In article <9euqfvgugcn41c5877t5vqh72gdn79qbl3 at 4ax.com>, lkh
<lkh at mediaiscorp.com> writes
>On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 08:44:16 +0100, David Longley
><David at longley.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>More significantly - who *answered* the questions?
>>The author of the paper. Would what was said have anything at all to
>do with who said it? And if so when did the topic change from what to
>who and why would it ever get so lost?
If you can't see the importance of the question you probably believe
anything you are told.