marine biomonitors?

Mark L. Tracy mtracy2 at netcom.com
Thu Jun 1 02:37:41 EST 1995

In article <3qcfo0$agg at bud.peinet.pe.ca>, stewart at bud.peinet.pe.ca (Paul
Stewart) wrote:

>         I am preparing a proposal for using the mussel (Mytilus edulis) 
> as a biomonitor in estuarian waters. Many areas in Eastern N. America 
> culture this species in estuaries, so the organism is built-in. 

Good choice of indicator organism. Filter feeders process lots of
suspended sediment.

> I did a 
> tox. study on oil effects on seabirds using assay of elevated MFO enzymes 
> in their livers as indicator. My idea is to plate these enzymes (if they 
> exist in the mussel) along with the bacterial mutants used in the Ames 
> Salmonella Mutagenicity Test, using the number of revertant colonies as a 
> background, then use these plates to test the relative toxicity of 
> sediments and concentrated water samples in coastal and benthic areas. I

This is a highly indirect assay. Many variables need to be controlled if
you want meaningful numbers. Can you think of a more direct test for MFO
> hope to apply this as useful monitor data to determine toxicity of 
> sediment runoff from agricultural coastal land, as well as impact of 
> offshore construction, drilling, etc.

Mixed Function Oxidases are involved in the metabolism of many toxic
substances, but it is hardly a comprehensive set. How do you assign
meaning to results when the assay has widely varying response factors that
may or may not correlate to "toxicity"? (No, this is not a rhetorical
question. The grant agency will likely ask it.)

I think your proposal has some good ideas in it, but there are a bunch of
issues that need to be sorted out before it is ready. Best of luck.

Mark Tracy

More information about the Toxicol mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net