cmspecht at acsu.buffalo.edu wrote:
>> you know, simon levay took *a lot* of criticism for his work - that paper
> was 92 or 93? i think it is worth noting here as well that there has been
> no subsequent publication by levay which claims any replication of his
> findings (surely, he must have tried, no?)
As I recall, William Byne was attempting to replicate LeVay's findings. In
any case, I don't think publication has yet resulted.
Jim Kohl
