On 4 Sep 2004 11:43:59 -0700, zzbunker at netscape.net (ZZBunker) wrote:
>r norman <rsn_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message news:<prdjj05ns83p7vkntojv256ost5gvklv7r at 4ax.com>...
>> On 3 Sep 2004 23:11:01 -0700, zzbunker at netscape.net (ZZBunker) wrote:
>>>> >r norman <rsn_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message news:<jrohj09c5s7pl63r904cqlmdgn2hkh1v7e at 4ax.com>...
>>>> >
>> > And of course "biologists" still don't believe that
>> > physics includes a little bit of math (among other notions).
>>>> Worse. Biologists know all too well that physics requires math, that
>> is why they avoid it like the plague. The problem is that too many
>> biologists still don't believe that biology includes a little bit of
>> math.
>> Biology obviously requires zero math, since Biology
> is nothing but a bunch of dim-lightbulb, zero-IQ,
> Scientists, Lawyers, Philosophers, and trees.
> It's only the the Wright Brothers that
> require an intensive quantity of Mathematics.
Check out
http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/MATHMPG.html
