breast
Cancer (CFRBC).

The purpose of the proposed awards is to stimulate a cooperative
effort to:

1.  Collect pedigree information, epidemiological data and related
biological specimens from patients with a family history of breast
cancer in order to provide a registry resource for interdisciplinary
studies on the etiology of breast cancer, and to encourage
translational research in this area.

2.  Identify a population at high risk for breast cancer that could
benefit from new preventive and therapeutic strategies.

This Request for Applications (RFA) responds to Congressional
language instructing the Director of the National Cancer Institute to
conduct and support research to expand the understanding of the cause
of, and find a cure for, breast cancer.

HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000

The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health
promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000,"
a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas.  This RFA,
Cooperative Family Registry for Epidemiologic Studies of Breast
Cancer Studies, relates to the priority area of cancer.  Potential
applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2000" (Full Report:
Stock No. 017-001-00474-0 or Summary Report:  Stock No.
017-001-00473-1) through the Superintendent of Documents, Government
Printing Office, Washington DC 20402-9325 (telephone 202-783-3238).

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

Applications may be submitted by domestic and foreign non-profit and
for-profit institutions, public and private, such as colleges,
universities, hospitals, research laboratories, units of State and
local governments, and eligible agencies of the Federal government.
Applications from minority and women investigators are encouraged.

MECHANISM OF SUPPORT

Support of this program will be through the cooperative agreement
(U01), an assistance mechanism in which substantial NCI scientific
and programmatic involvement with the recipients during performance
of the planned activity is anticipated.  Under the cooperative
agreement, the NIH purpose is to support and/or stimulate the
recipient's activity by involvement in and otherwise working jointly
with the awardee in a partner role, but is not to assume direction,
prime responsibility, or a dominant role in the activity.  Details of
the responsibilities, relationship, and governance of the study to be
funded under cooperative agreements are discussed later in this
document under the section "Terms and Conditions of Award."

The total project period for applications submitted in response to
the present RFA may not exceed four years.  The anticipated award
date is December 1995.

Because the nature and scope of the research proposed in response to
this RFA may vary, it is anticipated that the size of an award will
vary also.  Awards and level of support depend on the receipt of a
sufficient number of applications of high scientific merit.  Although
this program is provided for in the financial plans of the NCI,
awards pursuant to this RFA are contingent upon the availability of
funds for this purpose.

This RFA is a one-time solicitation.  At this time, the NCI has not
determined whether or how this solicitation will be continued beyond
the present RFA.

FUNDS AVAILABLE

Approximately $2 million in total costs per year for four years will
be committed to specifically fund applications that are submitted in
response to this RFA.  It is anticipated that two to five awards will
be made.  This funding level is dependent on the receipt of a
sufficient number of applications of high scientific merit.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

Background

According to 1993 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)
Registry data, breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer
death among women in the United States, second only to lung cancer,
and its incidence is increasing at a rate of approximately two
percent per year.  Breast cancer is a highly complex disease, and the
natural history of primary breast cancer varies considerably from
patient to patient.  The genetic heterogeneity and etiologic
complexity of breast cancer limit identification of high-risk
populations.  Family studies of breast cancer indicate that the
genetic contribution to breast cancer risk is an important component
of the heterogeneity of this disorder.  The compelling need for
validated screening procedures (especially among young women) and for
the identification of risk factors and predictors contributing to the
rising incidence of this disease have prompted Congress and the
scientific community to place high priority on research in breast
cancer etiology and on the development of preventive and therapeutic
strategies.

Recommendations from a conference on "Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer:
an Interdisciplinary Approach," sponsored by NCI in 1992, indicate
that extended families with high incidence of cancer or cancer
syndromes provide a unique research resource for epidemiologic,
molecular genetics, and prevention studies.  Epidemiologic and
interdisciplinary studies of major cancer genes are based on the
ascertainment of families with high incidence of cancer.  Large,
informative families are useful for identifying and characterizing
susceptibility genes involved in the etiology of cancer, and
elucidating gene-environment interactions.  Moreover, members of
cancer-prone families represent a population at high risk that could
benefit from novel preventive and therapeutic efforts.  Early
ascertainment of cancer-affected families is needed particularly for
tumors with high mortality rates, such as early-onset breast cancer
and breast/ovarian cancer.  In addition, the selection of rare
families with multiple cases of male breast cancer, or affected by
familial cancer syndromes that include breast cancer could offer a
substantial contribution to the study of this disease.  The meeting
report specifically recommends a concerted effort to identify such
families and avoid their loss to follow-up.

The meeting participants indicated that it is impractical, expensive
and scientifically unproductive to collect only a few families at a
time and that it is timely to develop larger registries of families
at high risk for cancer.  Such registries should include the
collection of epidemiologic and clinical data and of blood and
biological specimens, which would be used in future epidemiologic and
biologic studies.  This research has the potential to be translated
into clinical applications and public health measures to address the
pressing needs of at-risk populations.

Many different approaches to breast cancer research will be able to
take advantage of family registry resources, as new knowledge and
molecular tools become available.  The existence of an established
cooperative breast cancer family registry would enhance the cost-
effectiveness of:  (1) the identification and follow-up of high-risk
individuals for the purpose of preventive intervention; (2) the
evaluation of the effectiveness of optional treatment strategies as
they become available; (3) molecular epidemiology studies generating
and testing etiologic hypotheses; and (4) the integration of
laboratory studies into the biological mechanisms underlying breast
cancer with epidemiologic and genetic data.

Current epidemiologic studies of familial breast cancer are limited
by the feasibility and expense of collecting a sufficient number of
high-risk families to define the genetic heterogeneity of the
familial disorder.  Moreover, as new statistical approaches become
available to explore the interaction between genetic and
environmental factors in the etiology of familial breast cancer, the
collection of appropriate epidemiologic data on exposure to potential
risk factors in these same families becomes extremely important.
Other limitations are the lack of archival or fresh-frozen tissue
specimens and blood samples, and the difficulty in collecting and
validating clinical and epidemiologic data.

Efforts made to identify breast cancer-prone families have focused on
the localization and mapping of a putative gene for early onset-
breast cancer and breast/ovarian cancer, or BRCA1, using molecular
markers for a defined area on chromosome 17q.  Although an uncertain
fraction of familial breast cancer is attributable to BRCA1, the risk
for breast cancer of women inheriting this gene is extremely high (up
to 85 percent lifetime risk), while the risk for ovarian cancer is
also elevated.  Testing for the BRCA1 gene is currently limited to
very rare families being analyzed for research purposes.  However,
since the BRCA1 gene has been recently identified, and the mapping
and cloning of other possible breast cancer genes are being pursued,
it will be extremely important to identify and appropriately counsel
the individuals at high risk and their families on preventive and
therapeutic options.  A family registry for breast cancer would
greatly facilitate this process.

Research Goals and Scope

The purpose of this RFA is to stimulate cooperative efforts for the
establishment of a comprehensive family registry for epidemiologic
and interdisciplinary studies of individuals at high risk for breast
cancer.  The establishment of a population-based selection process
that could utilize already existing resources, such as SEER or other
cancer registries, is strongly encouraged.

The CFRBC will enable participant organizations to: identify
individuals with a family history of breast cancer, breast-ovarian
cancer syndrome, male breast cancer, and various familial syndromes
that include breast cancer; collect and define the related pedigrees;
and collect clinical (tumor type, stage at diagnosis, hormonal
evaluation, etc.), epidemiologic (age at diagnosis, sociodemographic
status, etc.), and other relevant data (such as dietary history) to
correlate with the pedigree information.  Support for the collection
of related biological specimens, such as blood samples, paraffin
blocks and fresh-frozen tissue, will be included.  This registry is
not intended to directly support research on the mapping and cloning
of the gene(s) for breast or breast/ovarian cancer, but to assist
investigators funded through other sources by providing the data and
biological specimens that can be used for a variety of purposes,
including etiologic studies and prevention and treatment-oriented
translational research.

The applicants should demonstrate the capability for developing
common protocols including, but not limited to:

o  ascertainment of breast cancer families;
o  epidemiologic and clinical data collection, validation and
management (statistical support);
o  collection and banking of biological specimens (blood and
tissues); o  limited follow-up for outcome, recurrence and mortality;
and o  counseling of family members on risk and possible preventive
or therapeutic interventions.

Each application must have an Operation Core for statistical and
logistic support, capable of providing the necessary coordination for
specimen and data collection, and functioning as a central facility
at the applicant's institution for data and specimens management and
storage.  Applicants must address coordination of quality control
among awardees with regard to collection and storage of data and
specimens.

The establishment of the CFRBC resource will promote the availability
of epidemiological and clinical data and the related specimens
necessary for multidisciplinary and translational studies on the
etiology of breast cancer.  The awardees will provide to the research
community at large pedigree information, epidemiological data, and
biological specimens for high priority research studies.  It is
anticipated that prioritization of the research study proposals
requesting access to the CFRBC's resources will be made by an
Advisory Committee (AC), and will be based on scientific validity
criteria established by the Steering Committee (SC) (for composition
and duties of AC and SC see below under special requirement).  The
NCI will help to coordinate and promote this process through the
Program Coordinator's membership in the AC and SC.

Of the funds provided by this RFA, at least 90 percent of the total
cost proposed in each application must be directed to the basic CFRBC
activities (accrual of families, data and specimen collection,
management, and retrieval). Up to 10 percent of the total cost, or
$50,000 per year (whichever is smaller, starting from the second year
of the cooperative agreement), can be requested for pilot or
feasibility studies utilizing the family registry resources.

Pilot/feasibility studies should be designed to obtain sufficient
data to form the foundation for future R01 research grant
applications, to help identify new areas where additional
investigations are warranted, and to promote interdisciplinary and
translational breast cancer research.

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

Definitions

AWARDEE  The organization to which a cooperative agreement is awarded
and that is responsible and accountable to NCI for the use of funds
provided and for performance of the project supported by the
cooperative agreement.

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR (PI)  The single individual at the Awardee's
Institution designated by the Awardee in the cooperative agreement
application, who is responsible for the scientific and technical
direction of the project.

OPERATION CORE (OP)  The central site at the Applicant/Awardee
Institution that handles the epidemiological and pedigrees data and
the biological specimens.  All the data and specimens from each
Applicant/Awardee Institution will be coordinated and located at one
central location within the awardee's own Institution.  The PI serves
as the head of the Coordination Site.

NCI PROGRAM COORDINATOR  The Extramural Programs Branch (EPB) Program
Director who will be interacting scientifically and administratively
with the Applicant/Awardee Institutions and providing guidance for
the overall program for NCI.

STEERING COMMITTEE (SC) A committee whose membership includes the NCI
Coordinator, the PI and one other investigator from each awarded
cooperative agreement, and one research scientist with expertise in
translational breast cancer research who is not affiliated with any
of the Awardee Institutions.  This research scientist on the SC will
be appointed by mutual agreement of the NCI Program Coordinator and
the PIs.  The SC will serve as the governing board of the CFRBC (for
its functions, see under "Terms and Conditions of Award).

ADVISORY COMMITTEE (AC) A committee composed of six to eight senior
scientists with experience in multidisciplinary and translational
breast cancer research.  The members of the panel will evaluate all
research proposals (those of the awardees as well as proposals from
the research community at-large) proposing to utilize the CFRBC's
resources according to the evaluation and the review criteria
provided by the SC.  The AC will provide a recommendation to the SC
regarding the priority of the proposed research.  The membership of
the AC may vary, depending on the specific areas of the proposed
breast cancer research to be reviewed.  All AC members will be
selected by the SC (see under "Terms and Conditions of Award" for
function of the AC).  The NCI Program Coordinator will function as a
non-voting liaison member between the AC and the SC, and attend the
AC meetings.

Study Organization and Function

The overall structure of the CFRBC will consist of two to five funded
Institutions (awardees) that are governed and coordinated through the
SC.  Each awardee unit will be composed of one funded site, an
Operation Core at the funded site, and a PI providing the scientific
and administrative leadership for the unit and serving as the Head of
the Operation Core.

The overall function of the CFRBC is to promote multidisciplinary and
translational research in the framework of studies in the genetic
epidemiology of breast cancer, by serving as a national resource to
the research community at large.  Requests for specimen and data from
the awardees and their collaborators will be reviewed, prioritized by
the AC, and approved by the SC along with all other requests from
investigators in the research community at-large.

The Terms and Conditions of Award, below, will be included in all
awards issued as a result of this RFA.  It is critical that each
applicant include specific plans for responding to these terms.

Terms and Conditions of Award

These special Terms of Award are in addition to and not in lieu of
otherwise applicable OMB administrative guidelines, HHS Grant
Administration regulations at 45 CFR part 74 and 92, and other HHS,
PHS, and NIH Grant Administration policy statements.

