Strong contamination with ethidium bromide

[Undergrad]

Have you the reference of this paper ? As you can expected I am very interest
!  



Jim 3975 wrote:
> 
> 
> To get cancer, 16 years is nothing. People who start smoking at 16 don't
> get 
> lung cancer until 40, 50 years later. (Average age of lung cancer death is 
> ~70)
> Bruce Ames showed in a PNAS paper in the seventies that smoking is more 
> mutagenic than ethidum bromide (using fairly realistic doses of both).
> 
>>"Prof. Piero Sestili" <sestili from uniurb.it> wrote in message 
>>news:mailman.1372.1181135432.5139.methods from net.bio.net...
>>Nothing to do with the past contamination!  Probably few EB molecules
>>penetrated to the germinative layer of your skin and most of it was
>>cleared by corneum.  Just forget it!  16 years ago I noticed an EB stain
>>on my right hand, due to unexpectedly broken gloves: I'm still here,
>>writing with the same hand....
> 
>>For the future simply wear two pairs of lattice gloves when using EB:
>>normal gloves do not protect so much...and go on with your PhD
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Methods mailing list
> Methods from net.bio.net
> http://www.bio.net/biomail/listinfo/methods
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Strong-contamination-with-ethidium-bromide-tf3868306.html#a11023760
Sent from the Bio.net - Methods mailing list archive at Nabble.com.