Perhaps you can help me with a personal dilemma; I'm about to purchase a
microscope and I've boiled
the choice down to either a Leica Galen III or a Carl Zeiss Standard 20.
The Leica has more bells and
whistles than the Zeiss, and for the setup I'm thinking of it's also about
$1000 cheaper than the Zeiss. I
have not used either and am 500 miles from the closest demo unit. In your
personal opinion would I be
better off, in the long-run, going with the Zeiss? Is one more comfortable
to use than the other in terms
of fatigue? How would YOU compare these two microscopes generally?
Washington State University
slocombe at wsunix.wsu.edu