In article <2sri9k$eh4 at news.u.washington.edu>,
joe at evolution.u.washington.edu (Joe Felsenstein) wrote:
> I'm delighted to find some discussion of this -- as far as I can see
> cladists are currently extremely reluctant to openly discuss the logical
> foundations of their approach. See my book review in Cladistics, volume
> 8 pages 191-196, 1993 and the lack so far of the discussion it pointedly
> calls for.
And see the resonant silence in response to *this* post...
This bodes ill for further "discussion of this."