In Article<4kcd8b$ms9 at isnews.csc.calpoly.edu>, <smccull at jurassic.fisher.calpoly.edu> write:
> Path: news.NetVision.net.il!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!csulb.edu!newshub.csu.net!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!waldorf.csc.calpoly.edu!isnews.csc.calpoly.edu!smccull
> From: smccull at jurassic.fisher.calpoly.edu (Bunny Lover)
> Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts,bionet.microbiology
> Subject: Centrifuging MO's
> Date: 9 Apr 1996 01:07:23 GMT
> Organization: Micro Biology, DNA, etc, Cal Poly SLO
> Lines: 17
> Message-ID: <4kcd8b$ms9 at isnews.csc.calpoly.edu>
> NNTP-Posting-User: @jurassic.fisher.calpoly.edu
> Xref: news.NetVision.net.il bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts:3176 bionet.microbiology:843
>> Does anyone here know of optimal centrifuge forces sufficient NOT to pellet
> bacteria? I want to "clean up" some samples I have but don't want to
> rid the solution of cells(Salmonella).
> (email preferred, but not necessary)
> ** Scott D. McCulloch(Bunny Lover) | If we knew what we were doing,
> ** smccull at jurassic.fisher.calpoly.edu | it would not be called
> ** BioChemical Effects Research | research, now would it?
> ** http://www.calpoly.edu/~smccullo/ |
try just a few hundred Xg for a short time.
mowhite at netvision.net.il