IUBio Biosequences .. Software .. Molbio soft .. Network News .. FTP

Temporal resolution of the brain

Hannah Dvorak DvorakH at starbase1.caltech.edu
Sat Nov 19 14:23:34 EST 1994

In article <mwspitze-171194113442 at phar2.medsurge.hsis.uci.edu>,
mwspitze at uci.edu (matt spitzer) wrote:

> In article <3aei0b$76t at news.cs.brandeis.edu>, bradw at cs.brandeis.edu (Brad
> Wyble) wrote:
> > 
> > More
> > specifically, its easy for an individual to maintain a 60 Hz beat, but
> > as the frequency decreases, it becomes increasingly difficult to stay
> > with it and predict the next beat without maintaining an internal
> > counting mechanism of some kind that divides the intervals between
beats into
> > subintervals.
> 60 Hz?  As in 60 cycles per second?  I would be suprised if a human could
> resolve individual acoustic events occurring at a rate above about 10-20
> Hz.  Could you please expand upon this statement?  If it's true, I would be
> very interested in finding out more.

Betcha the original poster meant 60 beats per _minute_, which is about as
slow as is easy to count regularly.  A really slow piece of music, like a
funeral march, is around 60 bpm. 


Hannah Dvorak                               |  
DvorakH at starbase1.caltech.edu               | Ceci n'est pas un .sig.
Division of Biology, Caltech, Pasadena CA   |

More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net