In article <1tp392INNsav at MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU>, smith-una at yale.edu (Una
Smith) writes:
>> you mention avoiding direct professional contact if a mutual attraction
> develops: what does that mean? Should one of the parties (i.e., the
> junior one) leave the field altogether, or just the department, or just
> find someone else to serve on the committee, etc. How far must it go?
>>
I'm not altogether unrealistic ;-). What I meant by avoiding direct
professional contact was along the lines of avoiding the _obvious_
appearance of conflict of interest. Ie, stay in the same dept, but not
in the same lab.
but I still believe with Patricia that such entanglements are a bad idea
from the start.
susan
forsburg at molbiol.ox.ac.uk