The administrative and funding instrument used for this program is a
cooperative agreement (U01), an assistance mechanism (rather than an
acquisition mechanism) in which substantial NIH scientific and/or
programmatic involvement with the awardee is anticipated during
performance of the activity.  Under the cooperative agreement, the
NIH purpose is to support and/or stimulate the recipient's activity
by involvement in and otherwise working jointly with the award
recipient in a partner role, but is not to assume direction, prime
responsibility, or a dominant role in the activity.  Consistent with
this concept the dominant role and prime responsibility for the
activity resides with the awardee(s) for the project as a whole,
although specific tasks and activities in carrying out the studies
will be shared among the awardees and the NCI Program Coordinator.

1.  Awardee Rights and Responsibilities

Awardees will have primary rights and responsibilities to define
projects and approaches and to plan and conduct the project,
including:

o  The Awardee's PI will participate as a permanent member in the SC
and designate a second investigator from his/her institution to be a
permanent member of such committee.

o  The Awardee will work together with the other Awardees through the
SC to establish the registry operating policies, uniform collection
procedures, and quality control procedures for specimens and data.
The Awardee will be required to accept and implement the common
policies and procedures approved by the SC.

o  The Awardee must agree to provide access to both specimens and
data to investigators both within and outside the awardee's
institutions, based on the prioritization of the research proposals
set by the AC and final approval by the SC.  The Awardee will abide
by the decisions of the SC based on recommendations from the AC.

o  The Awardee will retain custody of, and have primary rights to,
the data developed under this awards, subject to the Government
rights of access consistent with current HHS, PHS, and NIH policies.

o  Each awardee will need to implement and comply with the common
study protocols as established by the SC, but additional elements
could be appended by individual institutions to address issues of
unique interest or capabilities in each center.

o  The Awardee must provide an annual progress report to the EPB,
DCE, NCI, and a copy to the chairperson of the SC, in a format that
is compatible with the annual progress report of the other awardees.
Information on the operation of the registry as well as performance
and progress on pilot studies are to be included.

o  Collaboration among awardees in the reporting of findings
originated from this initiative is encouraged.  Collaborative
publications among awardees and NCI are anticipated.

Immediately after the notification of award, the successful applicant
should also provide the name of one scientist not affiliated with
his/her Institution as a potential member of the SC.  In addition,
each applicant should provide the names and qualifications of two
scientists not affiliated with his/her Institution as potential
members of the AC.  Letters of commitment from the potential members
of the AC and SC should be attached.

2.  National Cancer Institute Staff Responsibilities

The NCI Program Coordinator will be designated by the Chief,
Extramural Programs Branch, EBP, DCE, NCI.  He/she will have
substantial scientific-programmatic involvement during conduct of
this activity through participation in the SC and AC activities.  The
Program Coordinator will provide technical assistance, advice and
coordination, assure that the SC and the AC follow the NIH guidelines
on conflict of interest issues, and play a critical role in promoting
the availability and use of the registry. The role of the Program
Coordinator is to assist and facilitate, but not to direct, the
activities supported by the CFRBC.

The NCI Program Coordinator will:

o  Lend his/her expertise and overall knowledge of the NCI- and NIH-
sponsored breast cancer research to facilitate the selection of
scientists non-affiliated with the awardees institutions who are to
serve in the AC and SC.

o  Serve as liaison, helping to coordinate activities among the
awardees; act as a liaison to the NCI, and as an information resource
about extramural multidisciplinary cancer research activities in the
area of genetics and molecular epidemiology.

o  Attend the SC meetings as a voting member, assist in developing
operating guidelines, quality control procedures, and consistent
policies for dealing with recurrent situations that require
coordinated action.

o  Serve as liaison between the SC and the AC, attending AC meetings
in a non-voting liaison member role, lending a degree of continuity
between AC and SC, as the ad hoc AC composition may change depending
on the expertise required to review the submitted research
applications.

o  Serve on subcommittee of the SC and the AC as required.

o  Assist in the monitoring of field data collection, helping to
ensure standardization in methods across study centers; and assist in
the interpretation and reporting of the collected information.  This
will be necessary because of the complexity of this multi-site
structure, requiring a high degree of coordination and program
involvement to achieve adequate standardization of procedures.

o  Assist by providing advice in the management and technical
performance of the investigation. The Program Coordinator will serve
as scientific liaison between the awardees and other program staff at
NCI who have previous experience in the establishment of cancer
registries and tumor bank.

o  Assist in promoting the availability of the CFRBC resources to the
scientific community at large, for use in translational and
prevention-oriented breast cancer research, as stated in this RFA
goals.

The National Cancer Institute reserves the right to reduce the
budget, to withhold support, and to suspend, terminate or curtail a
study or an award in the event of substantial shortfall in specimen
accrual, data reporting, inadequate quality control in specimens or
clinical data collection, other major breach of the protocol, or
substantial failure to comply with the terms of the award.

3.  Collaborative Responsibilities

a.  Steering Committee

The SC will serve as the main governing board of the CFRBC (see
"Terms and Conditions of Award").  The SC membership includes the NCI
Coordinator, the PI, one other investigator from each awarded
cooperative agreement, and one research scientist with expertise in
the field of multidisciplinary and translational breast cancer
research that is not affiliated with any of the awardees
institutions.  This last member will be appointed by mutual agreement
of the NCI Coordinator and the PI's.  Additional members can be added
by action of the SC.  Other appropriate NCI staff may need to attend
the SC meetings if their expertise is required, to participate in
specific discussions.

The SC will be responsible for reviewing the plans for development of
the CFRBC proposed in the individual applications of the awardees.
This Committee will develop uniform procedures for data collection
and management, tissue collection, processing and distribution, and
quality control.  The SC will develop the criteria for review and
prioritization of research proposals requiring the use of the CFRBC's
resources.  The NCI Program Coordinator will assist the other members
of the SC in all these tasks.  Furthermore, the NCI Program
Coordinator will serve as the scientific liaison between the awardees
and the other program staff of NCI who have previous experience in
the establishment of family cancer registries.  Awardees will be
required to accept and implement the common guidelines and procedures
approved by the SC.

The first meeting of the SC will be called by the NCI Program
Coordinator shortly after award of the cooperative agreements.  At
this initial meeting, the Committee will elect a Chairperson (someone
other than the Program Coordinator).  The Chair of the SC is
responsible for coordinating the Committee's activities, for
preparing meeting agendas, and for scheduling and chairing meetings.
The Program Coordinator attends and participates in all meetings of
the SC, and should be informed of any major interactions.  Subsequent
meetings will be planned and scheduled at this meeting.  Two
additional meetings will be held during the first year of operation,
and there will be two meetings a year thereafter, one of which with
the AC.  The meetings will be held in Bethesda or at another
convenient location.  Accordingly, respondents must request
sufficient funds within the submitted budgets to accommodate travel
expenses for the PI and his designee.  Subcommittees will be
established by the SC as it deems appropriate.

The SC is responsible for providing documentation as to the
availability and accessibility of specimens and data for the use of
investigators with approved research proposals requesting the use of
the registry resources.  In no circumstance will the SC overturn the
recommendation of the AC, except when specimens and/or data are not
available.

The SC will select members for the AC.  The SC in the conduct of all
business matters will pay particular attention to conflict of
interest issues, especially in actions regarding recommended
prioritization of the AC.

b.  Advisory Committee

The AC is responsible for reviewing, evaluating and approving
research proposals submitted by investigators from the research
community at large, as well as from the awardees, for the use of the
registry resources.  A recommendation in terms of priority of the
proposed research should be provided to the SC.  The only occurrence
in which the SC can overturn the recommendation of the AC is the
unavailability of the requested specimens and/or clinical data.  The
AC will meet with the SC at least once yearly, at one of the two
scheduled SC meetings.

The AC will be composed of six to eight senior scientists with
expertise in multidisciplinary and translational research in the
field of breast cancer, which may include epidemiologists, laboratory
researchers, clinicians, or other expertise that the SC deems needed.
The membership of the AC may vary, depending on the scientific areas
of the proposed research to be reviewed and evaluated.  All members
will be selected by the SC.  The Program Coordinator will function as
a non-voting liaison member between the AC and the SC, and attend the
AC meetings.

The members of the AC will evaluate all research proposals (those of
the awardees as well as from the research community at large)
proposing to utilize the CFRBC resources, according to the evaluation
and review criteria provided by the SC.  The review of proposals can
be conducted either in person, by conference call or by mail at least
twice a year.  All reviews will be conducted according to rules
pertaining to the conduct of reviews for NIH grants, contracts, and
cooperative agreements, paying special attention to issues of
conflict of interest, whether real or apparent.  The AC will provide
a recommendation to the SC as of the priority of the proposed
research.  The Chair of the AC will forward the final recommendation
to the SC.

4.  Arbitration Procedures

Any disagreement that may arise on scientific/programmatic matters
(within the scope of the award) between the award recipients and the
NCI may be brought to arbitration.  An arbitration panel will be
composed of three members, one selected by the SC (without the vote
of the Program Coordinator) or by the individual awardee in the event
of an individual disagreement, a second member selected by the NCI,
and the third member selected by the two prior selected members.
This special arbitration procedure in no way affects the awardee's
right to appeal an adverse action that is otherwise appealable in
accordance with the PHS regulation at 42 CFR part 50, subpart D and
HHS regulation at 45 CFR part 16.

INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN
SUBJECTS

It is the policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups
and their subpopulation must be included in all NIH-supported
biomedical and behavioral research projects involving human subjects,
unless a clear and compelling rationale and justification is provided
that inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health of the
subjects and the purpose of the research.  This new policy results
from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 (section 492B of Public Law
103-43) and supersedes and strengthens the previous policies
(Concerning the Inclusion of Women in Study Populations, and
Concerning the Inclusion of Minorities in Study Populations) which
have been in effect since 1990.  The new policy contains some new
provisions that are substantially different from the 1990 policies.

All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should
read the "NIH Guidelines on the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as
Subjects in Clinical Research," which was printed in the Federal
Register of March 28, 1994  (59 FR 14508-14513) and reprinted in the
NIH GUIDE FOR GRANTS AND CONTRACTS of March 18, 1994, Volume 23,
Number 11.

Investigators may obtain copies from these sources or from the
program staff or contact person listed below.  Program staff may also
provide additional relevant information concerning the policy.

LETTER OF INTENT

Prospective applicants are requested to submit, by November 30, 1994,
a letter of intent that includes a descriptive title of the proposed
research, the name and address of the Principal Investigator, the
names of other key personnel, the participating institution(s), and
the number and title of the RFA in response to which the application
may be submitted.

Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does
not enter into the review of subsequent applications, the information
that it contains is helpful in planning for the review of
applications.  It allows NCI staff to estimate the potential review
workload and avoid conflict of interest in the review.  The letter of
intent is to be sent to Daniela Seminara, Ph.D., M.P.H., at the
address listed under INQUIRIES.

APPLICATION PROCEDURES

Applications are to be submitted on form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91),
available at most institutional offices of sponsored research and
from the Office of Grants Information, Division of Research Grants,
National Institutes of Health, Westwood Building, Room 449, Bethesda,
MD 20892, telephone 301/594-7248, and from the NIH program
administrator listed under INQUIRIES.  The format and instructions
applicable to research grant applications must be followed.

It is critical that applicants clearly describe plans to accommodate
stated criteria and staff involvement as listed in the Terms and
Conditions of Award, and in the Review Criteria Section.

Applicants must propose detailed plans for how to organize the CFRBC
in the most cost-effective and scientifically sound manner.
Applicants are encouraged to submit and describe their own ideas on
how to best meet the goals of this RFA.  Advantages and disadvantages
of the proposed approaches should be discussed, and the plans for
establishing collaborations should be described.

Plans should describe resources, including information on number of
probands available and reasonable estimate of the expected number and
quality of pedigree information and related epidemiological data and
biological specimen available.

The Operation Core should be adequately described, including the
facilities for data collection and storage and specimen storage, as
well as the investigators' experience in this area.  The applicants
must provide details on appropriate facilities and biohazard
precautions and comply with the applicable Federal, State, and Local
regulations, laws and finances in the operation of the Registry.

Information on the nature of the data collected at baseline and
follow-up should be provided.

Examples of data forms, epidemiologic questionnaire, medical records
and abstracting procedures, and software that may be appropriate for
the use of the registry should be included in the appendix

Methods should be proposed to retrieve and establish an inventory of
biological specimens, such as blood, fresh-frozen tissue, tissue
blocks and slides.

Appropriate data retrieval and data management procedures and quality
control methods for the epidemiological and clinical data should be
detailed.  The applicants must state a willingness to cooperate with
other awardees in developing policies for quality control and to
share data with other awardees.

The applicants must state a willingness and should discuss their
approach to cooperate with the SC and the AC in evaluating research
proposals utilizing the CFRBC resources, and to abide by the
decisions of the AC in prioritizing such proposals, after final
approval by the SC based on data and specimen availability.

The applicant should provide the name and qualifications for the
second investigator from his/her Institution to be designed as member
of the SC.

