i only meant to imply that since he was so heavily criticised he would
surely attempt to replicate. (i understand the science part) ;-).
colleen specht
On 9 Jul 1997, James Woodson wrote:
> Criticism is a part of scientific progress. Don't feel sorry for LeVay,
> he's still the biggest name in the field among the laypublic. One study,
> right to the top. Who can criticise that?
