Theories needed on life (Human + Chimp)

Norwitz Neal neal at tukkasotka.tut.fi
Sat Oct 20 17:44:03 EST 1990

Wayne Hayes writes:

> The further away from our
> branch of the tree we get, the more lax we are about defining
> species.  For example, we and the Chimps are a *lot* closer
> morphoplogically than some invertatrae that we call "sibling species";
> we're also closer than the horse and donkey, which can breed to
> produce a mule (or is horse+mule=donkey, whatever).  The only thing
> stopping us from interbreeding with chimps to see if we're sibling
> species is that, right now, most people would be revulsed by the idea.

Does anyone know if this experiment has been tried?  To bread a chimp with
humans would pose many ethical questions.  But it could provide some answers
about many topics including evolution.

	Neal Norwitz
	neal at tut.fi		What have we learned?

Opinions expressed are purely your own.


More information about the Mol-evol mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net