As the principal investigators of the funded applications and one
designee will be members of a SC that will meet three times in the
first year and twice in each subsequent year, travel funds for these
meetings should be set aside as a budget item.  As the AC will meet
with the SC once a year, funds should also be included to support
travel by one member of the AC to one SC meeting once a year, plus
any additional travel anticipated for AC members.

Applicants seeking up to 10 percent of the total cost, or up to
$50,000 per year for three years (whichever is smaller, starting from
the second year of the cooperative agreement), for pilot studies
utilizing the CFRBC resources, should document their ability to
conduct breast cancer research and document any of their ongoing work
in this area.  The research hypothesis, background and rationale and
design of the pilot study should be described as part of the research
plan, keeping within the allowed page limits.  The SC and the AC will
review the pilot studies proposed in the application in response to
this RFA even if the studies received approval under peer review.
Moneys for pilot studies will be restricted until the AC gives these
pilot studies high priority ratings, and the requested specimens
and/or data are available and have been released by the SC.  The
review of these pilot studies will occur along with the review and
prioritization of other requests submitted by investigators in the
research community at large.  The pilot studies will begin no sooner
than year two of the cooperative agreement.  However, if the AC does
not rank the pilot project as a high priority, a new pilot study that
is rated as high priority by the AC can be substituted.

The RFA label available in the application form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91)
must be affixed to the bottom of the face page.  Failure to use this
label could result in delayed processing of the application such that
it may not reach the review committee in time for review.  In
addition, the number and title of the RFA must be typed on line 2a of
the face page of the application and YES must be checked.

Submit a signed, typewritten original of the application, including
the Checklist, and three signed, exact, clear and single-sided
photocopies, in
one package to:

Division of Research Grants
National Institutes of Health
Westwood Building, Room 240
Bethesda, MD  20892**

At the time of submission, two additional copies of the application
must be sent to:

Ms. Toby Friedberg
Referral Officer
Division of Extramural Activities
National Cancer Institute
Executive Plaza North, Room 636
6130 Executive Boulevard
Rockville, MD  20852 (if hand delivered or delivery service)
Bethesda, MD 20892 (if using U.S. Postal Service)

It is important to send these copies at the same time that the
original and three copies are sent to DRG;  otherwise, the NCI cannot
guarantee that the application will be reviewed in competition with
other applications received by the designated receipt date.

Applications must be received by February 17, 1995.  If an
application is received after that date, it will be returned to the
applicant without review.  If the application submitted in response
to this RFA is substantially similar to a research grant application
already submitted to the NIH for review, but has not yet been
reviewed, the applicant will be asked to withdraw either the pending
application or the new one.  Simultaneous submission of identical
applications will not be allowed, nor will essentially identical
applications be reviewed by different review committees.  Therefore,
an application cannot be submitted in response to this RFA that is
essentially identical to one that has already been reviewed.  This
does not preclude the submission of substantial revisions of
applications already reviewed, but such applications must include an
introduction addressing the previous critique.

REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS

General Considerations

All applications will be judged on the basis of the scientific merit
of the proposed project and the documented ability of the
investigators to meet the RESEARCH OBJECTIVES of the RFA.  Although
the technical merit of the proposed protocol is important, it will
not be the sole criterion of evaluation of a study.  Other
considerations, such as the importance and timeliness of the proposed
study, access to patients, and multidisciplinary and translational
nature of the studies, will be part of the evaluation criteria.

Review Method

Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed for completeness by the
DRG and responsiveness by the NCI.  Incomplete applications will be
returned to the applicant without further consideration.  Also, if
NCI staff find that the application is not responsive to the RFA, it
will be returned without further consideration.

Applications that are complete and responsive to the RFA will be
evaluated for scientific and technical merit by an appropriate peer
review group convened by the NCI in accordance with the review
criteria stated below.  As part of the initial merit review, a
process (triage) may be used by the initial review group in which
applications will be determined to be competitive or non-competitive
based on their scientific merit relative to other applications
received in response to the RFA.  Applications judged to be
competitive will be discussed and assigned a priority score.
Applications determined to be non-competitive will be withdrawn from
further consideration and the principal investigator/program director
and the official signing for the applicant organization will be
promptly notified.

Review Criteria

Applicants are encouraged to submit and describe their own ideas
about how to best meet the goals of the cooperative study and their
specific protocols, and are expected to address issues identified
under SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS of the RFA.

The review group will assess the scientific merit of the protocols
and related factors, including:

o  extent to which the application addresses the goals and objectives
of the RFA

o  adequacy of the applicant's plans for addressing the special
scientific and technical program requirements presented in the RFA;

o  merit of the proposed activities and organizational plans for
implementing the CFRBC;

o  qualifications and research experience of the Principal
Investigator and staff, particularly, but not exclusively, in the
area of the proposed research;

o  time availability of the PI and staff

o  availability of, and access to, a suitable patient population;

o  adequacy of existing physical facilities and resources of the
applicants' Institutions.

o  demonstrated ability to carry out common protocol;

o  adequacy of plans for effective cooperation and coordination among
participating awardees and the NCI Program Coordinator, as per
Special Requirements of the RFA;

o  adequacy of proposed number of study subjects to be recruited

o  Adequacy of plans to include both genders and minorities and their
subgroups as appropriate for the scientific goals of the research.
Plans for the recruitment and retention of subjects will also be
evaluated.

o  adequacy of proposed data to be collected and procedures for data
handling, managing, and preparing for analyses;

o  evidence that appropriate steps have been taken to insure the
rights of human subjects.

o  the scientific and technical significance or originality of the
proposed pilot studies in the field of translational breast cancer
research.  It is to be noted that the review of this part of the
grant application will be given much less weight relative to the
review of the registry facilities, procedures and epidemiological
data base, as no more than 10 percent of the total cost, or up to $
50,000 per year for three years (whichever number is smaller,
starting the second year of the Cooperative Agreement) may be
requested for these studies.

The review group will also examine the proposed budget and will
recommend an appropriate budget and period of support for each
application that is recommended for further consideration.

The second level of review by the National Cancer Advisory Board
considers the special needs of the NCI and the priorities of the
National Cancer Program.

AWARD CRITERIA

The earliest anticipated date of award is December 1, 1995.  The
following will be considered for making funding decisions:

o  scientific and technical merit of the proposed project as
determined by peer review;

o  availability of funds;

o  program balance among research areas.

INQUIRIES

Inquiries concerning the RFA and the opportunity to clarify any
issues or questions from potential applicants are welcome.

Direct inquiries regarding programmatic issues to:

Dr. Daniela Seminara
Division of Cancer Etiology
National Cancer Institute
Executive Plaza North, Suite 535
6130 Executive Boulevard MSC 7395
Bethesda, MD  20892-7395
Telephone:  (301) 496-9600
FAX:  (301) 402-4279
EMAIL:  SeminarD@NIHCDCE1.GOV

Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to:

Ms. Kelli Newball
Grants Management Specialist
National Cancer Institute
6120 Executive Boulevard
Executive Plaza South, Suite 243
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 496-7800, ext. 61

AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS

This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance No. 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research.  Awards
are made under authorization of the Public Health Service Act, Title
IV, Part A (Public Law 78-410, as amended by Public Law 99-158, 42
USC 241 and 285) and administered under PHS grants policies and
Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 45 CFR Part 74 and 92.  This
program is not subject to the intergovernmental review requirements
of Executive Order 12372 or Health Systems Agency review.

The Public Health Service strongly encourages all grant recipients to
provide a smoke-free workplace and promote the non-use of all tobacco
products.  This is consistent with the PHS mission to protect and
advance the physical and mental health of the American people.

From owner-sci-resources@net.bio.net Fri Nov 04 22:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: BIOSCI Administrator <biosci-help@net.bio.net>
Newsgroups: bionet.sci-resources
Subject: NIH GUIDE - RFA HL-95-008 - V23(39) 11/04/94
Date: 5 Nov 1994 12:35:03 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 417
Sender: biohelp@net.bio.net
Approved: biosci-moderator@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <39gq9n$kn@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

$$XID RFA HL95008 HL-95-008 P1O1 ***************************************

HUMAN STEM CELL SOURCES AND TRANSPLANTATION BIOLOGY

NIH GUIDE, Volume 23, Number 39, November 4, 1994

RFA:  HL-95-008

P.T. 34; K.W. 0710125, 0780015, 1002004

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

Letter of Intent Receipt Date:  February 13, 1995
Application Receipt Date:  March 16, 1995

PURPOSE

The Cellular Hematology Scientific Research Group, Blood Diseases
Program, Division of Blood Diseases and Resources, NHLBI and the
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
(NIDDK) announce the availability of a Request for Applications (RFA)
on the above subject.  The purpose of this initiative is to encourage
research aimed at providing a better understanding of the differences
between stem/progenitor cells from different sources such as bone
marrow, peripheral circulation of children and adults and
placental/cord blood.  Important studies to be pursued entail the
characterization of stem/progenitor cells for self-renewal,
proliferation, and expansion and the mechanisms involved in these
processes.  Also to be studied are the immune cells present in the
different tissue sources, and the mechanisms of their action in graft
vs. host disease, and in graft vs. leukemia effect.  The ultimate
goal is to identify the most appropriate cell populations capable of
sustaining long-term hematopoiesis in humans treated for malignant
and non-malignant diseases.

HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000

The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health
promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000,"
a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas.  This
initiative, Human Stem Cell Sources and Transplantation Biology, is
related to the priority area of maternal and infant health and
cancer.  Potential applicants may obtain a copy of Healthy People
2000 (Full Report:  Stock No. 017-001-00474-0) or "Healthy People
2000" (Summary Report:  Stock No. 017-001-00473-1) through the
Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington,
DC 20402-9325 (telephone 202-782-3238).

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

Applications may be submitted by domestic and foreign for-profit and
non-profit organizations, public and private, such as universities,
colleges, hospitals, laboratories, units of State or local
governments, and eligible agencies of the Federal government.  Awards
in response to this RFA will be made to foreign institutions only for
research of very unusual merit, need, and promise, and in accordance
with PHS policy governing such awards.  Foreign institutions are not
eligible for First Independent Research Support and Transition
(FIRST) (R29) awards.  Applications from minority individuals and
women are encouraged.

MECHANISM OF SUPPORT

This RFA will use the National Institutes of Health (NIH) individual
research project grant (R01) and FIRST (R29) award and is a one-time
solicitation.  Applicants, who will plan and execute their own
research programs, are requested to furnish their own estimates of
the time required to achieve the objectives of the proposed research
project.  For R01 grants, up to four years of support may be
requested.  FIRST (R29) awards must be for five years.  At the end of
the official award period, renewal applications may be submitted for
peer review and competition for support through the regular grant
program of the NHLBI or the NIDDK.  It is anticipated that support
for the present program will begin in September 1995.  Administrative
adjustments in project period and/or amount of support may be
required at the time of the award.  All current policies and
requirements that govern the research grant programs of the NIH will
apply to grants awarded in response to this RFA.

FUNDS AVAILABLE

Fiscal Year 1995 financial plans for the NHLBI include $1.5 million
for this program.  The NIDDK plans to allocate an additional
$500,000.  However, award of grants pursuant to this RFA is
contingent upon receipt of funds for this purpose.  It is anticipated
that the NHLBI will award approximately five new grants under this
program and the NIDDK about two.  The specific amount to be funded
will, however, depend on the merit and scope of the applications
received and on the availability of funds.  Since a variety of
approaches would represent valid responses to this RFA, it is
anticipated that there will be a range of costs among individual
grants awarded.  If collaborative arrangements involve sub-contracts
with other institutions, the NHLBI Grants Management Staff (tel:
301-594-7436) should be consulted regarding procedures to be
followed.  Designated funding levels and/or project period duration
are subject to change at any time prior to award, due to unforeseen
budgetary, administrative and/or scientific developments.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

The major objective of this initiative is to encourage research aimed
at providing a better understanding of the differences between
stem/progenitor cells from different sources such as bone marrow,
peripheral circulation of children and adults and placental/cord
blood.  Recent studies suggest that there may be important
differences between the various sources of transplantable
hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells.  Important studies to be pursued
entail the characterization of stem/progenitor cells for self-
renewal, proliferation, and expansion and the mechanisms involved in
these processes.  Also to be studied are the immune cells present in
the different tissue sources, and the mechanisms of their action in
graft vs. host disease, and in graft vs. leukemia effect.  The
ultimate goal is to identify the most appropriate cell populations
capable of sustaining long-term hematopoiesis in humans treated for
malignant and non-malignant diseases.

