r norman <rsn_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message news:<u3anj05nsjmfuto36menm0ngib1cm3tqku at 4ax.com>...
> On 5 Sep 2004 15:47:22 -0700, zzbunker at netscape.net (ZZBunker) wrote:
>> >r norman <rsn_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message news:<u54mj0pphl6e0jjthgal1dhoikatgtlkdn at 4ax.com>...
> >> On 4 Sep 2004 21:30:07 -0700, zzbunker at netscape.net (ZZBunker) wrote:
> >>
> >> >r norman <rsn_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message news:<jl6kj0pi5apfrnatkct6r6te8a0b34t83r at 4ax.com>...
> >> >> On 4 Sep 2004 11:43:59 -0700, zzbunker at netscape.net (ZZBunker) wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >r norman <rsn_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message news:<prdjj05ns83p7vkntojv256ost5gvklv7r at 4ax.com>...
> >> >> >> On 3 Sep 2004 23:11:01 -0700, zzbunker at netscape.net (ZZBunker) wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >r norman <rsn_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message news:<jrohj09c5s7pl63r904cqlmdgn2hkh1v7e at 4ax.com>...
>> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > And of course "biologists" still don't believe that
> >> >> >> > physics includes a little bit of math (among other notions).
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Worse. Biologists know all too well that physics requires math, that
> >> >> >> is why they avoid it like the plague. The problem is that too many
> >> >> >> biologists still don't believe that biology includes a little bit of
> >> >> >> math.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Biology obviously requires zero math, since Biology
> >> >> > is nothing but a bunch of dim-lightbulb, zero-IQ,
> >> >> > Scientists, Lawyers, Philosophers, and trees.
> >> >> > It's only the the Wright Brothers that
> >> >> > require an intensive quantity of Mathematics.
> >> >>
> >> >> Check out
> >> >> http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/MATHMPG.html> >> >
> >> > But, you should also check that *Genes* are Biology.
> >> > *Genetics* is NOT Biology.
> >> >
> >> > That's was proven not by Neuro-know-nothings,
> >> > but by *Louis Pasteur*.
> >>
> >> I will be sure to relay this information to my students in my
> >> Introductory Biology class as we go through several weeks of genetics
> >> and population genetics as well as to my colleague in the biology
> >> department who teaches population genetics, a course that has a
> >> calculus prerequisite.
> >
> > Of course it has a Calculus prerequiste. That's
> > follows quite naturally from the evolutionary
> > observation that Pasteur has both Calculus
> > prerequistes, infintesimal particles, reading glasses,
> > and meter-miles, thanks to Newton, not God.
> >
> > That still doesn't change the fact that genetics
> > is so orthongal to biology, that is it's not
> > off-limits to Biologists, it's also off-limits
> > to the extremely-weird, like students.
>> A couple of back-and-forths is sort of fun, but enough is enough.
>> Have you checked your medications recently?
No, I haven't. It's only legal for behaviourists
to do medications. The rest of still
aquire property naturally, in pure non-Nazi strains.