IUBio

the liver and the brain

ZZBunker zzbunker at netscape.net
Sat Sep 4 23:30:07 EST 2004


r norman <rsn_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message news:<jl6kj0pi5apfrnatkct6r6te8a0b34t83r at 4ax.com>...
> On 4 Sep 2004 11:43:59 -0700, zzbunker at netscape.net (ZZBunker) wrote:
> 
> >r norman <rsn_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message news:<prdjj05ns83p7vkntojv256ost5gvklv7r at 4ax.com>...
> >> On 3 Sep 2004 23:11:01 -0700, zzbunker at netscape.net (ZZBunker) wrote:
> >> 
> >> >r norman <rsn_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message news:<jrohj09c5s7pl63r904cqlmdgn2hkh1v7e at 4ax.com>...
>  
> >> >
> >> >  And of course "biologists" still don't believe that
> >> >  physics includes a little bit of math (among other notions).
> >> 
> >> Worse.  Biologists know all too well that physics requires math, that
> >> is why they avoid it like the plague.  The problem is that too many
> >> biologists still don't believe that biology includes a little bit of
> >> math.
> >
> >  Biology obviously requires zero math, since Biology
> >  is nothing but a bunch of dim-lightbulb, zero-IQ,
> >  Scientists, Lawyers, Philosophers, and trees. 
> >  It's only the the Wright Brothers that 
> >  require an intensive quantity of Mathematics.
> 
> Check out
>   http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/MATHMPG.html

   But, you should also check that *Genes* are Biology. 
   *Genetics* is NOT Biology.

   That's was proven not by Neuro-know-nothings, 
   but by *Louis Pasteur*.



More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net