In article <8sti7c$4f7$1 at nnrp1.deja.com>,
Chive Mynde <ooochiveooomyndeooo at my-deja.com> wrote:
> In article <siJH5.10681$Xc.270702 at nntp2.onemain.com>,
> "True" <truthlady at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> [denial is not a river in Egypt]
>> > Tell me why science is not the "appropriate" tool for proving the
> > of love if you consider science everything?
>> Love exists in the mind and as an expression of action in the world.
> Science cannot test love, reproduce love, or predict love, so Science
> is not an appropriate tool for examining love.
>> - Chive
It appears that I was too hasty in my reply.
Recently, science has made significant inroads into the investigation
of emotions, love and consciousness in general.
Additionally, I would like to query the following newsgroups for more
information regarding this topic:
"A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its
opponents and making them see the light, but rather because
its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up
that is familiar with it." - Max Planck
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.