Again.....I still don't know what this has to do with microbiology.....and
what has being jewish got to do with ANYTHING????
>On Mon, 20 Jan 1997, Karl Roberts wrote:
>>> A reply.
>> The concept of eugenics is not new, not pretty, and is an
>> absolute abomination of everything we as scientists, teachers, and human
>> beings hold as truthful and decent.
>Syntactically speaking, that first sentence was totally unscientific, it was
>full of emotion, full of adjectives, full of biblical sounding catch-phrases.
>I deal in cold hard logic and reason . . do you?
>>> The freedom of speech is one of
>> our greatest rights, so it stands to reason that the narrow-minded ramblings
>> presented here should not be censored, rather, they should be allowed and
>> printed out as an example of how far we still have to come as a people,
>> and just how desperately we need to teach our children and young people
>> how truly related all humanity is.
>>Yes but you have still given **no** scientific, or what is more, rational
>proof that eugenics would *not* be a constructive thing. When you are
>finished ranting, and wipe the foam from your jowels, write me back - i'd
>be interested in finding out just why eugenics is 'counter-productive'.
>>>> We are a common stock, sharing a
>> genetic heritage unique among all other living things on this planet. We
>> have not yet begun to evolve biologically and mentally.
>here i agree with you to a large degree, this is precely why we need
>eugenics. Even in the j*w york times, there was an article in the science
>times about a year ago, stating that scientists feel taht human evolutoin
>has ceased since there is no kind of natural selection process. Eugenics
>could be a kinder and gentler natural selection process. No, the
>existence of subhumans and their proliferation is what is an 'abomination'
>their numbers only increase the ammount of suffering that the human race
>experiences -- I can assure you that over all -- Blonde Nordic Aryans of
>a high IQ and athletic physique are much more pre-disposed to lives of
>peace, tranquility, happiness and productivitiy than are any of the
>negroidian races and most of all j*ws. If you were a soul coming down to
>earth to chose a body - would you choose a negroid shell or a blond, Nordic
>advanced shell - I would choose the physical body that was best suited for
>a higher form of existence - would you?
>> But we can only
>> do so as a people, not as some unrelated conglomeration of separated
>> and different "races", sharing nothing but our unmitigated and irrational
>> contempt for one another.
>please read this responce too. My ideas are written out of a desire to
>make the world a better place - and yes, out of a contempt for what is
>wrong with it - this is what is called 'fighting for truth and goodness
>and combatting and hating evils and injustices'.
>>I may read this letter to my students, who come
>> from many different countries but all have a common goal-to learn and be
>> better people. I wish the writer of this sad commentary would approach
>> life with a similar set of priorities.
>> Karl J. Roberts
>> Assistant Professor of Biology
>> Prince George's Community College
>>>>If you do decide to read this responce to your students I'd appreciate
>you letting me know what your students said. And I thank you for doing
>so if you do -- the truth will convince them . . . and it will convince
>you (unless you are a j*w).
>>>PS - if your students are under 18 don't count on them being able to
>understand this stuff rationally - but then again maybe that is precisely
>what you want - personally i find it inappropriate to discuss these
>things with children because they are not ready yet to truly reason
>things out, maybe I should say no one under 13 then . . .some kids mature
>>and by the way, are you a j*w? if so you have no right to poison our
>gentile children with your semitic thought. Stop imposing your j*wish
>definitions of what is right and wrong, your intolerance and your 'one
>god' on the rest of the world!