Aubrey de Grey wrote:
> [explanation as to why the proposed supplement scheme
> wouldn't work, which I was vaguely able to follow]
but then:
> However, the more general idea that the supplementation regime in
> question may have induced uncoupling of liver mitochondria is not at
> all challenged by the above logic. I see no reason a priori why such
> effects should not be inducible, and they would indeed make heat. The
> tricky part is to alter the cells' choice of which fuel to use to make
> that heat, i.e. to get them to use fat in preference to dietary sugars.
Why doesn't your earlier logic apply to the case of liver mitochondria?
sherm
