[Neuroscience] Re: Wherefore art thou Neuron Code?

Entertained by my own EIMC via neur-sci%40net.bio.net (by write_to_eimc from ozemail.com.au)
Tue Apr 3 19:24:47 EST 2007

"r norman" <r_s_norman from _comcast.net> wrote in message 
news:q3k51397ohdvlt8ma2acrk5ipj6gur7pq3 from 4ax.com...
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 17:27:19 -0400, "Glen M. Sizemore"
> <gmsizemore2 from yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> More long-winded than I had hoped but there
>>>>you have it.
>>> That is why working on lobster  stomach (as in stomatogastric system)
>>> is so much less worrisome!
>>Wise of you to keep it short, Dr. Norman. You knew that saying anything 
>>than one sentence would probably get me going again.
> I don't actually mind long winded stuff if, like yours, it has some
> actual content.  It is just that I am a bit preoccupied right now and
> don't have the time to spend reading it that carefully and responding
> to the technical details.  I do like the overall tone, though.

My EPT interpretation of your discussion is simply this:

Both of you are *potentially* and unknowingly scared [I'd say 'SHITScared' 
:-)] of what you would find if you analyzed habituation comprehensively 
enough (not just in depth but in dEPTh) and by force of this same scope of 
analytical logic you were brought close to touch on the topic of 

It is clear to me that this is a topic that to people near the norm of 
neuroscientific attitudes (where you two seem to be) is 
"effectively/presumably taboo".


More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net