Circulating Stem/Progenitor and Immune Cells

Studies of over 45 cord blood transplants performed so far for a
number of malignant (AML, ALL, CML, JCML, solid tumor) and non-
malignant (Fanconi anemia, aplastic anemia, inborn errors of
metabolism, Wiscott-Aldrich, x-linked lymphoproliferative disease,
and beta thalassemia) diseases in children suggest that graft vs.
host disease (GVHD) has been very low with this source of engrafting
cells.  Additionally, growth factor- and/or chemotherapy mobilized
adult peripheral blood stem/progenitor cells are fast becoming a
source of transplantable autologous, and to a lesser extent,
allogeneic stem/progenitor cells.  Therefore, a comparative
assessment of the utility of cord blood, bone marrow and mobilized
peripheral blood, in both autologous and related/unrelated allogeneic
transplantation, are important studies to be pursued.  The assessment
would include characterization of potential differences in the
quality of stem and progenitor cells from these different sources in
terms of their capacity for proliferation, self-renewal, expansion,
and their responsiveness to cytokines and stromal cells.  Studies of
the mechanisms of GVH and graft vs. leukemia (GVL) effects of subsets
of blood lymphocytes, natural killer cells, and lymphokine-activated
killer cells from the various tissue sources are needed.

Future efforts in the area of chemotherapy- and/or growth factor-
induced mobilized adult peripheral blood stem/progenitor cells should
include: (a) optimization of mobilization techniques, better
characterization of the cells mobilized and whether the use of
different growth factors, at various doses and times will
differentially recruit different subsets of stem and progenitor
cells; (b) determination of whether or not the earliest long-term
marrow engrafting cells are present in mobilized adult peripheral
blood; and (c) determination of whether long-term engraftment is due
to the infused cells, or if the infused population only contains
shorter-term repopulating cells, which allow the donor/recipient
time for repopulation by endogenous, non-transplanted cells.  This
latter possibility has not been adequately studied, and may result
from the less myeloablative regimens used for autologous, as compared
to allogeneic transplantation.  Efforts here would require marking,
perhaps using retroviral vectors, of the mobilized, removed and
autologously transplanted cells.

Of considerable importance would be to study the capacity of these
different sources of stem and progenitor cells, such as cord blood
versus bone marrow, to serve as cellular vehicles for gene therapy.
Efforts aimed at the comparative efficacy of gene transduction of
subsets of these cells, especially those of the most immature
populations, including long-term marrow repopulating cells, could
hasten the use of gene therapy for the treatment of malignant and
non-malignant diseases.  Comparative cellular, molecular biological
and transplantation immunological studies of these cell sources could
provide critical information required to engineer the graft product
to provide the maximum therapeutic benefit in a variety of clinical
diseases states.

The above examples of research approaches are not meant to be all
inclusive or restrictive.  Investigators are encouraged to develop
their own innovative approaches to achieve the goals of this
initiative.  However, the proposed studies should focus on cells of
human origin but xenogeneic animal models for growth of human cells
can be considered as possible models for study of the earliest human
stem cells.

Exclusions

Epidemiological studies, large-scale clinical trials, and large
multi-project grant applications (program project grants) are
specifically excluded from this RFA.

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

Upon initiation of the program, the NHLBI and the NIDDK will sponsor
annual meetings to encourage an exchange of information among
investigators who participate in this program.  In preparing the
budget for the grant application, applicants should request
additional travel funds for one meeting each year to be held in
Bethesda, Maryland.  Applicants should also include a statement in
the application indicating their willingness to participate in such
meetings.

INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN
SUBJECTS

It is the policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups
and their subpopulations must be included in all NIH supported
biomedical and behavioral research projects involving human subjects,
unless a clear and compelling rationale and justification is provided
that inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health of the
subjects or the purpose of the research.  This new policy results
from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 (Section 492B of Public Law
103-43) and supersedes and strengthens the previous policies
(Concerning the Inclusion of Women in Study Populations, and
Concerning the Inclusion of Minorities in Study Populations) which
have been in effect since 1990.  The new policy contains some new
provisions that are substantially different from the 1990 policies.
All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should
read the "NIH Guidelines For Inclusion of Women and Minorities as
Subjects in Clinical Research," which have been published in the
Federal Register of March 28, 1994 (FR 59 14508-14513), and reprinted
in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts of March 18, 1994, Volume
23, Number 11.

Investigators may obtain copies from these sources or from the
program staff or contact person listed below.  Program staff may also
provide additional relevant information concerning the policy.

LETTER OF INTENT

Prospective applicants are asked to submit, by February 13, 1995, a
letter of intent that includes a descriptive title of the proposed
research, the name, address, and telephone number of the Principal
Investigator,  the identities of other key personnel and
participating institutions, and the number and title of the RFA in
response to which the application may be submitted.  Such letters are
requested only for the purpose of providing an indication of the
number and scope of applications to be received; therefore their
receipt is usually not acknowledged.  A letter of intent is not
binding, will not enter into the review of any application
subsequently submitted, nor is it a necessary requirement for the
application.  The letter of intent is to be sent to:

Dr. James Scheirer
Division of Extramural Affairs
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Westwood Building, Room 557A
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 594-7478
FAX:  (301) 594-7407
email:  James_Scheirer@NIH.Gov

APPLICATION PROCEDURES

Application Receipt Date:  March 16, 1995

Applications are to be submitted on the research grant application
form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91).  This form is available at most
institutional offices of sponsored research and from the Office of
Grants Information, Division of Research Grants, National Institutes
of Health, 5333 Westbard Avenue, Room 449, Bethesda, MD 20892,
telephone (301) 594-7248.  Use the conventional format for research-
project grant applications and ensure that the points identified in
the section REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS are fulfilled.  FIRST applications
must include at least three sealed letters of reference attached to
the face page of the original application.  FIRST applications
submitted without the required number of reference letters will be
considered incomplete and will be returned without review.

The RFA label available in the PHS 398 application kit must be
affixed to the bottom of the face page of the original copy of the
application.  Failure to use this label could result in delayed
processing of the application such that it may not reach the review
committee in time for review.  To identify the application as a
response to this RFA, check "YES" on Item 2a of page 1 of the
application and enter the title and RFA Number:  HUMAN STEM CELL
SOURCES AND TRANSPLANTATION BIOLOGY RFA HL-95-008.

Send or deliver the completed application and three signed, exact
photocopies of it to the following, making sure that the original
application with the RFA label attached is on top:

Division of Research Grants
National Institutes of Health
Westwood Building, Room 240
Bethesda, MD  20892**

Send an additional two copies of the application to the Chief, Review
Branch at the address listed under LETTER OF INTENT.  It is important
to send these two copies at the same time as the original and three
copies are sent to the Division of Research Grants (DRG).  Otherwise
the NHLBI cannot guarantee that the application will be reviewed in
competition for this RFA.

Applications must be received by March 16, 1995.  An application not
received by this date will be returned to the applicant without
review.  The DRG will not accept any application in response to this
RFA that is essentially the same as one currently pending initial
review, unless the applicant withdraws the pending application.  The
DRG will not accept any application that is the same as one already
reviewed.  This does not preclude the submission of substantial
revisions of applications already reviewed, but such applications
must include an introduction addressing the previous critique.

Although this RFA is a co-sponsored by the NHLBI and the NIDDK, the
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the
National Cancer Institute (NCI) also have an interest in research
focused at better understanding the differences between
stem/progenitor cells from different sources, including peripheral
blood.  The NCI also has an interest in research focused on immune
functions and graft-versus leukemia mechanisms.  Therefore, the NIAID
or the NCI may be given an institute assignment, as appropriate, in
accordance with NIH referral guidelines.

REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS

Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed for completeness and
responsiveness by the NIH.  Grant applications will be assigned
according to standard referral guidelines.  Incomplete applications
and applications deemed not responsive to the RFA will be returned to
the applicant without further consideration.

Applications that are complete and responsive to the RFA will be
evaluated for scientific and technical merit by an appropriate peer
review group convened by the NHLBI in accordance with the review
criteria stated below.  As part of the initial merit review, a
process (triage) may be used by the initial review group in which
applications will be determined to be competitive or non-competitive
based on their scientific merit relative to other applications
received in response to the RFA.  Applications judged to be
competitive will be discussed and be assigned a priority score.
Applications determined to be non-competitive will be withdrawn from
further consideration and the principal investigator/program director
and the official signing for the applicant organization will be
promptly notified.

The criteria used in evaluating the scientific merit of each
application will be similar to those used in the review of
traditional research project grant applications, including the
novelty, originality, and feasibility of the approach; the training,
experience and research competence of the investigator(s); the
adequacy of the experimental design; the suitability of the
facilities; the appropriateness of the requested budget to the work
proposed; and the adequacy of plans to include both genders and
minorities and their subgroups as appropriate for the scientific
goals of the research.

Applications should be prepared so that they can be reviewed without
the necessity of interaction between applicants and reviewers since
no site visit or reverse site visit will be part of the technical
merit review.

AWARD CRITERIA

The anticipated award date is September 1995.  Funding decisions will
be made on the basis of scientific and technical merit as determined
by peer review, program needs and balance, and the availability of
funds.

Awards in response to this RFA will be made to foreign institutions
only for research of very unusual merit, need, and promise, and in
accordance with PHS policy governing such awards.  Designated funding
levels are subject to change at any time prior to award, due to
unforeseen budgetary, administrative and/or scientific developments.

In order to more evenly distribute administrative workload and reduce
the number of awards with July 1 or September 30 start dates, ten
months of time and money will be awarded for the first competing
budget period of this project.  This action results in a project
period of 46 months rather than 48 months for R01 applications.
Investigators should plan their research projects and budgets within
these time frames.

INQUIRIES

Inquiries concerning this RFA are encouraged.  The opportunity to
clarify any issues or questions from potential applicants is welcome.

Helena O. Mishoe, Ph.D.
Division of Blood Diseases and Resources
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Federal Building, Room 5A12
Bethesda, MD 20892
Telephone:  (301) 496-5911
FAX:  (301) 496-9940
Email:  Helena_Mishoe@NIH.Gov

David G. Badman, Ph.D.
Division of Kidney, Urologic, and Hematologic Diseases
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Westwood Building, Room 3A05
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 594-7541
FAX:  (301) 594-7501
Email:  davidb@dvsgate.niddk.nih.gov

Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to:

Ms. Jane R. Davis
Division of Extramural Affairs
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Westwood Building, Room 4A11
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 594-7436
FAX:  (301) 594-7492
Email:  Jane_Davis@NIH.Gov

AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS

The programs of the Division of Blood Diseases and Resources, NHLBI,
are described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No.
93.839.  Awards are made under the authority of the Public Health
Service Act, Section 301 (42 USC 241) and administered under PHS
grant policies and Federal regulations, most specifically 42 CFR Part
52 and 45 CFR Part 74.  This program is not subject to the
intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or
Health Systems Agency review.

The Public Health Service (PHS) strongly encourages all grant
recipients to provide a smoke-free workplace and promote the non-use
of all tobacco products.  This is consistent with the PHS mission to
protect and advance the physical and mental health of the American
people.

From owner-sci-resources@net.bio.net Fri Nov 04 22:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: BIOSCI Administrator <biosci-help@net.bio.net>
Newsgroups: bionet.sci-resources
Subject: NIH Guide, vol. 23, no. 39, pt. 1of1, 4 November 1994
Date: 5 Nov 1994 12:34:56 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 563
Sender: biohelp@net.bio.net
Approved: biosci-moderator@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <39gq9g$kc@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

$$XID NIHGUIDE 19941104 V23N39 P1O1 ************************************
X-comment: RFAs described: HL-95-009, CA-95-003, HL-95-008

NIH GUIDE - Vol. 23, No. 39 - November 4, 1994

$$INDEX BEGIN *******************************************************

                               NOTICES

$$INDEX N1 **********************************************************

NIH GUIDE PUBLICATION DATES

$$INDEX N2 **********************************************************

PEER REVIEW APPEAL PROCESS
National Institutes of Health
INDEX:  NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH

$$INDEX N3 **********************************************************

CHANGE OF ADDRESS FOR THE OFFICE FOR PROTECTION FROM RESEARCH RISKS
National Institutes of Health
INDEX:  NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH

$$INDEX N4 **********************************************************

NATIONAL ANIMAL WELFARE EDUCATION WORKSHOP
National Institutes of Health
INDEX:  NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH

               NOTICES OF AVAILABILITY (RFPs/RFAs/PAs)

$$INDEX R1 **********************************************************

CLINICAL TRIALS OF ANTIFUNGAL THERAPIES (RFP NIH-NIAID-DMID-96-04)
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
INDEX:  ALLERGY, INFECTIOUS DISEASES

$$INDEX R2 01/24/95 *************************************************

CYTOKINE EFFECTS ON HEMATOPOIESIS IN AIDS ANIMAL MODELS (RFA
HL-95-009) National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
INDEX:  HEART, LUNG, BLOOD

$$INDEX R3 02/17/95 *************************************************

COOPERATIVE FAMILY REGISTRY FOR EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES OF BREAST
CANCER (RFA CA-95-003)
National Cancer Institute
INDEX:  CANCER

$$INDEX R4 03/16/95 *************************************************

HUMAN STEM CELL SOURCES AND TRANSPLANTATION BIOLOGY (RFA HL-95-008)
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
INDEX:  HEART, LUNG, BLOOD; DIABETES, DIGESTIVE, KIDNEY DISEASES

THIS PUBLICATION IS AVAILABLE ELECTRONICALLY VIA BITNET OR INTERNET
AND IS ALSO ON THE NIH GOPHER (gopher.nih.gov).  ALTERNATIVE ACCESS
IS THROUGH THE NIH GRANT LINE USING A PERSONAL COMPUTER (DATA LINE
301/402-2221).  CONTACT DR. JOHN JAMES AT 301/594-7270 FOR DETAILS.

THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE (PHS) STRONGLY ENCOURAGES ALL GRANT
RECIPIENTS TO PROVIDE A SMOKE-FREE WORKPLACE AND PROMOTE THE NON-USE
OF ALL TOBACCO PRODUCTS.  THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PHS MISSION TO
PROTECT AND ADVANCE THE PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH OF THE AMERICAN
PEOPLE.

$$INDEX END *********************************************************

                               NOTICES

$$N1 BEGIN **********************************************************

THE NIH GUIDE FOR GRANTS AND CONTRACTS WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED ON
NOVEMBER 11, 1994.  THE NEXT ISSUE OF THE NIH GUIDE WILL BE ON
NOVEMBER 18, 1994.

$$N1 END ************************************************************

$$N2 BEGIN **********************************************************

PEER REVIEW APPEAL PROCESS

NIH GUIDE, Volume 23, Number 39, November 4, 1994

P.T. 34; K.W. 1014006

National Institutes of Health

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) provide an applicant who
feels that some aspect of the handling or peer review of his/her
grant application has been inappropriate, biased, or wrong with two
sequential opportunities (respectively referred to as "rebuttals" and
"appeals") to have his/her concerns addressed.  The first opportunity
is after receipt of the summary statement that documents the results
of the initial review of an application's scientific and/or technical
merit.  If the applicant submits a letter rebutting the review to the
program administrator who is responsible for the application, that
letter will usually be made available to the National Advisory
Council/Board of the relevant NIH Institute/Center/Division (ICD) for
consideration, if the ICD staff cannot handle the concerns
administratively.  The Council may recommend that the application be
deferred and rereviewed, if the applicant's objections are deemed to
have merit.  However, should the Council not recommend deferral and
rereview but concur with the initial review and deem that it should
stand, then the applicant has a second opportunity to have his/her
concerns heard, by submitting a formal appeal of the Council's
decision.

"The PI and the applicant institution, represented by the
institutional official authorized to sign applications, must jointly
sign an appeal and send it to the NIH Peer Review Appeals Officer.
The official representative's signature indicates that the applicant
institution endorses both form and substance of the appeal" (ref: NIH
Manual Chapter 4518).  The appeal letter must explain fully the
reasons for the disagreement, append supporting documentation, and be
sent to:

NIH Appeals Officer
Office of the Director
National Institutes of Health
Building 1, Room 328
Bethesda, MD  20892

Two points that are important for applicants considering an appeal to
weigh for themselves concern the possible outcomes and the timing of
the appeal process.  The most favorable possible outcome for an
applicant in an appeal case can only be a decision that the
application in question be rereviewed, since appeals cases examine
only whether there were any flaws in the peer review process.  The
other possible outcome is that the review of the application was not
substantially flawed and any minor flaws in the review did not affect
the recommendation regarding the application.  In that case, the
review would stand and the application would not be rereviewed.  As
the conduct of an appeal case involves several steps of process and
review, it may take at least four months (or one review cycle) to
complete.  Thus, given, the possible outcomes and the timing of the
appeal process, an applicant may wish to consider whether
deficiencies in the review of his/her application were substantive
enough to have had a major deleterious effect on the review of the
application and, if not, to revise and resubmit the application
instead.

Applicant concerns about the acceptance for review, responsiveness to
a Request for Applications, other receipt issues, or the referral of
their application, when submitted prior to the initial review, are
entirely the responsibility of the Division of Research Grants (DRG)
or of the ICD assigned to review the application (as indicated on the
computer-generated notice of assignments sent to applicants).  This
DRG or ICD process also provides two opportunities for applicant
concerns to be addressed.

As they are actions that are external to the peer review process,
decisions regarding the funding of applications may not be appealed.

INQUIRIES

For additional information about the peer review appeal process or to
discuss a particular matter, contact Dr. Janet Cuca at 301/496-5358.

$$N2 END ************************************************************

$$N3 BEGIN **********************************************************

CHANGE OF ADDRESS FOR THE OFFICE FOR PROTECTION FROM RESEARCH RISKS

NIH GUIDE, Volume 23, Number 39, November 4, 1994

P.T. 34; K.W. 1014006

National Institutes of Health

Effective November 7, 1994, the address for the Office for Protection
from Research Risks (OPRR) is:

Office for Protection from Research Risks
National Institutes of Health
6100 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7507
Rockville, MD  20892-7507

The address for express or hand-delivered mail is:

Office for Protection from Research Risks
National Institutes of Health
6100 Executive Boulevard, Suite 3B01
Rockville, MD  20852-7507

$$N3 END ************************************************************

$$N4 BEGIN **********************************************************

NATIONAL ANIMAL WELFARE EDUCATION WORKSHOP

NIH GUIDE, Volume 23, Number 39, November 4, 1994

P.T. 42; K.W. 0201011, 1014003

National Institutes of Health

The National Institutes of Health, Office of Extramural Research,
Office for Protection from Research Risks, is co-sponsoring a
National Animal Welfare Education Workshop with the Medical
University of South Carolina on December 1-2, 1994.  The topic is
"NEW FRONTIERS IN SURGERY."  The workshop will be held at the
Sheraton Inn, 170 Lockwood Drive, Charleston, SC 29403, telephone
(800) 968-3669 or (803) 723-3000.  The cut-off date for reservations
is November 15, 1994.  Accommodations should be made as soon as
possible since hotel space is at a premium in Charleston.

The day and a half program will focus on state-of-the-art surgical
procedures as it applies to the use of animals in biomedical and
behavioral research.  An exceptional slate of speakers will address
Xenographic Procedures; Fetal Intervention; Transgenic Technologies;
Orthopedic Biomaterials; IACUC Issues and Ethical Issues in Surgical
Research and Development.

The workshop is open to institutional administrators, members of
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees, laboratory animal
veterinarians, investigators and other institutional staff who have
responsibility for high-quality management of institutional animal
care and use programs.  Ample opportunities will be provided to
exchange ideas and interests through question and answer sessions and
informal discussions.

The registration fee is $150.00 before November 15; $175.00 after
that date and at the registration desk.  The registration fee
includes workshop materials, two continental breakfasts, refreshment
breaks, one buffet lunch, and a reception.

INQUIRIES

To register for this workshop, contact:

M. Michael Swindle, D.V.M.
Comparative Medicine, MUSC
171 Ashley Avenue, Room 704-BSB
Charleston, SC  29425-2216
Telephone:  (803) 792-3625
FAX:  (803) 792-9067

For information concerning future NIH/OPRR Animal Welfare Education
Workshops, contact:

Mrs. Roberta Sonneborn
Office for Protection from Research Risks
National Institutes of Health
6100 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7507
Rockville, MD  20892-7507
Telephone:  (301) 496-7163
FAX:  (301) 402-2803

$$N4 END ************************************************************

               NOTICES OF AVAILABILITY (RFPs/RFAs/PAs)

$$R1 BEGIN NIH-NIAID-DMID-96-04 *************************************

CLINICAL TRIALS OF ANTIFUNGAL THERAPIES

NIH GUIDE, Volume 23, Number 39, November 4, 1994

RFP AVAILABLE:  NIH-NIAID-DMID-96-04

P.T. 34; K.W. 0755015, 0715103

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

The Bacteriology and Mycology Branch, Division of Microbiology and
Infectious Diseases of the National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases (NIAID) has a requirement for a collaborative
clinical trials group for serious fungal infections to include those
caused by Candida, Aspergillus, Cryptococcus, Coccidioides,
Histoplasma, and Blastomyces.  A clinical trials program will be
designed to facilitate advances in antifungal therapy by rigorously
determining the efficacy and safety of new therapeutic regimens for
serious mycotic diseases.  The program will be driven by a scientific
agenda with proposed studies that will address the most important
gaps in treatment, the appropriate fungal pathogens and risk groups.
Risk groups of emphasis are HIV infected patients, neutropenic cancer
patients, bone marrow and organ transplant patients, and surgical
trauma patients.  Provision should also be made for the key
management problems with the endemic mycoses in immunocompetent
hosts.

This group will conduct Phase II and Phase III clinical trials to
evaluate antifungal therapies including, but not limited to new
agents, formulations, dosing regimens, drug combinations, as well as
immunebased therapeutics.

Request for Proposals (RFP) No. NIH-NIAID-DMID-96-04 will be
available on or about November 15, 1994.  Responses will be due at
close of business February 15, 1995.  It is anticipated that one,
cost reimbursement, completion contract will be awarded for a period
of five years.  All interested offerors are encouraged to submit a
proposal.  Any responsible offeror may submit a proposal that will be
considered by the Government.

INQUIRIES

To receive a copy of the RFP, supply this office with two self-
addressed mailing labels.  Telephone inquiries will not be honored
and all inquiries must be in writing and addressed to:

Mr. Anthony J. Murray
Contract Management Branch
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
6003 Executive Boulevard MSC 7610
Solar Building, Room 3C07
Bethesda, MD  20892-7610

Interested organizations should request either a streamlined or full
RFP package.  If no selection is made, a streamlined version of the
RFP will be provided, which includes only the Statement of Work,
deliverable and reporting requirements, special requirements and
mandatory qualifications, if any, and the Technical Evaluation
Criteria.  After examination of the abbreviated document, any
organization interested in responding to the RFP must request the
entire RFP in writing or by FAX request (301) 480-5253.  This
advertisement does not commit the Government to award a contract.

$$R1 END ************************************************************

$$R2 BEGIN HL-95-009 FULL-TEXT **************************************

CYTOKINE EFFECTS ON HEMATOPOIESIS IN AIDS ANIMAL MODELS

NIH GUIDE, Volume 23, Number 39, November 4, 1994

RFA AVAILABLE:  HL-95-009

P.T. 34; K.W. 0715008, 0755020, 1002004

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Letter of Intent Receipt Date:  December 16, 1994
Application Receipt Date:  January 24, 1995

PURPOSE

The Cellular Hematology Scientific Research Group, Blood Diseases
Program, Division of Blood Diseases and Resources, National Heart,
Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) announces the availability of a
Request for Applications (RFA) on the above subject.  The purpose of
this initiative is to study animal models of human acquired
immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) to increase our understanding of
clinical consequences and/or efficacy of hematopoietic factors used
in HIV-1 infected persons.  The complexity of HIV disease makes it
difficult to assess cytokine effects exclusively in the patient.
Thus, this initiative will primarily focus on animal models of human
AIDS that could be directly related to future human clinical studies.
However, focused cytokine studies in HIV-1 infected persons will be
considered.  This RFA will use the National Institutes of Health
(NIH) research project grant (R01) and First Independent Research
Support and Transition (FIRST) (R29) awards.  The NHLBI has set-aside
$1.5 million dollars to fund approximately six new grants under this
program.

HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000

The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health
promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000,"
a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas.  This RFA,
Cytokine Effects on Hematopoiesis in AIDS Animal Models, is related
to the priority area of HIV infection.  Potential applicants may
obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2000" (Full Report:  Stock No.
017-001-00474-0) or "Healthy People 2000" (Summary Report:  Stock No.
017-001-00473-1) through the Superintendent of Documents, Government
Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (telephone 202-782-3238).

INQUIRIES

The RFA, which describes the research objectives, application
procedures, review considerations, and award criteria for this
solicitation, may be obtained electronically through the NIH Grant
Line (data line 301/402-2221) and the NIH GOPHER (gopher.nih.gov) and
by mail and email from the program contact listed below.

Helena O. Mishoe, Ph.D.
Division of Blood Diseases and Resources
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Federal Building, Room 5A12
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 496-5911
FAX:  (301) 496-9940
Email:  Helena_Mishoe@NIH.Gov

$$R2 END ************************************************************

$$R3 BEGIN CA-95-003 FULL-TEXT **************************************

COOPERATIVE FAMILY REGISTRY FOR EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES OF BREAST
CANCER

NIH GUIDE, Volume 23, Number 39, November 4, 1994

RFA AVAILABLE:  CA-95-003

P.T. 34; K.W. 0715036, 0785055, 0780030

National Cancer Institute

Letter of Intent Receipt Date:  November 30, 1995
Application Receipt Date:  February 17, 1995

PURPOSE

The Extramural Programs Branch, Epidemiology and Biostatistics
Program, Division of Cancer Etiology, National Cancer Institute (NCI)
invites cooperative agreement applications from investigators to
participate, with the assistance of the NCI, in a network of
organizations constituting a Cooperative Family Registry for Breast
Cancer (CFRBC).

The purpose of the proposed awards is to stimulate a cooperative
effort to:

1.  Collect pedigree information, epidemiological data and related
biological specimens from patients with a family history of breast
cancer in order to provide a registry resource for interdisciplinary
studies on the etiology of breast cancer, and to encourage
translational research in this area.

