DEFINITEly good news?
Joel M. Eichen
joele at earthlink.net
Sun Sep 26 10:56:19 EST 1999
renate.ratlos at bigfoot.com (Renate Ratlos ) wrote:
>>Too old for what? Hasn't been done anything with it?
>1998 is long ago.
Especially if you are talking composites! If its amalgam, any filling
done before 1973 is considered old. Anything less is a new filling.
>Multiple Sklerose http://www.teleport.com/~semerson/ms.html
More information about the Toxicol
Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net