since i sent you the doc, but you said you can't receive attachments, seems
there's nothing more i can do to "satisfy your curiosity".
your words are hurtful, btw. ken collins
> (Slagology ;-)
>> ken collins <kenpc at banet.net> wrote:
>> >Cijadrachon wrote:
>> >> Instead of publishing his AOK, manifesto and whatever stuff here, he
> >> seems to be out to rather avoid according criticisms
>> >i'll take NDT's stuff before any Scientists
>> Whatever that is short for, but if nothing else, at least there might
> be a decent explanation of that, AOK and a load of other terms,
> and at least it might make more sense if you are referring to your
> stuff here as if you had published it here recently enough so that
> people interested are likely to know what you are going on about (in
> case it should be written in a way that such is possible).
>> >why don't i just discuss it here, or in soe other online place? i tried to
> >do so in the early 90s, but the discussions were always drowned in B. S.
> >this isn't a problem except in the cases of folks who do not know the
> >Neuroscience... they cannot distinguish among all the posts. and since its
> >them for whom i've done the work, their needs are paramount to me, and
> >i'll neither foresake them, not allow them to misled.
>> So all neuroscientists agreed with what you said, and all who do not
> know about their stuff are too dumb to understand it and cannot
> distinguish between posts.
> And since you do not want to allow them to be misled, you stuff cannot
> possibly published in a neuroscience room.
>> This is one of the most stupid replies I heard in a while.
>> So far I neither registered a lot of interest from people into
> neuroscience nor people not into neuroscience into your stuff.
> Last I recall you went on about it, it was generalized stuff, not
> discerning between the subprograms of sectors and relations between
> them, and then making up words for totally generalized theories part
> of which were plain wrong.
>> >if you're so interested in understanding NDT, why don't you throw your hat
> >on the ground, over there in Berlin, and take up a collection that will
> >finiance a presentation in Berlin?
>> Apart from that you did not even bother to mention what it is that you
> are going on about again with your abrv.ed stuff again,
> as an LSD teacher I do have a certain reputation here among some folks
> that I am not out to lose.
>> I could as well publish Frank's theories about generalized memory here
> if I wanted to make a fool of myself.
>> (But if your telepathic tuning skills are not as bad as part of your
> people and brain areas functions generalzing theories you can get here
> and if I like you enough for that vibe interesting brain energy stuff
> into my shareware and other systems, and then it might go out into
> local, some Indogermanic and a few other magic "nets".
> You wouldn't happen to have some Red Indian magic data within your
> transfer range capacities? That would be neat, I'd like that for my
> internal collections.)
>> >i don't disagree... but do you see that the only options open to me have
> >been even more ridiculous?
>> What, to send your written works to a publisher?
>> Or to get some job and work till you can finance your representations
> yourself without begging for money with a hat for them
> or wanting others to do such for you?
>> Or to get more critical concerning yourself and your works?
>> Or praising your own erratic works under different e-names?
>> Or a head-line: What has happened to Ken Kollins?
> And writing about oneself as "he"?
>> Or to write a work about:
> "The Art of Becoming More Pathetic" / ABM-Path
>> (Sorry, I couldn't resist ...)
>> >i've given everything i have. if there's no one who'll do Science with me,
> >and no one who'll communicate Truth, then i can't do a whole lot more than
> >weep as i watch the thing against which i've been racing unfold, can i?
>> If you were a brilliant scientist it would amaze me if there were no
> one interested in hiring you or doing scientific research with you (in
> case that was what you meant with "do Science with me", which to me
> sounds odd like "do knowing/knowledge with me").
> I don't know why you have to keep Capitalizing and generalizing, and
> why you seem to have so much trouble finding people communicating true
> stuff / truth to you. Maybe they just regard you like some whimp
> circling around own erratic theories, instead of actions being into
> babbling, weeping and regretting himself.
>> If you are into science stuff, I suggest you are listing the areas
> where you are pretty up to date and wish to run research,
> maybe send stuff you published in that area to people who indicated an
> interest in hiring someone into that.
> You might find well-enough - paid work, possibly also together with
> others in that, if your works, knowledge and capacities are impressive
> enough and the whole is practical enough that people might see
> advantage in that. (The sex life of a woodworm might be less
> interesting for some than work on getting some artificial virus to
> link into cells with HIV gene stuff and dock into it and destroy it
>> >(is this sufficient information on the "state of my being" for today?)
>> Fortunately my being currently feels better.
>> There is a plate with Easter sweets in range,
> and I am a bit stoned and at terminating some chocolate rabbit.
>> I liked the thunders outside a bit ago, and would not mind if there
> were some more.
>> A friend of the same company I am member of asked if we are going to
> share some work stuff tomorrow and I agreed, and though that might not
> be much money, with the two of us going of gossipping over people and
> then maybe exchanging travelling experiences about different
> countries, that might be an interesting day ahead.
>> As lately I wasn't away for several days in a row from home,
> I guess half of the food in my fridge is actually edible at this point
> if having a good stomach, and I can open its door without needing a
> gas mask. The mess in my place has a path going through it that for
> knowing friends declares it is a very tidied up stage. And if someone
> could flush my neighbour and her ventilation system she likes to
> start between 4-6 in the morning down the toilet, it might be a
> really lovely night. ;-)
>> There are of course serious worries in life, like wether I should
> terminate the chocolate egg as well or rather have another joint
> or remain horribly abstinent of both and smurf to bed eventually
> to have more rest and maybe a better day tomorrow.
>> But I believe I shall survive such times of difficult decisions
> and the emotional stress they cause me.
>> (Is this sufficient information on the "state of my being" for today?)