Ohhhhhhhhh, my! I thought you would rise to the bait, but how you did it!
Please explain the following:
>bio-programs
> link brain-energies on the low-power-ranges to the point of
>docking in.
>brainteach
>energies that are going off a brain
>all the energies there are
>many thousands of the major stages
>all subforms down to what a colleague of another branch called
>subatomic ranges
> pressure and wave form in the sectors of the brain
>all names down to the subatomic ranges for the energies
>different energy stages in the energy
>shifting and linking processes
>shift in the sectors and between the brains
>billions of pre-Christian-destruction times
>super-blockers
>"mind"-branches
>THC and the occiptal cortex as a good sector a first
>direct docking point and transformer / frequency tuner between the
>brains of two linking telepaths
>channeling-on-commands
>segregate far inside
>outer front banks
>net-size
All right, so much for terminology. Now for a few other points.
> what do YOU know about Shamanism and what
>about the OT levels of scientology?
Operating Thetan levels????!!!!! Oh, boy!
>...You are judging things with a speed that would bother me if I were
>you.
Let's take a poll. I am critiquing your posts to a science newsgroup using
science as the judge. If I have judged wrongly, let science show me wrong.
>I heard there is an Indian term "akasha" for all there is.
A defintion meaning "all that is" is kind of meaningless in science. Works
wonders for religion, but kind of useless as a scientific entity. It is
especially meaningless if you talk about "all that is"'s interacting with one
another.
Oh well. It was fun. I know that I will not have made my point to you. The
others are probably too tired of such things to read it. Still, I have had my
say. Thanks.
John
