In article: <3ifmh7$it0 at mace.cc.purdue.edu> barani at mace.cc.purdue.edu
(Barani) writes:
>>> Recently non-molecular biology postings have outnumbered
> the ones that are relevant to this group.
> I wish to express my opinion that bionet.molbio.ageing
> is a newsgroup devoted to discussions on molecular
> biological aspects only. I would recommend the discussions
> on ethical and social issues be directed to other longevity
> newsgroups (or we can always create a new newsgroup for that
> purpose).
I'd vote for such a newsgroup - I appeciate that I am often guitly of adding
to threads in this innapproriate way, but once started it is difficult to
stop!
The alternatives I know of are
sci.life-extension
sci.cryonics
and these could also benefit from an offloading of ethical and social issues
into the proposed group. I have cross posted this to these groups as well,
in the hope that maybe sufficient people will be interested, together with
someone who actually knows how to get a new group going!
> Disclaimer: This is not to underscore the importance of
> ethical or other issues.
>> Barani
> B-142 Lilly Hall
> Purdue University
>
--
Sincerely, ****************************************
* Publisher of Longevity Report *
John de Rivaz * Fractal Report *
* details on request *
****************************************
**** What is the point of life if it ends in death? ****
