In article <134311Z16041995 at anon.penet.fi>, an175779 at anon.penet.fi (Poor
Richard) writes:
>>Poor Richard has been writing on many of these newsgroups on the subject
>of the lack of ethics in Science. Poor Richard believes there are no
>ethics in Science. Poor Richard thinks that Scientists are no better
>than car mechanics in this regard, believing that if a car mechanic
>isn't closely watched, he will chisel you, and that Scientists are no better.
>
Who appointed this little puke as judge and jury of science? I think that poor
richard has way too much free time on his/her hands.
P. S. Hey, poor richard, here's a hint: Whining won't go very far toward
getting you a job. Maybe doing a little science that the rest of the world
considers important will help.
Gary Blanchard
