"James Sharman" <james at exaflop.demon.co.uk> writes:
> It is not necisary for the superiour to kill the inferior. The basic
> premise of natural selection tells as that the superiour will eventualy
> replace the inferior. Even an incredibly small increase in proberbility of
> servival of the superiour humans will (given enough generations) evantualy
> result in the replacement of 'homo-inferious'
But the 'homo-inferious' can still catch on by simply having more children.
I think he has good chances.