2.  Identify a population at high risk for breast cancer that could
benefit from new preventive and therapeutic strategies.

The CFRBC will enable participant organizations to: identify
individuals with a family history of breast cancer, breast-ovarian
cancer syndrome, male breast cancer, and various familial syndromes
that include breast cancer; collect and define the related pedigrees;
and collect clinical (tumor type, stage at diagnosis, hormonal
evaluation, etc.), epidemiologic (age at diagnosis, sociodemographic
status, etc.), and other relevant data (such as dietary history) to
correlate with the pedigree information.  Support for the collection
of related biological specimens, such as blood samples, paraffin
blocks and fresh-frozen tissue, will be included.  This registry is
not intended to directly support research on the mapping and cloning
of the gene(s) for breast or breast/ovarian cancer, but to assist
investigators funded through other sources by providing the data and
biological specimens that can be used for a variety of purposes,
including etiologic studies and prevention and treatment-oriented
translational research.

Approximately $2 million in total costs per year for four years will
be committed to specifically fund applications which are submitted in
response to this RFA.  It is anticipated that two to five awards will
be made.  This funding level is dependent on the receipt of a
sufficient number of applications of high scientific merit.

HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000

The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health
promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000,"
a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas.  This Request
for Applications (RFA), Cooperative Family Registry for Epidemiologic
Studies of Breast Cancer, relates to the priority area of cancer.
Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2000" (Full
Report:  Stock No. 017-001-00474-0 or Summary Report:  Stock No.
017-001-00473-1) through the Superintendent of Documents, Government
Printing Office, Washington DC 20402-9325 (telephone 202-783-3238).

INQUIRIES

The RFA, which describes the research objectives, application
procedures, review considerations and award criteria for this
solicitation, may be obtained electronically through the NIH Grant
Line (data line 301-402-2221) via the NIH GOPHER (gopher.nih.gov),
and by mail and email from the program contact listed below.

Dr. Daniela Seminara
Division of Cancer Etiology
National Cancer Institute
Executive Plaza North, Suite 535
6130 Executive Boulevard MSC 7395
Bethesda, MD  20892-7395
Telephone:  (301) 496-9600
FAX:  (301) 402-4279
EMAIL:  SeminarD@NIHCDCE1.GOV

$$R3 END ************************************************************

$$R4 BEGIN HL-95-008 FULL-TEXT **************************************

HUMAN STEM CELL SOURCES AND TRANSPLANTATION BIOLOGY

NIH GUIDE, Volume 23, Number 39, November 4, 1994

RFA AVAILABLE:  HL-95-008

P.T. 34; K.W. 0710125, 0780015, 1002004

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

Letter of Intent Receipt Date:  February 13, 1995
Application Receipt Date:  March 16, 1995

PURPOSE

The Cellular Hematology Scientific Research Group, Blood Diseases
Program, Division of Blood Diseases and Resources, NHLBI and the
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
(NIDDK) announce the availability of a Request for Applications (RFA)
on the above subject.  The purpose of this initiative is to encourage
research aimed at providing a better understanding of the differences
between stem/progenitor cells from different sources such as bone
marrow, peripheral circulation of children and adults and
placental/cord blood.  Important studies to be pursued entail the
characterization of stem/progenitor cells for self-renewal,
proliferation, and expansion and the mechanisms involved in these
processes.  Also to be studied are the immune cells present in the
different tissue sources, and the mechanisms of their action in graft
vs. host disease, and in graft vs. leukemia effect.  The ultimate
goal is to identify the most appropriate cell populations capable of
sustaining long-term hematopoiesis in humans treated for malignant
and non-malignant diseases.  This RFA will use the National
Institutes of Health research project grant (R01) and First
Independent Research Support and Transition (FIRST) (R29) award.
Approximately $1.5 million dollars from the NHLBI and $500,000 from
the NIDDK has been set-aside to award five to seven grants.

HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000

The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health
promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000,"
a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas.  This
initiative, Human Stem Cell Sources and Transplantation Biology, is
related to the priority area of maternal and infant health and
cancer.  Potential applicants may obtain a copy of Healthy People
2000 (Full Report:  Stock No. 017-001-00474-0) or "Healthy People
2000" (Summary Report:  Stock No. 017-001-00473-1) through the
Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington,
DC 20402-9325 (telephone 202-782-3238).

INQUIRIES

The RFA, which describes the research objectives, application
procedures, review considerations, and award criteria for this
solicitation, may be obtained electronically through the NIH Grant
Line (data line 301/402-2221) and the NIH GOPHER (gopher.nih.gov),
and by mail and email from the program contact listed below.

Helena O. Mishoe, Ph.D.
Division of Blood Diseases and Resources
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Federal Building, Room 5A12
Bethesda, MD 20892
Telephone:  (301) 496-5911
FAX:  (301) 496-9940
email:  Helena_Mishoe@NIH.Gov

David G. Badman, Ph.D.
Division of Kidney, Urologic, and Hematologic Diseases
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Westwood Building, Room 3A05
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 594-7541
FAX:  (301) 594-7501
email:  davidb@dvsgate.niddk.nih.gov

$$R4 END ************************************************************

From owner-sci-resources@net.bio.net Fri Nov 04 22:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: BIOSCI Administrator <biosci-help@net.bio.net>
Newsgroups: bionet.sci-resources
Subject: NIH GUIDE - RFA HL-95-009 - V23(39) 11/04/94
Date: 5 Nov 1994 12:35:17 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 522
Sender: biohelp@net.bio.net
Approved: biosci-moderator@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <39gqa5$li@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

$$XID RFA HL95009 HL-95-009 P1O1 ***************************************

CYTOKINE EFFECTS ON HEMATOPOIESIS IN AIDS ANIMAL MODELS

NIH GUIDE, Volume 23, Number 39, November 4, 1994

RFA:  HL-95-009

P.T. 34; K.W. 0715008, 0755020, 1002004

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Letter of Intent Receipt Date:  December 16, 1994
Application Receipt Date:  January 24, 1995

PURPOSE

The Cellular Hematology Scientific Research Group, Blood Diseases
Program, Division of Blood Diseases and Resources, NHLBI announces
the availability of a Request for Applications (RFA) on the above
subject.  The purpose of this initiative is to study animal models of
human acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) to increase our
understanding of clinical consequences and/or efficacy of
hematopoietic factors used in HIV-1 infected persons.  The complexity
of HIV disease makes it difficult to assess cytokine effects
exclusively in the patient.  Thus, this initiative will primarily
focus on animal models of human AIDS that could be directly related
to future human clinical studies.  However, focused cytokine studies
in HIV-1 infected persons will be considered.

HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000

The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health
promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000,"
a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas.  This
initiative, Cytokine Effects on Hematopoiesis in AIDS Animal Models,
is related to the priority area of HIV infection.  Potential
applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2000" (Full Report:
Stock No. 017-001-00474-0) or "Healthy People 2000" (Summary Report:
Stock No. 017-001-00473-1) through the Superintendent of Documents,
Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (telephone
202-782-3238).

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

Applications may be submitted by domestic and foreign for-profit and
non-profit organizations, public and private, such as universities,
colleges, hospitals, laboratories, units of State or local
governments, and eligible agencies of the Federal government.  Awards
in response to this RFA will be made to foreign institutions only for
research of very unusual merit, need, and promise, and in accordance
with PHS policy governing such awards.  Foreign institutions are not
eligible for First Independent Research Support and Transition
(FIRST) (R29) awards.  Applications from minority individuals and
women are encouraged.

MECHANISM OF SUPPORT

This RFA will use the National Institutes of Health (NIH) individual
research project grant (R01) and FIRST (R29) award and is a one-time
solicitation.  Applicants, who will plan and execute their own
research programs, are requested to furnish their own estimates of
the time required to achieve the objectives of the proposed research
project.  Up to five years of support may be requested.  At the end
of the official award period, renewal applications may be submitted
for peer review and competition for support through the regular grant
program of the NHLBI.  It is anticipated that support for the present
program will begin in August 1995.  Administrative adjustments in
project period and/or amount of support may be required at the time
of the award.  All current policies and requirements that govern the
research grant programs of the NIH will apply to grants awarded in
response to this RFA.

FUNDS AVAILABLE

Fiscal Year 1995 financial plans for the NHLBI include $1.5 million
for this program.  However, award of grants pursuant to this RFA is
contingent upon receipt of funds for this purpose.  It is anticipated
that the NHLBI will award approximately six new grants under this
program.  The specific amount to be funded will, however, depend on
the merit and scope of the applications received and on the
availability of funds.  Since a variety of approaches would represent
valid responses to this RFA, it is anticipated that there will be a
range of costs among individual grants awarded.  If collaborative
arrangements involve sub-contracts with other institutions, the NHLBI
Grants Management Staff (tel: 301-594-7436) should be consulted
regarding procedures to be followed.  Designated funding levels
are/or project period duration are subject to change at anytime due
unforeseen budgetary administrative and/or scientific developments.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

AIDS remains among the most important public health challenges in the
United States and abroad.  The disease has managed to affect every
segment of the population including the fetus and the newborn.
Current estimates of HIV-1 prevalence place the number of HIV-1
infected individuals around one million.  Early this fall, the
Centers for Disease Control plans to release a new estimate of the
prevalence of HIV-1 infection in the United States.

The natural history of HIV infection is characterized by an abundance
of hematologic complications. Anemia is the most frequent abnormality
and is manifest at presentation in up to 20 percent of patients.  By
end-stage disease, 75 to 100 percent of patients become anemic (1,2).
Thrombocytopenia and diminished marrow production are seen throughout
all stages of AIDS.  Leukopenia, consisting of monocytopenia.
neutropenia, and lymphopenia, correlates with the stage of disease
and as seen in anemia, is worsened with azidothymidine (3).
Zidovudine, trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole, and ganciclovir all can
produce or contribute to cytopenias.  Reduced marrow reserves and
cytopenias complicate treatment for not only HIV but also HIV related
malignancies and opportunistic infections.

The past decade has witnessed the cloning and characterization of
multiple hematopoietic growth factors and cytokines.  As a result,
cytokines have been used clinically in HIV-1 infection to treat
persons with HIV-related cytopenias resulting in improved management
of these complications.  Although cytokines have generally been well
tolerated in clinical use, a number of important questions still
remain regarding their use in HIV-1 infected individuals.

Granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and
granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) are very frequently
used to manage HIV-1-related neutropenia.  In phase I trials, GM-CSF
has produced an increase in peripheral neutrophils and eosinophils
and a slight rise in monocytes when it was administered to
individuals with AIDS-related neutropenia (4,5).  Although some
investigators have reported that neutrophil function improves in
these patients (6), others have reported that neutrophils released
from the bone marrow after administration of the drug are
dysfunctional (7).  Also of some concern to clinicians, is the
demonstration that in vitro, GM-CSF potentiates HIV-1 replication
(8,9).

G-CSF has also been used in the treatment of individuals with HIV-1
infection.  Unlike GM-CSF, G-CSF has not been shown to increase the
activity of HIV-1 in monocytes and macrophages (10) and also elicits
fewer toxicities than GM-CSF (11).  Although G-CSF has been shown to
increase circulating neutrophils in patients with HIV infection (12),
it is not clear if this response translates into fewer infections or
increased survival.  Other cytokines including M-CSF and
interleukin-3 (IL-3) have also been characterized, but few studies
detail their clinical use. M-CSF induces proliferation of mononuclear
cells and has been shown to potentiate the infection of HIV-1 (13).
Additionally, IL-3 has been shown to stimulate multiple hematopoietic
cell lines (14), but it too has been associated with an increase in
HIV proliferation in vitro by infected macrophages and monocytes.
Alpha interferon has been reported to have an anti-viral effect when
administered to individuals with HIV infection (15).

Important questions still remain regarding the use of cytokines in
HIV-1 infected individuals.  Cytokine effects on hematopoietic cells
and stromal elements have been primarily demonstrated in vitro with
very little information available about their effects in vivo.  Since
these factors typically have multiple actions, some of these actions
may be undesirable in a given case.  In fact, when one gives a single
factor, no less than three general events occur:  (a) the blood level
of the factor increases and the biological activity of that factor is
exerted; (b) the factor induces auxiliary cells to release other
cytokines; and (c) the administered factor will act synergistically
with at least some of the endogenous factors it induces.  Thus, the
current view that hematopoietic growth factors simply stimulate the
production of more white cells or the proliferation and/or
differentiation of stem/progenitor cells, may inappropriately
trivialize the physiologic events that take place in HIV-1 infected
individuals when cytokines are administered.

