IUBio Biosequences .. Software .. Molbio soft .. Network News .. FTP

Open Archiving: What are researchers willing to do?

D Forsdyke forsdyke1 at home.com
Wed Nov 17 20:26:27 EST 1999

Stevan Harnad wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 1999, Marvin Margoshes wrote:
> tw> From: Thomas J. Walker <tjw at GNV.IFAS.UFL.EDU>
> tw> To find out what those attending my two most recent talks were willing to
> tw> do to promote free access, I asked in a questionnaire if they would...
> tw> (3) post their old articles on their home pages without permissions from
> tw> copyright-holding publishers? [80% would]
> >
> mm> Interesting that 80% said that they will break the law.
> mm> Is ignorance of the law or something else behind this?
> I think it is the very opposite of ignorance that is behind this.
> It is an awakening to what is actually at stake here for research and
> researchers, and how fundamentally different the copyright function is
> for the fee/royalty-based literature, for which it was intended, as
> opposed to the give-away literature that is at issue here: the refereed
> journal literature.
> Eighty percent indicate that they will self-archive their papers in any
> case.

Hello Dr. Harnad,
                 Actually I have been self-archiving with full approval
of publishing houses at my university site for over a year. Only one
publishing house has been a problem, Elsevier, and it says it is now
reconsidering the matter. 

                 However, there may be more out there like Elsevier.
Authors should, BEFORE submitting a paper for publication, determine
what the publisher's policy is in this respect. 

                 It would be a great service to authors if someone would
provide an easily accessible list of publishers who will permit
self-archiving with minimal strings attached (i.e. acknowledgement that
such permission has been given).


Donald Forsdyke. Discussion Leader, Bionet.journals.note


More information about the Jrnlnote mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net