Dan Holzman wrote:
>> In article <dmYo9.125175$S32.8964661 at news2.west.cox.net>,
> John Knight <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote:
> >The above is not a DEFINITION of RACE. The "court" didn't even attempt to
> >"define" RACE. The court MERELY responded to the cultural definition of
> >"WHITE", as established THOUSANDS of years ago, long before the "court" ever
> >even thought about it.
>> John doesn't realize it, but here he makes my point -- the definition
> of race has no scientific basis.
Actually almost nothing in law has a scientific basis.
And this includes Affirmative Racism.
But these laws exist, deny it if you wish.