The many and complex opportunistic infections, neoplasms, and drug
treatments, both prophylactic and active, make it difficult to
unravel the pathogenesis of HIV disease.  These phenomena
significantly contribute to the difficulties in assessing the
advantages and disadvantages of the use of cytokines in AIDS
patients.  Therefore, to gain insight into this important area, this
RFA will focus primarily on the use of animal models of human AIDS.
Recently, studies have demonstrated differences between the levels of
viral burden and virus replication in peripheral blood versus
lymphoid organs (16).  Animal models could potentially provide a
unique opportunity to assess these differences with larger numbers
and to determine the impact of the use of cytokines on virus
replication.  In addition, animal models will undoubtedly continue to
prove useful for studies of anti-HIV gene therapy strategies.  The
utility of animal models to study the pathogenesis of AIDS has been
extensively reviewed (17,18).

This RFA encourages applications that propose studies designed to
better assess the use of hematopoietic factors in HIV-1 infected
individuals.  The primary focus of this RFA is to conduct the above
assessment in animal models of human AIDS.  The proposed studies
should be directly related to evolution to future human clinical
studies.  Moreover, in vitro studies proposed should have an in vivo
endpoint.  Also, recent PCR technology would allow focused cytokine
studies to be conducted in HIV-1 infected persons.  Therefore,
appropriate studies assessing the effects of cytokines in HIV-1
infected individuals will be considered.  Research approaches that
would be considered responsive to the program would include studies
to (a) develop new animal models of human AIDS to better assess
cytokine use in HIV-1 infected persons; (b) evaluate the effect(s) of
cytokines used clinically in HIV-1 infected persons on viral burden,
viral persistence, and viral infectivity of stem/progenitor cells and
stromal elements; (c) evaluate the interplay of exogenously added
cytokines and endogenous cytokines induced by HIV infection; (d)
assess the different compartments of HIV-1 virus replication (i.e.,
peripheral blood vs. lymphoid tissue) and determine the impact of the
use of cytokines on viral replication; and (e) evaluate the effects
of cytokines on potential anti-HIV gene therapy treatment approaches
(i.e., genetically altered stem/progenitor cell transplantation).

The above examples of research approaches are not meant to be all
inclusive or restrictive.  Investigators are encouraged to develop
their own innovative approaches to achieve the goals of this
initiative.

Exclusions

Epidemiological studies, large-scale clinical trials, and large
multi-project grant applications (program project grants) are
specifically excluded from this RFA.  Also, research focused on
testing the effectiveness of vaccines for HIV infection is excluded.

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

Upon initiation of the program, the NHLBI will sponsor annual
meetings to encourage an exchange of information among investigators
who participate in this program.  In preparing the budget for the
grant application, applicants should request additional travel funds
for one meeting each year to be held in Bethesda, Maryland.
Applicants should also include a statement in the application
indicating their willingness to participate in such meetings.

INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN
SUBJECTS

It is the policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups
and their subpopulations must be included in all NIH supported
biomedical and behavioral research projects involving human subjects,
unless a clear and compelling rationale and justification is provided
that inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health of the
subjects or the purpose of the research.  This new policy results
from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 (Section 492B of Public Law
103-43) and supersedes and strengthens the previous policies
(Concerning the Inclusion of Women in Study Populations, and
Concerning the Inclusion of Minorities in Study Populations) which
have been in effect since 1990.  The new policy contains some new
provisions that are substantially different from the 1990 policies.
All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should
read the "NIH Guidelines For Inclusion of Women and Minorities as
Subjects in Clinical Research," which have been published in the
Federal Register of March 28, 1994 (FR 59 14508-14513), and reprinted
in the NIH GUIDE FOR GRANTS AND CONTRACTS of March 18, 1994, Volume
23, Number 11.

Investigators may obtain copies from these sources or from the
program staff or contact person listed under INQUIRIES.  Program
staff may also provide additional relevant information concerning the
policy.

LETTER OF INTENT

Prospective applicants are asked to submit, by December 16, 1994, a
letter of intent that includes a descriptive title of the proposed
research, the name, address, and telephone number of the Principal
Investigator, the identities of other key personnel and participating
institutions, and the number and title of the RFA in response to
which the application may be submitted.  Such letters are requested
only for the purpose of providing an indication of the number and
scope of applications to be received; therefore their receipt is
usually not acknowledged.  A letter of intent is not binding, it will
not enter into the review of any application subsequently submitted,
nor is it a necessary requirement for the application.

This letter of intent is to be sent to:

Dr. James Scheirer
Division of Extramural Affairs
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Westwood Building, Room 557A
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 594-7478
FAX:  (301) 594-7407
Email:  James_Scheirer@NIH.Gov

APPLICATION PROCEDURES

Application Receipt Date:  January 24, 1995

Applications are to be submitted on the research grant application
form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91).  This form is available in at most
institutional offices of sponsored research and from the Office of
Grants Information, Division of Research Grants, National Institutes
of Health, 5333 Westbard Avenue, Room 449, Bethesda, MD 20892,
telephone (301) 594-7248.  Use the conventional format for research
project grant applications and ensure that the points identified in
the section REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS are fulfilled.  FIRST applications
must include at least three sealed letters of reference attached to
the face page of the original application.  FIRST applications
submitted without the required number of reference letters will be
considered incomplete and will be returned without review.

The RFA label available in the PHS 398 application kit must be
affixed to the bottom of the face page of the original copy of the
application.  Failure to use this label could result in delayed
processing of the application such that it may not reach the review
committee in time for review.  To identify the application as a
response to this RFA, check "YES" on Item 2a of page 1 of the
application and enter the title and RFA Number:  CYTOKINE EFFECTS ON
HEMATOPOIESIS IN AIDS ANIMAL MODELS RFA HL-95-009.

Send or deliver the completed application and three signed, exact
photocopies of it to the following, making sure that the original
application with the RFA label attached is on top:

Division of Research Grants
National Institutes of Health
Westwood Building, Room 240
Bethesda, MD  20892**

Send an additional two copies of the application to the Chief, Review
Branch at the address listed under LETTER OF INTENT.  It is important
to send these two copies at the same time as the original and three
copies are sent to the Division of Research Grants (DRG).  Otherwise
the NHLBI cannot guarantee that the application will be reviewed in
competition for this RFA.

Applications must be received by January 24, 1995.  An application
not received by this date will be returned to the applicant without
review.  The DRG will not accept any application in response to this
RFA that is essentially the same as one currently pending initial
review, unless the applicant withdraws the pending application.  The
DRG will not accept any application that is the same as one already
reviewed.  This does not preclude the submission of substantial
revisions of applications already reviewed, but such applications
must include an introduction addressing the previous critique.

Although this is an RFA from the NHLBI, the National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the National Institute of
Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) also have an
interest in research focused on the role of cytokines in AIDS and the
development of AIDS animal models.  In addition, the National Cancer
Institute (NCI) has an interest in the role of cytokines in AIDS
pathogenesis particularly, in the development of AIDS- associated
malignancies.  Therefore, the NIAID, the NCI or the NIDDK may be
given an institute assignment in accordance with NIH referral
guidelines.

REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS

Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed for completeness and
responsiveness by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Incomplete applications and applications deemed not responsive to the
RFA will be returned to the applicant without further consideration.

Applications that are complete and responsive to the RFA will be
evaluated for scientific and technical merit by an appropriate peer
review group convened by the NHLBI in accordance with the review
criteria stated below.  As part of the initial merit review, a
process (triage) may be used by the initial review group in which
applications will be determined to be competitive or non-competitive
based on their scientific merit relative to other applications
received in response to the RFA.  Applications judged to be
competitive will be discussed and be assigned a priority score.
Applications determined to be non-competitive will be withdrawn from
further consideration and the principal investigator/program director
and the official signing for the applicant organization will be
promptly notified.

The criteria used in evaluating the scientific merit of each
application will be similar to those used in the review of
traditional research-project grant applications, including the
novelty, originality, and feasibility of the approach; the training,
experience and research competence of the investigator(s); the
adequacy of the experimental design; the suitability of the
facilities; the appropriateness of the requested budget to the work
proposed; and the adequacy of plans to include both genders and
minorities and their subgroups as appropriate for the scientific
goals of the research.

Applications should be prepared so that they can be reviewed without
the necessity of interaction between applicants and reviewers since
no site visit or reverse site visit will be part of the technical
merit review.

AWARD CRITERIA

The anticipated date of award is August 1995.  Funding decisions will
be made on the basis of scientific and technical merit as determined
by peer review, program needs and balance, and the availability of
funds.

Awards in response to this RFA will be made to foreign institutions
only for research of very unusual merit, need, and promise, and in
accordance with PHS policy governing such awards.  Designated funding
levels are subject to change at any time prior to award, due to
unforeseen budgetary, administrative and/or scientific developments.

In order to more evenly distribute administrative workload and reduce
the number of awards with July 1 or September 30 start dates, the
NHLBI will award ten months of time and money for the first competing
budget period of this project.  This action results in a project
period of 58 months rather than 60 months for R01 applications.
Investigators should plan their research projects and budgets within
these timeframes.

INQUIRIES

Inquiries concerning this RFA are encouraged.  The opportunity to
clarify any issues or questions from potential applicants is welcome.

Helena O. Mishoe, Ph.D.
Division of Blood Diseases and Resources
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Federal Building, Room 5A12
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 496-5911
FAX:  (301) 496-9940
Email:  Helena_Mishoe@NIH.Gov

Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to:

Ms. Jane R. Davis
Division of Extramural Affairs
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Westwood Building, Room 4A11
Bethesda, MD  20892
Telephone:  (301) 594-7436
FAX:  (301) 594-7492
Email:  Jane_Davis@NIH.Gov

AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS

The programs of the Division of Blood Diseases and Resources, NHLBI,
are described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number
93.839.  Awards are made under the authority of the Public Health
Service Act, Section 301 (42 USC 241) and administered under PHS
grant policies and Federal regulations, most specifically 42 CFR Part
52 and 45 CFR Part 74.  This program is not subject to the
intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or
Health Systems Agency Review.

References

1.  Spivak JL, Bender BS, Quinn TC. Hematologic abnormalities in the
acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Am J Medicine 77:224-228, 1974.

2.  Zon, LI, Arkin C, Groopman JE. Hematologic Manifestations of
human immune deficiency virus (HIV). Br J Haematol 66:251-256, 1987.

3.  Fischl MA, Ricnman DD, Hansen N, Collier AC, Carey JT, Para MF,
Hardy D. Dolin R. Powderly WG, Allan JD, Wong B, Merigan TC,
McAuliffe VJ, Hyslop NE. Rhame FS, Balfour HH, Spector SA, Volberdino
P, Pettinelli C, Anderson J. The safety and efficacy of zidovudine
(AZT) in the treatment of subjects with mildly symptomatic human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV) infection.  Annals Internal Med
112:727-737, 1990.

4.  Groopman JE, Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating tor in
human immunodeficiency virus disease. Semin Hematol 27:8-14, 1990.

5.  Groopman JE, Mitsuyasu RT, DeLeo MY, et al. Effect of recombinant
human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on
myelopoiesis in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med
317:533-598, 1987.

6.  Baldwin GC, Gasson JC, Quan SG, et al. Granulocyte-macrophage
colonystimulating factor enhances neutrophil function in acquired
immunodeficiency syndrome patients. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the USA 85:2763-2766, 1988.

7.  Peters WP, Stuart A, Affronti MI, Kim KS, Coleman R. Neutrophil
migration is defective during recombinant GMCSF infusion after
autologous bone marrow transplantation in humans. Blood 72:1310-1315,
1988.

8.  Perno CF, Yarchoan R, Cooney DA, et al. Replication of human
immunodeficiency virus in monocytes; granulocyte/macrophage
colonystimulating factor (GM-CSF) potentiates viral production yet
enhances the antiviral effect mediated by
3'-azido-2'3'-dideoxythymidine (AZT) and other dideoxynucleoside
congeners of thymidine. J Exp Med 169:933-951, 1989.

9.  Pluda JM, Yarchoan R, Smith PD, et al. Subcutaneous recombinant
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor used as a single
agent and in an alternating regimen with azidothymidine in leukopenic
patients with severe human immunodeficiency virus infection. Blood
76:463-472, 1990.

10.  Koyanagi Y, O'Brien WA, Zhao JQ. Cytokines alter production of
HIV-1 from primary mononuclear phagocytes. Science 241:1673-1675,
1988.

11.  Davey RT, Davey V, Zurol J. A phase I/II trial of zidovudine
interferon alpha and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor
in treatment of HIV infection. 6th Int Conf on AIDS, San Francisco,
June 11-24, 1990.

12.  Miles SA, Milsuyasu R, Fink N. Recombinant G-CSF and recombinant
erythropoietin may abrogate the neutropenia and anemia of AIDS and
allow resumption of AZT. 5th Int Conf on AIDS, Montreal, June 4-9, p.
550, 1989.

13.  Perno CF, Yarchoan R, Cooney DA, et al. Differential modulation
of HIV replication and AZT activity in monocyte/macrophages by GM-
CSF, M-CSF, G-CSF. 5th Int Conf on AIDS, Montreal, June 4-9, p. 536,
1989.

