IUBio Biosequences .. Software .. Molbio soft .. Network News .. FTP

brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

John Knight jwknight at polbox.com
Tue Oct 15 17:01:27 EST 2002


"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab at lojban.org> wrote in message
news:sh1kquci29278bi4liov0e0i9cid7410mf at 4ax.com...
> "John Knight" <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote:
> >> You can't read.  You are not plural, and you do not and did not
> >> comprehend Christianity.
> >
> >As if though we need a jew to "interpret" what Christianity is?
>
> We Christians certainly don't need YOU to tell us what we believe in.

You jew lovers haven't got a clue what Christianity even IS.

>
> >> >We moved to this continent less than 500 years ago and within 400
years had
> >> >developed one of the most successful economies on the planet, with
world
> >> >class educational institutions,
> >>
> >> You are referring to those public schools you so often decry?  The
> >> ones that have mostly been taught by female teachers ever since there
> >> have been schools?
> >
> >No, I'm talking about the schools that existed for almost 2,000 years
>
> That clearly is NOT what you are talking about, since you are
> referring to world class educational institutions that developed AFTER
> we moved to this continent 500 years ago.
>
> There were no educational institutions on this continent that have
> existed for almost 2,000 years, and indeed there were no such
> educational institutions in Europe that have existed for almost 2,000
> years.
>

Christianity IS an "educational institution", lojbab.  It's the best
"educational institution" in world history, and it's been around for 2,000
years.

But the BEST schools were the religious schools of Europe which had been
around for centuries before the US was even conceived of.  The reason Thomas
Jefferson wanted to set up schools in the US is so Americans didn't have to
send their children to Europe to get an education.

Too bad it didn't work.

> >before
> >Mr. Jefferson proposed THREE YEARS OF PUBLIC EDUCATION, which were run by
> >Christian MEN
>
> Nothing in his proposal mentioned Christians OR men running public
> education.

Because it was UNDERSTOOD at the time that the schools WOULD be run by
CHRISTIANS who would teach Christianity to CHRISTIANS.

There was no question at that time in anyone's mind about what kind of
schools they would be, and our Founding Forefathers would be absolutely
embarassed if they knew what happened to a possible good idea.
>
> >just as the Holy Bible instructs us to,
>
> The Holy Bible does NOT say that there should be three years of public
> education.

The Holy Bible DOES say that Christian children shall be taught
Christianity.

>
> >I'm not talking about the American "public" "schools" run by women who
> >managed to, in less than half a century, degrade our schools to such a
state
> >that they now produce morons like you and the world's LOWEST TIMSS
scores.
>
> Except of course that women were the vast majority of schoolteachers
> for a lot more than the last half century.  As far back as 1870, which
> is the oldest data I can find, women were more than 60% of all
> teachers.

Which is why religious schools which have men teachers have always produced
better students than women teachers in public schools, with the 100 SAT
point difference being just one *small* example.

>
> >> >the most advanced R&D ever known,
> >>
> >> Recognizing that most of those scientists graduated from
> >> aforementioned public schools, and a significant percentage of them
> >> are among the Jews that you hate.
> >
> >This all occurred BEFORE there were any jews permitted into science, law,
> >medicine, or government,
>
> Jews have been in all of those as long as this country has existed.
> (The most competent of the cabinet officials of the Confederacy was a
> Jew, Judah Benjamin, credited by many with keeping the Confederacy
> operational as long as it lasted.  He was also the second Jewish
> Senator, the first being David Levy Yulee starting in 1841).  And this
> country was not in the forefront of R&D until the last century when
> Jews were common in all of the above. The first Jewish Supreme Court
> justice was Brandeis, starting in 1916.

And it was precisely due to the STUPID jew Brandeis that the US Constitution
was turned inside out, and "legalized abortions" were made possible.

He is PRECISELY the reason the jews must GO.

>
> >and BEFORE our "public" schools became the insane
> >assylums they are today.
>
> No, that is where YOU live.
>
> >Being as we're now 17th and dropping fast,
>
> No.
>
> >you may not even be able to
> >remember that it was just in 1965, a mere 37 years ago, that the US had
the
> >world's highest per capita income.
>
> I suspect this is false.
>

You really didn't know that we once had the world's highest per capita
income?

How quickly things change.


> >> >and the once highest personal savings level ever.
> >>
> >> Prove it.  Americans have never been savers.
> >
> >According to the federal government, our personal savings rate in 1944
was
> >26% of disposable personal income,
>
> Talk about lying with statistics.  Personal savings was exceptionally
> high during WW II because 1) there were shortages and hence not a lot
> to spend things on, and 2) there was a big push for savings in the
> form of war bonds.

And I repeat:

"According to the federal government, our personal savings rate in 1944
was 26% of disposable personal income".

