On Mar 8, 11:03 am, "Alpha" <OmegaZero2... from yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Unfortunately, nonthing in that paper tells us how to account for
> first-person experience, which is the most irrefutable aspect of our
> existence. Psychology has a chance, AI on its current tracks has no chance,
> and neither does neuroscience as received; only the addition of an
> introspective approach (appreciated by some psychologists over a long time
> span of history) will find out what consciousness is;
Good grief, Charlie Brown [to plagiarize a well-known phrase], what
introspective miracle is going to occur in the future, and that hasn't
over the past 2400 years or so, to provide some enlightenment on
ness and first-person experience? Philosophy will magically solve the
via some newly-minted word-game?
>> what the first-person
> experience is. There is a case to be made that the fields are
> complementary; introspection would add important data /explanadums those
> other fields are supposed to be providing analysis and explanation of!