14.  Alter R, Welniak LA, Jackson JD, Garrison L, Weisenburger DD,
Kessinger, A. In vitro clonogenic monitoring of peripheral blood stem
cell collections following interleukin-3 administration. Blood 76(10)
Supplement 1:129a, 1990.

15.  Lane HC, Davey V, Kovacs JA, et al. Interferon-alpha in patients
with asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Ann
Intern Med 112:805-811, 1990.

16.  Pantaleo G, Grazios C, Demarest JF, Butini L, HIV infection is
active and progressive in lymphoid tissues during the clinically late
stage of the disease. Nature 362(6418): 355-358, 1993.

17.  Fultz P. Nonhuman primate models for AIDS. Clinical Infectious
Diseases 17 (suppl 1): S230-S235, 1993.

18.  Letvin, N. Animal models for the study of human immunodeficiency
virus infections. Current Opinions in Immunology 4:481-485, 1992.

From owner-sci-resources@net.bio.net Mon Nov 07 22:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: BIOSCI Administrator <biosci-help@net.bio.net>
Newsgroups: bionet.sci-resources
Subject: NSF - Summary of new documents on STIS - 6 November 1994
Date: 7 Nov 1994 19:10:48 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 138
Sender: biohelp@net.bio.net
Approved: biosci-moderator@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <39mq7o$95j@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

This message contains a summary of the documents added to the NSF STIS
system in the previous week.  Reference material concerning STIS
follows the summary.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     ** NEW DOCUMENTS ON STIS **

Document Type: Press Release

   Title: ULTRAFAST LASERS PRODUCE ‘PICTURE’ OF BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES
          IN MOLECULES
               File size (bytes):       2777
               STIS Filename:           pr9469

   Title: NSF AWARDS FIRST METACENTER REGIONAL ALLIANCE GRANTS
               File size (bytes):       8907
               STIS Filename:           pr9470

Document Type: Program Guideline

   Title: Guidelines for the NSF Graduate Research Traineeship
          Program (NSF 94-140)
               File size (bytes):       32463
               STIS Filename:           nsf94140

   Title: NSF 94-151 - Sensor and Sensor Systems for Power Systems
          and Other Dispersed Civil Infrastructure Systems
               File size (bytes):       21979
               STIS Filename:           nsf94151

   Title: NSF 94-152 - GLOBAL LEARNING AND OBSERVATIONS TO BENEFIT
          THE ENVIRONMENT (GLOBE)
               File size (bytes):       42694
               STIS Filename:           nsf94152

   Title: NSF 94-154 - Research on Composite and Hybrid Structures
               File size (bytes):       14474
               STIS Filename:           nsf94154

   Title: NSF 94-156  Academic Research Infrastructure (ARI) Program
          Instrumentation Development and Acquisition Solicitation
               File size (bytes):       36676
               STIS Filename:           nsf94156

Document Type: Recruit

   Title: Director, Division of Ocean Sciences
               File size (bytes):       7684
               STIS Filename:           vep951c

   Title: Director, Division of Ocean Sciences
               File size (bytes):       5249
               STIS Filename:           vep951i

   Title: Director, Division of Ocean Sciences
               File size (bytes):       7446
               STIS Filename:           vep951l

   Title: Cooperative Education Program (CO-OP)
               File size (bytes):       3957
               STIS Filename:           vgs9523

Document Type: SRS Report

   Title: NSF 94-307 Characteristics of Doctoral Science & Engineers
          in the United States- 1991
               File size (bytes):       3940
               STIS Filename:           nsf94307
               Also available:          nsf94307.zip

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                ** UPDATES TO EXISTING STIS DOCUMENTS **

Document Type: Committees

   Title: NSF Advisory Committee Meetings
               File size (bytes):       8722
               STIS Filename:           cmpublic

   Title: NSF Advisory Committee Meetings
               File size (bytes):       8722
               STIS Filename:           cmpublic

Document Type: Letter

   Title: Current List of REU Sites
               File size (bytes):       84502
               STIS Filename:           reulist

Document Type: Phone Book

   Title: NSF Alpha Telephone
               File size (bytes):       94597
               STIS Filename:           phnalpha

   Title: NSF Organizational Directory
               File size (bytes):       99980
               STIS Filename:           phnorg

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOW TO OBTAIN DOCUMENTS

The above files can be retrieved in electronic form using the STIS
system.  If you don't know how to use STIS, send an E-mail message to
stisinfo@nsf.gov (Internet).  You will receive
a copy of the STIS flyer via E-mail.

If you are already using STIS, you can use the information above to
retrieve these files:

Documents via E-mail:

     Send a message to stisserve@nsf.gov (Internet).
     Use the "STIS Filename" shown above in the "get" command.
     For example, to retrieve phnorg, the text of your message should be 
     as follows:
                       get phnorg

Anonymous FTP:

     FTP to stis.nsf.gov.  Use the "STIS Filename" shown above to
     retrieve a file.  For example, to retrieve phnorg, you would
     enter:
                       ftp> get phnorg

WAIS or Gopher:

     Do a word search on the filename as shown in the summary.

If you want a *printed* copy of a document:

     Send your name and postal mailing address, and the document title
     and number to "pubs@nsf.gov" (Internet).

If you have problems with the above procedures:

     Send a message to "stis@nsf.gov" (Internet).

From owner-sci-resources@net.bio.net Tue Nov 08 22:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: BIOSCI Administrator <biosci-help@net.bio.net>
Newsgroups: bionet.sci-resources
Subject: No NIH Guide for 11/11/94
Date: 8 Nov 1994 18:32:40 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 3
Sender: biohelp@net.bio.net
Approved: biosci-moderator@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <39pcc8$1r6@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

$$MAIL BEGIN ***********************************************************
The NIH Guide will not be published on 11/11/94.
$$MAIL END**************************************************************

From owner-sci-resources@net.bio.net Wed Nov 16 22:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: amcgough@bcm.tmc.edu (Amy McGough)
Newsgroups: bionet.announce,bionet.jobs,bionet.sci-resources
Subject: Computational Biology Undergraduate Fellowships
Date: 16 Nov 1994 16:57:19 -0800
Organization: Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tx
Lines: 45
Sender: biohelp@net.bio.net
Approved: bionews-moderator@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3ad8ee$hjr@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net
Keywords: Computational Biology Fellowships
Xref: biosci bionet.announce:1582 bionet.jobs:6346 bionet.sci-resources:1161

National Science Foundation-supported
Undergraduate Training Opportunities 
at the W.M. Keck Center for Computational Biology


The W. M. Keck Center for Computational Biology 
Undergraduate Research Training Program

	Science and engineering are in the process of being transformed 
by the power of new computing technologies.  Our goals is to train a new 
kind of scientist -- one poised to seize the advantages of a national 
supercomputing prowess in solving important problems in biology.

	The W.M. Keck Center for Computational Biology offers studies in 
Computational Biology through three partner institutions: Baylor College 
of Medicine, Rice University, and the University of Houston.  The Program 
emphasizes algorithm  development, computation, and visualization in the 
areas of biology, biochemistry, and biophysics.   The Keck Center draws 
on the intellectual  and technological resources of its partner 
institutions, including the High Resolution Electron Microscopy Center 
and the Human Genome Center at Baylor College of Medicine, The Center for 
Research on Parallel Computation and the Institute of Bioscience and 
Bio-engineering at Rice University, and the Institute of Molecular Design 
and the Texas Center for Advanced Molecular Computation at University of 
Houston

	The research groups involved in the Keck Center are at the 
forefronts of their respective areas, and their laboratories are 
outstanding settings for the training program.  The faculty have been 
chosen to represent the fields necessary for the development and 
deployment of new computational tools in modern biology.  The subject 
areas encompass the intellectual activities needed to ask incisive 
questions, develop appropriate algorithms to approach the problems, and 
to execute the methods on modern computational architectures.
Trainees will have mentors to guide them in taking advantage of 
interdisciplinary approaches.

	The Keck Center Undergraduate Research Fellowships, provide a 
stipend of $1500,  are available for either during the academic year  
(for nine months) or during the summer (for three months).  

 	To obtain an application form, contact Marc Archambault, 
Executive Director of the W.M. Keck Center for Computational Biology, by 
Email at compbio@rice.edu, by phone at (713) 527-4752, or fax at (713) 
527-4659.

From owner-sci-resources@net.bio.net Mon Nov 21 22:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: BIOSCI Administrator <biosci-help@net.bio.net>
Newsgroups: bionet.sci-resources
Subject: NSF - Summary of new documents on STIS - 20 November 1994
Date: 21 Nov 1994 18:24:43 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 118
Sender: biohelp@net.bio.net
Approved: biosci-moderator@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3arkpb$kjg@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

This message contains a summary of the documents added to the NSF STIS
system in the previous week.  Reference material concerning STIS
follows the summary.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     ** NEW DOCUMENTS ON STIS **

Document Type: General Publication

   Title: NSF 94-116 -- The Alan T. Waterman Award
               File size (bytes):       18469
               STIS Filename:           nsf94116

Document Type: Letter

   Title: NATIONAL SBIR/FEDERAL HIGH TECH CONFERENCE IN SAN JOSE, CA
          NOVEMBER 14-16,1994
               File size (bytes):       1618
               STIS Filename:           ltrsbir

Document Type: Press Release

   Title: SPRING INAUGURATES NEW SEASON OF ANTARCTIC RESEARCH
               File size (bytes):       9743
               STIS Filename:           pr9474

Document Type: Program Guideline

   Title: NSF 94-150  Engineering Research Centers
               File size (bytes):       42231
               STIS Filename:           nsf94150

Document Type: Recruit

   Title: Director, Division of Mathematical Sciences
               File size (bytes):       8191
               STIS Filename:           vep9422c

   Title: Director, Division of Mathematical Sciences
               File size (bytes):       5735
               STIS Filename:           vep9422i

   Title: Director, Division of Mathematical Sciences
               File size (bytes):       7887
               STIS Filename:           vep9422l

   Title: Science Assistant, AD-1
               File size (bytes):       4929
               STIS Filename:           vex9445

   Title: Secretary (Office Automation)
               File size (bytes):       4994
               STIS Filename:           vgs9524

   Title: Secretary (Office Automation)
               File size (bytes):       5917
               STIS Filename:           vgs9527

   Title: Senior Program Assistant (Office Automation)
               File size (bytes):       5695
               STIS Filename:           vgs9528

   Title: Computer Specialist
               File size (bytes):       9230
               STIS Filename:           vgs9532

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                ** UPDATES TO EXISTING STIS DOCUMENTS **

Document Type: Phone Book

   Title: NSF Alpha Telephone
               File size (bytes):       94702
               STIS Filename:           phnalpha

   Title: NSF Organizational Directory
               File size (bytes):       100076
               STIS Filename:           phnorg

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOW TO OBTAIN DOCUMENTS

The above files can be retrieved in electronic form using the STIS
system.  If you don't know how to use STIS, send an E-mail message to
stisinfo@nsf.gov (Internet).  You will receive
a copy of the STIS flyer via E-mail.

If you are already using STIS, you can use the information above to
retrieve these files:

Documents via E-mail:

     Send a message to stisserve@nsf.gov (Internet).
     Use the "STIS Filename" shown above in the "get" command.
     For example, to retrieve phnorg, the text of your message should be 
     as follows:
                       get phnorg

Anonymous FTP:

     FTP to stis.nsf.gov.  Use the "STIS Filename" shown above to
     retrieve a file.  For example, to retrieve phnorg, you would
     enter:
                       ftp> get phnorg

WAIS or Gopher:

     Do a word search on the filename as shown in the summary.

If you want a *printed* copy of a document:

     Send your name and postal mailing address, and the document title
     and number to "pubs@nsf.gov" (Internet).

If you have problems with the above procedures:

     Send a message to "stis@nsf.gov" (Internet).

From owner-sci-resources@net.bio.net Tue Nov 22 22:00:00 1994
Path: biosci!biosci!not-for-mail
From: BIOSCI Administrator <biosci-help@net.bio.net>
Newsgroups: bionet.sci-resources
Subject: NSF - Summary of new documents on STIS - 13 November 1994
Date: 22 Nov 1994 16:07:46 -0800
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Molecular Biology
Lines: 107
Sender: biohelp@net.bio.net
Approved: biosci-moderator@net.bio.net
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3au14i$23u@net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net

[Note from the moderator - my apologies for the delay, this was lost
in the backlog from my recent trip.]

This message contains a summary of the documents added to the NSF STIS
system in the previous week.  Reference material concerning STIS
follows the summary.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     ** NEW DOCUMENTS ON STIS **

Document Type: General Publication

   Title: NSF 92-134 FACTS ABOUT THE US ANTARCTIC PROGRAM
               File size (bytes):       123040
               STIS Filename:           nsf92134

Document Type: Letter

   Title: NSF 94-158 ENGINEERING DEAR COLLEAGUE LETTER
               File size (bytes):       10601
               STIS Filename:           nsf94158

Document Type: News

   Title: Tip41107 - Media Tipsheet November 4, 1994
           