r norman <rsn_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message news:<jl6kj0pi5apfrnatkct6r6te8a0b34t83r at 4ax.com>...
> On 4 Sep 2004 11:43:59 -0700, zzbunker at netscape.net (ZZBunker) wrote:
>> >r norman <rsn_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message news:<prdjj05ns83p7vkntojv256ost5gvklv7r at 4ax.com>...
> >> On 3 Sep 2004 23:11:01 -0700, zzbunker at netscape.net (ZZBunker) wrote:
> >>
> >> >r norman <rsn_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message news:<jrohj09c5s7pl63r904cqlmdgn2hkh1v7e at 4ax.com>...
>> >> >
> >> > And of course "biologists" still don't believe that
> >> > physics includes a little bit of math (among other notions).
> >>
> >> Worse. Biologists know all too well that physics requires math, that
> >> is why they avoid it like the plague. The problem is that too many
> >> biologists still don't believe that biology includes a little bit of
> >> math.
> >
> > Biology obviously requires zero math, since Biology
> > is nothing but a bunch of dim-lightbulb, zero-IQ,
> > Scientists, Lawyers, Philosophers, and trees.
> > It's only the the Wright Brothers that
> > require an intensive quantity of Mathematics.
>> Check out
>http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/MATHMPG.html
But, you should also check that *Genes* are Biology.
*Genetics* is NOT Biology.
That's was proven not by Neuro-know-nothings,
but by *Louis Pasteur*.
