Why do you skip the so interesting preface to the document you
included in your post? I was going to include the url here, but I am
afraid that would give publicity to that person. No, I won't do that.
It's easily reachable from google searching for "einstein fraud".
Reading that document was a painful experience, for its contents and
for how badly it is written. I was writing an answer to it, and thus
reading parts of it several times, and the more I read the more I
felt like throwing up. It has nothing to do with you, I respect you
posted it, and in fact I like being reminded that this curse is alive
Do you really listen to people that write things such as the next?
One of the statements of Adolf Hitler most often quoted by the Jewish
media is the following from Mein Kampf, I:10:
"The great masses of people will more easily fall victims to a big
lie than to a small one."
Of course, Hitler is quoted out of context in an attempt to portray
this statement as Hitler's own, personal philosophy or strategy. But
if we read this selection in context, we find that he is speaking of
the Jews who had ruined his country, and he is trying to explain how
the German people fell victim to Jewish lies. In fact, Herr Hitler
even tells us what this great lie is that duped the German people
into being controlled by the Jews. He continues:
"Those who know best this truth about the possibilities of the
application of untruth and defamation, however, were at all times the
Jews; for their entire existence is built on one single great lie,
namely, that here one had to deal with a religious brotherhood, while
in fact one has to deal with a race what a race! As such they have
been nailed down forever, in an eternally correct sentence of
fundamental truth, by one of the greatest minds of mankind; he called
them 'the great masters of lying.' He who does not realize this or
does not want to believe this will never be able to help truth to
victory in this world."
Hitler here was referring to Arthur Schopenhauer, the eminent 19th
century German philosopher who was outspoken regarding the true
nature of Jews. We do not need to rely upon the opinions of German
philosophers and political leaders regarding this character trait of
the Jews, for Jesus Christ has said of the Jews,
"You are of your father the Diabolical One, and the lusts of your
father you wish to do. That one was a murderer from the beginning,
and he has not stood in the truth because there is no truth in him.
When he speaks a lie, he speaks of his own, because he is a liar, and
the father of it" (John 8:44 AST).
Furthermore, the New Testament warns us not to listen to "Judaizing
myths" (Titus 1:14). But Jewish myths are exactly what destroyed
Germany and what have destroyed America today. Herr Hitler may have
been correct in what he felt was the greatest Jewish lie, but there
are many, many more which have had a damning effect on the white
race. One of the greatest is certainly the lie of the Hebrew
Masoretic Text and the removal of the Greek Septuagint from the hands
of white Christians, but each Jewish myth stings with the same
poisonous venom. One of the great Jewish myths of the 20th century is
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Brian wrote:
> "ALBERT EINSTEIN is held up as "a rare genius," who drastically changed the
> field of theoretical physics. However, using the technique known as 'The
> Often-Repeated Lie= Truth,' he has been made an idol to young people, and
> his very name has become synonymous with genius. THE TRUTH, HOWEVER, IS VERY
> DIFFERENT. Einstein was an inept & moronic person, who could not even tie
> his own shoelaces; he contributed NOTHING ORIGINAL to the field of quantum
> mechanics, nor any other science. On the contrary -- he stole the ideas of
> others, and the media made him a 'hero.'
>> When we actually examine the life of Albert Einstein, we find that his only
> 'brilliance' was in his ability to PLAGIARIZE and STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S
> IDEAS, PASSING THEM OFF AS HIS OWN. Einstein's education, or lack thereof,
> is an important part of this story. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of
> Einstein's early education that he "showed little scholastic ability." It
> also says that at the age of 15, "with poor grades in history, geography,
> and languages, he left school with no diploma." Einstein himself wrote in a
> school paper of his "lack of imagination and practical ability." In 1895,
> Einstein failed a simple entrance exam to an engineering school in Zurich.
>> This exam consisted mainly of mathematical problems, and Einstein showed
> himself to be mathematically inept in this exam. He then entered a lesser
> school hoping to use it as a stepping stone to the engineering school he
> could not get into, but after graduating in 1900, he still could not get a
> position at the engineering school!
>> Unable to go to the school as he had wanted, he got a job (with the help of
> a friend) at the patent office in Bern. He was to be a technical expert
> third class, which meant that he was too incompetent for a higher qualified
> position. Even after publishing his so-called ground-breaking papers of
> 1905 and after working in the patent office for six years, he was only
> elevated to a second class standing. Remember, the work he was doing at the
> patent office, for which he was only rated third class, was not quantum
> mechanics or theoretical physics, but was reviewing technical documents for
> patents of every day things; yet he was barely qualified.
>> He would work at the patent office until 1909, all the while continuously
> trying to get a position at a university, but without success. All of these
> facts are true, but now begins the myth.
>> Supposedly, while working a full time job, without the aid of university
> colleagues, a staff of graduate students, a laboratory, or any of the things
> normally associated with an academic setting, Einstein in his spare time
> wrote four ground-breaking essays in the field of theoretical physics and
> quantum mechanics that were published in 1905.
>> Many people have recognized the impossibility of such a feat, including
> Einstein himself, and therefore Einstein has led people to believe that
> many of these ideas came to him in his sleep, out of the blue, because
> indeed that is the only logical explanation of how an admittedly inept
> moron could have written such documents at the age of 26 without any real
>> HOWEVER, THE TRUTH IS: HE STOLE THE IDEAS AND PLAGIARIZED THE PAPERS.
>> Therefore, we will look at each of these ideas and discover the source of
> each. It should be remembered that these ideas are presented by Einstein's
> worshipers as totally new and completely different, each of which would
> change the landscape of science. These four papers dealt with the following
> four ideas, respectively:
>> 1) The foundation of the photon theory of light;
>> 2) The equivalence of energy and mass;
>> 3) The explanation of Brownian motion in liquids;
>> 4) The special theory of relativity.