DEFINITEly good news?

Joel M. Eichen joele at earthlink.net
Sun Sep 26 10:56:19 EST 1999

renate.ratlos at bigfoot.com (Renate Ratlos ) wrote:

>>Too old for what? Hasn't been done anything with it?

>1998 is long ago. 

Especially if you are talking composites! If its amalgam, any filling
done before 1973 is considered old. Anything less is a new filling.

>Multiple Sklerose  http://www.teleport.com/~semerson/ms.html
>Müdigkeit          http://www.teleport.com/~ctseng/cfs_pages/index.html
>Amalgam            http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_p0.htm
>Lyme-Disease       http://www.ariplex.com/lyme/lyme_top.htm 

More information about the Toxicol mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net