Technological Singularity

Matt Atterbury matt at qbd.com.au
Sat Jun 6 09:12:05 EST 1998

ak at muc.de wrote:
> "James Sharman" <james at exaflop.demon.co.uk> writes:
> > It is not necisary for the superiour to kill the inferior.  The basic
> > premise of natural selection tells as that the superiour will eventualy
> > replace the inferior. Even an incredibly small increase in proberbility of
> > servival of the superiour humans will (given enough generations) evantualy
> > result in the replacement of 'homo-inferious'
> But the 'homo-inferious' can still catch on by simply having more children.
> I think he has good chances.

	Too right - ask any teacher :-)
> -A.

matt at qbd.com.au (ignore all other addresses :-)         "klaatu barada

More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net