in article o141u05ig3p83hg0g40jir6hnhgs8d118n at 4ax.com, r norman at
rsn_ at _comcast.net wrote on 1/8/05 6:02 PM:
> On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:44:09 -0800, Sir Frederick
> <mmcneill at fuzzysys.com> wrote:
>>> Why is there such a lack of interest in neuroscience?
>> The whole issue of brain structure and function is IMO
>> the most important of all.
>> For some funny reason, it occurs to me that everybody that can read
> your question in this news group has an extraordinarily HIGH interest
> in neuroscience!
>> To rephrase -- why is there such an interest in neuro but so little
> interest in science?
But as to the original question, why is there such a lack of interest in
neuroscience, I wonder what is the emprirical basis of that question - lack
of interest compared to what? How was interest quantified, and by what
standard was it found lacking?