Liar42 <liar42 at aol.com> wrote in message
news:20010127053000.15286.00001250 at ng-ba1.aol.com...
> >I don't believe that the cerebellum is associated with fear-related
> disorders.<
>> Why disorder? Most fears are orders, and are systematically to do with
> different body&brain systems and natural bioprograms in there, that are
> reacting as is natural for that individual in such a situation, though own
I
> attitudes and other peoples attitudes may cause alterations.
With this little piece of text I think you are trying to say that not all
fear is pathological. Although true, you seem to have forgotten that this
person saw a therapist, and thus his fear is (by the only possible
definition) pathological.
>> Apart from that agreed on that cerebellum does not register as a main fear
> emotion source.
> However if you got ill, would your systems shunt powers so you feel as
much
> "energy" as usual for what you tend to be into?
I don't really understand what you mean here.
> Apart from that the subject line did not suggest that the tumour was the
> result, but that the growth of it was a result, which personally I would
not
> entirely exclude.Might be more effective, though, to hover over what to do
> about the tumour in the present, than to stare into the past to aspects
that
> were there, and cannot be changed there in the past now.
I can see you are not a scientist here. Furthermore, you do not seem to be
interested in prevention. This remark actually makes me doubt all of your
other remarks. Should I? Please clarify.
Filip
