IUBio

the liver and the brain

r norman rsn_ at _comcast.net
Sun Sep 5 08:14:29 EST 2004


On 4 Sep 2004 21:30:07 -0700, zzbunker at netscape.net (ZZBunker) wrote:

>r norman <rsn_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message news:<jl6kj0pi5apfrnatkct6r6te8a0b34t83r at 4ax.com>...
>> On 4 Sep 2004 11:43:59 -0700, zzbunker at netscape.net (ZZBunker) wrote:
>> 
>> >r norman <rsn_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message news:<prdjj05ns83p7vkntojv256ost5gvklv7r at 4ax.com>...
>> >> On 3 Sep 2004 23:11:01 -0700, zzbunker at netscape.net (ZZBunker) wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> >r norman <rsn_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message news:<jrohj09c5s7pl63r904cqlmdgn2hkh1v7e at 4ax.com>...
>>  
>> >> >
>> >> >  And of course "biologists" still don't believe that
>> >> >  physics includes a little bit of math (among other notions).
>> >> 
>> >> Worse.  Biologists know all too well that physics requires math, that
>> >> is why they avoid it like the plague.  The problem is that too many
>> >> biologists still don't believe that biology includes a little bit of
>> >> math.
>> >
>> >  Biology obviously requires zero math, since Biology
>> >  is nothing but a bunch of dim-lightbulb, zero-IQ,
>> >  Scientists, Lawyers, Philosophers, and trees. 
>> >  It's only the the Wright Brothers that 
>> >  require an intensive quantity of Mathematics.
>> 
>> Check out
>>   http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/MATHMPG.html
>
>   But, you should also check that *Genes* are Biology. 
>   *Genetics* is NOT Biology.
>
>   That's was proven not by Neuro-know-nothings, 
>   but by *Louis Pasteur*.

I will be sure to relay this information to my students in my
Introductory Biology class as we go through several weeks of genetics
and population genetics as well as to my colleague in the biology
department who teaches population genetics, a course that has a
calculus prerequisite.





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net