Your own source confirms this, so which part didn't you understand?

>
> Here are the numbers
> http://www.bea.gov/bea/dn/saverate.xls
>
> 1929 4.7%
> 1930 4.3%
> 1931 4.0%
> 1932 -0.8%
> 1933 -1.5%
> 1934 1.2%
> 1935 4.2%
> 1936 6.4%
> 1937 6.2%
> 1938 2.2%
> 1939 4.7%
> 1940 5.9%
> 1941 12.4%
> 1942 24.4%
> 1943 25.8%
> 1944 26.3%
> 1945 20.6%
> 1946 10.1%
> 1947 4.7%
> 1948 7.3%
> 1949 5.2%
> 1950 7.2%
>
> >but was down to a NEGATIVE 8.5% by 2000
>
> Nope.  Using the same source (so that the calculation is consistent),
> the savings rate did not actually go negative, but did go as low as
> 0.3% in October 2001.  But in August 2002 it was back up to 3.6%
>

According to this source, AND the 2002 US Statistical Abstract, and numerous
other sources, Personal Savings in the US in 2000 was a MINUS 8.5%.
http://christianparty.net/personalsaving.htm

> >Do you have any proof they're LYING?
>
> No, but the above is proof that YOU are lying.
>

Look at http://christianparty.net/personalsaving.htm again, closely.

NEGATIVE 8.5% PERSONAL SAVINGS RATE IN THE US.

> >If you don't believe this, then look it up in the archives
>
>http://web.archive.org/web/20010604202816/http://www.bea.doc.gov/bea/dn/sav
e
> >rate.htm
>
> That was preliminary data, which apparently turned out to be wrong.
> The spreadsheet cited above is the most recent version of that table,
> updated 9/30/2002.
>

So you believe Thomas Jefferson, the Holy Bible, Jesus Christ, and the US
Statistical Abstract are "wrong", but that you "liberals" are "right"?

Odd.

http://christianparty.net/personalsaving.htm

> >> Some of them were citizens since Thomas Jefferson became a citizen.
> >
> >So what?  If three quarters of Americans decide they shouldn't be
citizens,
> >they won't be.
>
> But that won't happen.

Why not?  It's happened 86 times in recent history, it's happening right now
in Russia and France, and there is NOTHING that can be gained by permitting
jews to remain in this land.

You also never thought the Berlin Wall would come down, affirmative action
would end, or White Christian Israelites in Russia would become our allies
in the war on muds, either.

>
> >> >and jews become citizens
> >>
> >> And they have been citizens since Thomas Jefferson was a citizen.
> >
> >Ditto.
>
> Ditto.
>

Ditto.

> Between Jews and Blacks alone, you are getting close to 20% of the
> population.  Add in the hispanics and you can't get 75% even if
> everyone else agreed with you (which we don't).
>

California has lots of Latrinos, yet even they voted for Proposition 187 to
end the flood of muds to the country.

You don't even know how much Americans detest you muds and your little
niglets, do you?

> >> >and the BIGGEST mistake was
> >> >not shipping all the welfare queens back to their countries of origin.
> >>
> >> For most of them, that country was the United States.
> >
> >Most niggers claim they're from Africa.
>
> False.  Most of them claim that they were born in the United States,
> because indeed that is where they were born.  Some of their ancestors
> (but not all since most blacks have some white blood) came from
> Africa, but Alex Haley aside, most blacks would have no idea where in
> Africa their ancestors came from.
>

The Moors and jews were born in Spain, too, but they aren't there now, are
they?

The jews were born in Russia, but that didn't give one single Russian one
single reason to lose any sleep as they exiled the jews, did they?

> >> But we should ship you back to your "country of origin", the domain of
> >> your Father the Prince of Lies.  You might find the weather a bit warm
> >> for your taste, but that is YOUR problem.
> >>
> >> lojbab
> >
> >I'm already back in my country of origin, and it's doing MUCH better
without
> >all the niggers that the US has to put up with.
>
> Back in Germany, so you don't end up in prison again?  Glad to see
> that you know longer consider yourself an American.  I guess we should
> notify the German authorities that they have a candidate for
> denazification.
>
> lojbab

It's amazing how you "liberals" can write entire paragraphs without
stumbling across even ONE fact.

It must take years of training to be able to misunderstand and misrepresent
every single word a White man writes, eh?  You can't quote even ONE word
from Jesus Christ or Thomas Jefferson correctly, you "interpret" the US
Constitution to mean exactly the opposite of what it SAYS, and a an English
dictionary must be pure Greek to you.

And then you ask why White men like Thomas Jefferson would want to exile
jews and niggers and other muds and "liberals"?

Just look in the mirror.

John Knight






More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net