In <3olggs$fbn at bruce.uncg.edu> Michael Scotto <mfscotto at iris.uncg.edu> writes:
>>I was just surprised to find that there are
>still people who have such faith in
>>After billions of dollars, years of research,
>and busloads of fossils providing what one
>eminent scientist referred to as less than a
>coffin-full of "evidence", I would think you
>people would have moved on by now.
>>But alas... the vanity continues...
>>"As by this theory innumerable transitional
>forms must have existed, why do we not find
>them embedded in countless numbers in the
>crust of the earth?"
> Charles Darwin
And pray tell us where U R going w/this. Molecular biology has inrefutably
set out the theoretical basis for evolution. Population biol & biogeog has provided
us with adequate experimental data. Thus if this is a pitch for creationism, then
maybe it should evolve to where it is willing to discuss it openly.