Relay-Version: ANU News - V6.2.0 06/23/97 OpenVMS AXP V6.2; site chasm
Subject: Evolutionary remnants in non-coding regions
Message-ID: <343E309E.2861C67C at bc.edu>
From: Charlie Hoffman <hoffmacs at bc.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 08:41:51 -0500
Organization: Boston College
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854";
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
I am well out of my area of expertise, so please forgive my ignorance.
My lab has cloned a fission yeast gene that encodes a member of a
highly-conserved gene family. The putative product is 44% identical to
a family members found from squid to human, however our protein lacks
the first 36 residues (about 10% of the protein) relative to all other
members. Even so, if I look at the coding capacity of the 5'
untranslated region, I find properly placed codons for absolutely
conserved residues found in the larger proteins. By "eyeball alignment"
using only two one-residue gaps I can produce 25% identity between the
"non-product" of the 5' UTR of our gene and the first 36 residues of a
Here are my questions.
1. Is it valid to suggest that this indicates the fission yeast gene
arose from a larger "standard-length" precursor and that what I am
seeing is an evolutionary remnant?
2. Are there computer programs that can ignore the fact that I have a
stop codon and produce a protein alignment that includes this region?
3. Are there other examples of this phenomenon? I do not consider this
to be the same as pseudogenes, since my protein is expressed.
I would greatly appreciate your comments.
"I'd rather be fission."