Humans slow mutation rate (Science)

Andrew Rambaut Andrew.Rambaut at zoology.ox.ac.uk
Thu Apr 27 12:20:19 EST 1995

In article <Pine.SOL.3.91.950414173342.20428A-100000 at corona> Patrick
O'Neil, patrick at corona writes:
>> 	I know there are several people who have published papers 
>> argueing that the "molecular clock rate" of different organisms varies
>> a function of reproductive time.  That animals such as rodents with a
>> or 2 month period between generations have a faster molecular clock
>> do primates with generation times of 3 to 30 years.
>> 	I could not find any references at my fingertips (no MedLine 
>I would think that generation _time_ would be rather irrelevant (Unless 
>your generation time is a million years :) ).  I would think that the 
>fact that mice have a less efficient DNA damage repair system than
>do, for instance, and so THIS would lead to a higher "clock rate" for 
>them vs us, that is, sequence variations will occur at a higher rate per 
>replication.  Correcting for more rapid generation time, the mutation 
>rate should itself be more important.  

Mutations that occur during DNA replication will only be accumulated in
lineage if they are present in the gametes. A shorter generation time will
present a greater chance of a mistake in DNA replication occuring in a
sex cell
that goes on to form a new organism. 

For references try:

Chao, L., & Carr, D. E. (1993) Evolution 47:668-690.
Martin, A. P., & Palumbi, S. R. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
Mooers, A. O., & Harvey, P. H. (1994) Molecular Phylogenies and Evolution

  Andrew Rambaut,                                          
  Zoology Department,       EMAIL - Andrew.Rambaut at zoology.ox.ac.uk
  University of Oxford,  
  South Parks Road, Oxford, England.        

More information about the Mol-evol mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net