Place cells and addictive drugs
David at longley.demon.co.uk
Sun Jun 20 05:47:51 EST 2004
In article <Xns950E96FC2CDA7BilZ0rhotmailcom at 184.108.40.206>, BilZ0r
<BilZ0r at TAKETHISOUThotmail.com> writes
>gmsizemore2 at yahoo.com (Glen M. Sizemore) wrote in
>news:6e2f1d09.0406190814.412512a1 at posting.google.com:
>> GS: What you have just said IS the naïve philosophical view, and it is
>> precisely what doesn't work. Progress is not the result of mindless
>> application of some simplistic rules about testing hypotheses
>It has been for 4000 years.
(To repeat myself, do look into what I and others [albeit with different
locutions] have referred to as the 'problematic' nature of "intensional
opacity" and the light it throws on *behaviour*).
More information about the Neur-sci
Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net