In article <33hnkk$e6j at mserv1.dl.ac.uk>,
I. Badcoe <mbbad at s-crim1.dl.ac.uk> wrote:
>> "Please don't waste our time with these *STUPID* and obviously flawed
> ideas. How dare you invoke a theory which you obviously don't
> understand merely in order to try and disprove another theory which
> obviously don't understand (and to which it can only be applied with
> great care) ?
>> Worse than that, how dare you do it in a newsgroup which by its very
> nature caters to those who do understand (and believe) the latter
> theory (so there's *NO*CHANCE* of you persuading any of them,
> anyway).
>> I can only assume that your real intention was just to trigger a
> Flame-Fest. Well done. Now go and do it somewhere else."
And once again, the appropriate "somewhere else" is talk.origins, where
there are lots of people who love this sort of debate.
--
Steve LaBonne (labonnes at csc.albany.edu)
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
POSITIVE, adj. Mistaken at the top of one's voice. -Bierce
