Jorge1907 wrote:
> Reference #1 is certainly credible, isn't it? But if it's on the internet, it
> must be true. An unreferenced statement about arguing handwriting quality with
> an 8 year old girl at a party (assume Tom was there) is certainly a damning
> anecdote and the statement by his 2nd in command clinches it. Tom Kreske's
> diagnosis madness is indisputable!
Definitely :-))Loes
