In article <012442FWHPJGRHRRAYLB at fornext.com>, percival at fornext.com wrote:
>> Would someone please explain to me what herbaceous, monocot, and dicot
> mean?
>
I see your point! None of those was mentioned in the "classic" or
"UR_Classic" papers on dominance just cited....
--
John M. Braverman
U.C. Davis
