"Matthew Amsel" <matthew.amsel at mail.mcgill.ca> wrote in message
news:3D9F3D91.2B5A at mail.mcgill.ca...
> Jd wrote:
> > Bob <bobx23456 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > >
> > >> <"Evolution" CANNOT be observed, to any degree. The *speculation*
> > >> <human "evolved" from some other form of life has NEVER been
observed, to ANY
> > >> <degree.
> > >
> > >
> > >Evolution actually has been observed several times. You can't
> > >tell fundies though. Their mind is made up, don't confuse them
> > >with facts.
> > Are you talking about the white race?
> > >At Los Alamos National Laboratory one of the staff is an
> > >internationally known expert on plate tectonics, the physics of
> > >geophysical plate movement over millions of years. In the
> > >letters to the newspaper he's a very outspoken supporter of
> > >"Creation Theory" that the earth was created only about 5 or 7
> > >thousand years ago. Honest people really can believe mutually
> > >contradictory theories.
> > Look Bob, if evolution is the way and people did actually spring
> > from mud, you're only providing more ammo for those who say negroes
> > and other dark skinned folks make up the "mud races".
> > I believe your mistake is confusing Darwins "Origin of the Species"
> > with the theory of evolution.
> > Jd
> nope. pale skin is an adaptation to cold wheather and 1ess sunlight. Too
> much melanin in such an environment can lead to vitamin D (or was it E?)
> deficiency if not enough is contained in the diet. In hotter/sunnier
> areas (ex. africa, mideast, australia), darker skin is still superior.
This is an absurd, unproven, contradictory assumption.
IF there was any "adaptation" going on [for which there is NO proof or
evidence], then humans in hot, sunny climates would have "adapted" to the
hot sun by having WHITE skin which reflected the sun's heat, whereas humans
in cold, cloudy climates would have "adapted" by having BLACK skin which
absorbed as much heat as it can.
And if the climate of Africa is what keeps niggers from even being able to
build a wheel, then why did Caucasians from Europe move there and build
factories, schools, libraries, roads, communications systems, governments,
that the dumb niggers of Africa can't even maintain now that the
colonialists have gone? And why did Caucasians from Europe move to this
continent (which has an almost identical climate to Africa), and build even
better factories, schools, libraries, roads, communications systems,
governments, in less than 400 years, that the Indians who were supposedly
around 9,000 years STILL can't create on their own?
These differences are by design, not by accident.